Re: [EXTERNAL] testing websockets

2021-11-02 Thread Илья Шипицин
reg-tests/http-messaging/websocket.vtc is able to catch issue 737 ср, 20 окт. 2021 г. в 11:55, Илья Шипицин : > Proposed testsuite only catches issue 737 regression in https mode. > > Also, it tests h2, because native chromium is involved. > > I'll check whether VTC is able to catch issue 737. >

Re: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH] BUILD/MINOR: cpuset Freebsd build fix

2021-11-02 Thread Amaury Denoyelle
On Sat, Oct 30, 2021 at 12:25:13PM +0100, David CARLIER wrote: > Hi here a patch to address freebsd build failure. > Kind regards. Thanks, applied. -- Amaury Denoyelle

Fundraising Training Courses

2021-11-02 Thread NFP Workshops
NFP WORKSHOPS Affordable Training Courses Bookings Our website contains booking links for all workshops. Google nfp workshops to visit our website and book your place. Bid Writing Do you know the most common reasons for rejection? Are you gathering the right evidence? Are you making

Re: [PR] Some grammar in peers.txt

2021-11-02 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 10:23:02PM +0200, PR Bot wrote: > Dear list! > > Author: John Roesler > Number of patches: 1 > > This is an automated relay of the Github pull request: >Some grammar in peers.txt (...) Applied, thank you John, Willy

Re: [PATCH 1/2] MINOR: jwt: Make invalid static JWT algorithms an error in `jwt_verify` converter

2021-11-02 Thread Willy Tarreau
Tim, On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 06:06:55PM +0200, Tim Duesterhus wrote: > It is not useful to start a configuration where an invalid static string is > provided as the JWT algorithm. Better make the administrator aware of the > suspected typo by failing to start. I'm hopeful that I can finally emit

[ANNOUNCE] haproxy-2.5-dev12

2021-11-02 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi, HAProxy 2.5-dev12 was released on 2021/11/02. It added 65 new commits after version 2.5-dev11. It comes a bit later than I would have liked but we've been struggling on another remaining bug in the resolvers that required some fair amount of analysis to knock down, and I didn't feel like

Haproxy + LDAPS+ SNI

2021-11-02 Thread Ben Hart
Hey all! So I’m setting up.. or have setup rather.. a few new production load balancer servers to be used for handling LDAPS connections. Anyway last week I encountered some client requests that were directed at ldaps.domain.com:636 and were given the wrong SSL cert. In the config (pasted

Re: Haproxy + LDAPS+ SNI

2021-11-02 Thread Lukas Tribus
Hello, On Tue, 2 Nov 2021 at 21:24, Ben Hart wrote: > > In the config (pasted here > https://0bin.net/paste/1aOh1F4y#qStfT0m0mER3rhI3DonDbCsr0NRmVuH9XiwvagEkAiE) > My questions surround the syntax of the config file.. Most likely those clients don't send SNI. Capture the SSL handshake and

Re: Haproxy + LDAPS+ SNI

2021-11-02 Thread Ben Hart
Oh nice.. Thanks for the second set of eyes Lukas. So funnily enough I was planning on doing a capture.. I just don’t have access to a system in that environment yet. So since I'm on the topic of the config syntax... I wonder, can I ask if the server directives are correct insofar as making