Tcp logging in haproxy

2017-10-26 Thread kushal bhattacharya
I have included tcp logging in the configuration of haproxy.But I want to know how it will be loggged in and where the log will be done.My main moto is to dump log output in some custom file but watch the logs dumped into it. Thanks, Kushal

[PATCH] BUG/MEDIUM: prevent buffers being overwritten during build_logline() execution

2017-10-26 Thread Dragan Dosen
Hi all, Here's a patch that fixes the problem with trash buffers being overwritten during build_logline() execution. Thanks. Best regards, Dragan Dosen >From a5652cdbdbc71e4d303f28e6cacd7bdad263409f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dragan Dosen Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 11:25:10

RE: HAProxy1.7.9-http-reuse

2017-10-26 Thread Karthikeyan.Rajamani
Hell Bryan, Thank you for the response. I have replied inline. From: Bryan Talbot [mailto:bryan.tal...@playnext.com] Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2017 5:52 PM To: Rajamani, Karthikeyan (TR Technology & Ops) Cc: HAproxy Mailing Lists Subject: Re: HAProxy1.7.9-http-reuse Hello On Oct 26, 2017,

Re: HAProxy1.7.9-http-reuse

2017-10-26 Thread Bryan Talbot
> On Oct 26, 2017, at Oct 26, 6:13 PM, karthikeyan.rajam...@thomsonreuters.com > wrote: > > > Yes the log indicates that. But the RTT via ping is 204 ms, with http-reuse > always/aggressive option the connection is reused & we expect a time close to > ping+ a small overhead time, the

Re: HAProxy1.7.9-http-reuse

2017-10-26 Thread Bryan Talbot
Hello > On Oct 26, 2017, at Oct 26, 3:13 PM, karthikeyan.rajam...@thomsonreuters.com > wrote: > > Hi, > We have the set up working, the ping time from local to remote haproxy is > 204 ms. > The time taken for the web page when accessed by the browser is 410 ms. > We want the latency to be

Re: HAProxy1.7.9-http-reuse

2017-10-26 Thread Aleksandar Lazic
Hi -- Originalnachricht -- Von: karthikeyan.rajam...@thomsonreuters.com An: haproxy@formilux.org Gesendet: 27.10.2017 00:13:50 Betreff: HAProxy1.7.9-http-reuse Hi, We are testing a setup which has a local haproxy which connects to a remote haproxy which in turn calls an apache server

Re: [PATCHES][ssl] Add 0-RTT support with OpenSSL 1.1.1

2017-10-26 Thread Olivier Houchard
Hi, You'll find attached updated patches, rebased on the latest master, and on top of Emmanuel's latest patches (also attached for reference). This version allows to enable 0RTT per SNI. It unfortunately still can't send early data to servers, this may or may not happen later. Regards, Olivier

RE: HAProxy1.7.9-http-reuse

2017-10-26 Thread Karthikeyan.Rajamani
Hi Aleks, Thanks for the reply, I have replied inline. Thanks Karthik -Original Message- From: Aleksandar Lazic [mailto:al-hapr...@none.at] Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2017 5:54 PM To: Rajamani, Karthikeyan (TR Technology & Ops); haproxy@formilux.org Subject: Re:

Re: HAProxy1.7.9-http-reuse

2017-10-26 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Bryan, On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 03:51:33PM -0700, Bryan Talbot wrote: > > 4. Local haproxy log > > 172.31.x.x:53202 [26/Oct/2017:21:02:36.368] http_front http_back/web1 > > 0/0/204/205/410 200 89 - - 0/0/0/0/0 0/0 {} "GET / HTTP/1.0" > > > This log line says that it took your local

Re: HAProxy support for SOCKS4 as alternative to PROXY protocol?

2017-10-26 Thread Aleksandar Lazic
Am 26-10-2017 17:40, schrieb Ciprian Dorin Craciun: On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 11:11 PM, Aleksandar Lazic wrote: Currently the socks protocol is not implemented in haproxy. I was hoping someone had a patch "hidden". :) Well then it's still hidden ;-) What flow do you

Re: Tcp logging in haproxy

2017-10-26 Thread Aleksandar Lazic
Hi. -- Originalnachricht -- Von: "kushal bhattacharya" An: haproxy@formilux.org Gesendet: 26.10.2017 11:20:05 Betreff: Tcp logging in haproxy I have included tcp logging in the configuration of haproxy.But I want to know how it will be loggged in and

Re: HAProxy support for SOCKS4 as alternative to PROXY protocol?

2017-10-26 Thread Ciprian Dorin Craciun
On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 11:11 PM, Aleksandar Lazic wrote: > Currently the socks protocol is not implemented in haproxy. I was hoping someone had a patch "hidden". :) > What flow do you have in mind? I have a couple of use-cases in mind, like for example: * SOCKS4 in

Re: PATCH: Lua: add UUID to the Proxy Class

2017-10-26 Thread Thierry Fournier
Thanks Baptiste, This patch will be useful. Thierry > On 26 Oct 2017, at 21:59, Baptiste wrote: > > Hi, > > I saw that the UUID was missing in the Proxy Class in Lua, so I added it. > > The patch is in attachment. > > Baptiste >

PATCH: Lua: add UUID to the Proxy Class

2017-10-26 Thread Baptiste
Hi, I saw that the UUID was missing in the Proxy Class in Lua, so I added it. The patch is in attachment. Baptiste From 7fc0433e3f2da0e86bc5ae0cd845856ec23743b7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Baptiste Assmann Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 21:51:58 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] MINOR: lua:

HAProxy1.7.9-http-reuse

2017-10-26 Thread Karthikeyan.Rajamani
Hi, We are testing a setup which has a local haproxy which connects to a remote haproxy which in turn calls an apache server which returns a html page. Haproxy(local)->Haproxy(remote)->Apache. We have the set up working, the ping time from local to remote haproxy is 204 ms. The time taken for