Re: [ANNOUNCE] haproxy-1.9-dev3

> On 29 Sep 2018, at 21:41, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > Ah, a small change is that we now build with -Wextra after having addressed > all warnings reported up to gcc 7.3 and filtered a few useless ones. Hello, here are some warnings from clang version 6.0.0: cc -Iinclude -Iebtree -Wall -Wextra

[ANNOUNCE] haproxy-1.9-dev3

Subject: [ANNOUNCE] haproxy-1.9-dev3 To: haproxy@formilux.org Hi, Now that Kernel Recipes is over (it was another awesome edition), I'm back to my haproxy activities. Well, I was pleased to see that my coworkers reserved me a nice surprise by fixing the pending bugs that were plaguing dev2. I

Re: [PATCH] REGTEST/MINOR: loadtest: add a test for connection counters

Hi Willy, I thought lets give those reg-test another try :) as its easy to run and dev3 just came out. All tests pass on my FreeBSD system, except this one, new reg-test attached. Pretty much the same test as previously send, but now with only 4 x 10 connections. Which should be fine for

Re: [PATCH] REGTEST/MINOR: loadtest: add a test for connection counters

Hi Pieter, On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 12:05:14AM +0200, PiBa-NL wrote: > Hi Willy, > > I thought lets give those reg-test another try :) as its easy to run and > dev3 just came out. > All tests pass on my FreeBSD system, except this one, new reg-test attached. > > Pretty much the same test as

Re: [PATCH] REGTEST/MINOR: loadtest: add a test for connection counters

On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 07:46:24AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > Well, at least it works fine on 1.8 and not on 1.9-dev3 so I think you > spotted a regression that we have to analyse. However, I'd like to merge > the fix before merging the regtest otherwise it will kill the reg-test > feature

Re: H2O - an optimized HTTP server

Hi. Am 29.09.2018 um 07:33 schrieb Dave Cottlehuber: > On Sat, 29 Sep 2018, at 00:31, Aleksandar Lazic wrote: >> Hi. >> >> Have anyone used this server in production setup behind haproxy? >> >> https://h2o.examp1e.net/ > > Yes for the last 2 years at least. but from a pure speed and http2

Re: [PATCH] MEDIUM: lua: Add stick table support for Lua

Hi Adis, On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 05:32:22PM +0200, Adis Nezirovic wrote: > On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 04:52:29PM +0200, Thierry Fournier wrote: > > I Adis, > > > > Sorry for the delay, I processed a quick review, and all seems to be ok for > > me! > > > > BR, > > Thierry > > Great, happy to hear

Re: [ANNOUNCE] haproxy-1.9-dev3

Hi Dmitry, On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 11:05:19PM +0300, Dmitry Sivachenko wrote: > > > On 29 Sep 2018, at 21:41, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > > > Ah, a small change is that we now build with -Wextra after having addressed > > all warnings reported up to gcc 7.3 and filtered a few useless ones. > >

Do `tune.rcvbuf.server` and `tune.sndbuf.server` (and their `tune.*.client` equivalents) lead to TCP fragmentation?

Hello all! I've played with `tune.rcvbuf.server`, `tune.sndbuf.server`, `tune.rcvbuf.client`, and `tune.sndbuf.client` and explicitly set them to various values ranging from 4k to 256k. Unfortunately in all cases it seems that this generates too large TCP packets (larger than the advertised and