processing order of acls

Hi all, Could anyone from the top of your head tell me if ACLs apply in a specific order? Say, I have an acl that matches url /a and uses a specific backend for all requests to /a. But if I want to use another acl and backend for /a/b urls - could I just put that acl-match above the /a match and

PROXY protocol and SSL session information

Hello there! I was wondering how to push information about SSL session (cipher, strength, certificate info) to backends. This is usualy done by injecting request headers before sending request to application servers or webserver handlers. I've read proxy protocol specification and i don't see

Re: Include client IP address in rewritten URL

The Apache instances run under Windows, and the application is a homegrown windows executable CGI. It's my opinion that the OS choice is the entire problem, but it's not something we can change without a complete rewrite of major systems. I'm a sysadmin, not a developer! I will talk to the

[DOC] fix a minor typo

should be httpclose instead of http_close --- doc/configuration.txt |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/configuration.txt b/doc/configuration.txt index 18c4047..fc1a901 100644 --- a/doc/configuration.txt +++ b/doc/configuration.txt @@ -3328,7 +3328,7 @@

[DOC] fix ignore-persist documentation

During the documentation of the ignore-persist keyword, I documented an invalid option ignore-persist and forgot to remove it. It's time to fix it. --- doc/configuration.txt | 24 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/configuration.txt

[MINOR] add warnings on features not compatible with multi-process mode

Using haproxy in multi-process mode (nbproc 1), some features can be not fully compatible or not work at all. haproxy will now display a warning on startup for : - appsession - sticking rules - stats / stats admin - stats socket - peers (fatal error in that case) --- doc/configuration.txt | 41

FreeBSD Host shows as down

Hello HaProxy list, I have recently setup an install of haproxy on two virtual instances in my environment. It is performing beautifully and really holding up to it's task quite well. To explain a bit about my setup, I have 3 CentOS 5.5 instances hosting the site and a fourth doing the same

Re: [MINOR] add warnings on features not compatible with multi-process mode

All 3 patches applied, thanks Cyril ! Also, that was a good idea to think about the admin_rules. It took me some time to find the relation until I reminded the enable/disable buttons ! Thanks, willy