Your mail 115.127.8.195:11801-88.191.124.161:25 contains contaminated file
_From_plant_tc_tc.umn.edu__Date_4_Jan_2012_15:09:08__Subj_Message_could_not_be_delivered_/message.scr
with virus Email-Worm.Win32.Mydoom.m,so it is dropped.
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 11:26:18AM +, Türker Sezer (YHB Sistem Yönetimi)
wrote:
I read PROXY protocol document in haproxy website but i couldn't understand
how i can implement it on my lb - backend structure. And i couldn't find
any other document about it. Can someone share his/her
Hi All,
Please can some one help me on setting rewrite rule for haproxy ssl.
I tried a lot but it fails.
Here is the config:
listen example_ssl 0.0.0.0:1443
mode http
balance roundrobin
option ssl-hello-chk
reqadd X-Is-Secure-Request:True
option
+Support.
With Warm Regards
Ravi Ranjan
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Ravi Ranjan rran...@apigee.com wrote:
Hi All,
Please can some one help me on setting rewrite rule for haproxy ssl.
I tried a lot but it fails.
Here is the config:
listen example_ssl 0.0.0.0:1443
mode
__
Please type your reply at the top of the email...
--
Jonas Ramsin | JAN 04, 2012 11:57AM CET
Hi,
Not sure if this was meant for our Support team.
Mvh / Best regards
Jonas Ramsin
Head
Hi,
As far as I can read, your configuration can't work.
From my understanding your traffic seems to be encripted, so HAProxy
can't manipulate it.
You must use stunnel or stud or pound in front of HAProxy in order to
decrypt traffic.
Then, your rewrite rule might work.
cheers
On Wed, Jan 4,
Hi,
Thanks for your guidance.
I am using stunnel too, but still its failing.
With Warm Regards
Ravi Ranjan
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 7:37 PM, Baptiste bed...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
As far as I can read, your configuration can't work.
From my understanding your traffic seems to be encripted,
Is there an ETA for this fix making its way to a 1.4 release? Also, is it known
what version introduced undesirable behavior with ruby clients? 1.4.9 to 1.4.18
is a fairly loose bound...
Thanks,
Bryan
-Original Message-
From: Willy Tarreau [mailto:w...@1wt.eu]
Sent: Saturday, December
Hi Bryan,
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 05:23:06PM +, Cassidy, Bryan wrote:
Is there an ETA for this fix making its way to a 1.4 release? Also, is it
known what version introduced undesirable behavior with ruby clients? 1.4.9
to 1.4.18 is a fairly loose bound...
It was introduced with patch
In my situation clients will be sending 1K of data, and I believe I can do
this with a http get request safely since the limit is I think 4k.
Ok so the benefit of this approach is you get to spread the load when the
solutions requires it, but at the cost of latency.
i.e. if it take 30ms for my
How is it possible for a single domain like www.example.com which maps to a
public i.p of xx.xx.xx.xx work when there are multiple haproxy servers?
The only way I can think of is if somehow your domain name maps to 2
different ipaddresses (if you can 2 haproxy servers).
I'm not talking about a
There are simple ways and big fancy ways.
I'd recommend a simple way to start out. DNS can serve more than 1 ip
address for a single name via 2 or more A records.
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 6:48 PM, S Ahmed sahmed1...@gmail.com wrote:
How is it possible for a single domain like www.example.com
I see, thanks!
what's the more fancy way? :)
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 10:12 PM, David Birdsong david.birds...@gmail.comwrote:
There are simple ways and big fancy ways.
I'd recommend a simple way to start out. DNS can serve more than 1 ip
address for a single name via 2 or more A records.
On
13 matches
Mail list logo
