> On 30 Sep 2019, at 05:40, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 04:35:31PM +0200, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
>> Adis,
>>
>> Am 26.09.19 um 16:01 schrieb Adis Nezirovic:
>>> While I agree that using zero based array indexing is a mistake (wearing
>>> my Lua hat), I don't t
Hi guys,
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 04:35:31PM +0200, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> Adis,
>
> Am 26.09.19 um 16:01 schrieb Adis Nezirovic:
> > While I agree that using zero based array indexing is a mistake (wearing
> > my Lua hat), I don't think your proposal will make situation any better.
> > Actually o
Adis,
Am 26.09.19 um 16:01 schrieb Adis Nezirovic:
> While I agree that using zero based array indexing is a mistake (wearing
> my Lua hat), I don't think your proposal will make situation any better.
> Actually ot might hurt existing Lua code in unforeseen ways.
Yes, I understand that it breaks
On 9/26/19 3:11 PM, Tim Duesterhus wrote:
Lua arrays start at the index 1 by convention:
However, it is customary in Lua to start arrays with index 1. The Lua
libraries adhere to this convention; so, if your arrays also start with 1,
you will be able to use their functions directly.
(https://w
Lua arrays start at the index 1 by convention:
> However, it is customary in Lua to start arrays with index 1. The Lua
> libraries adhere to this convention; so, if your arrays also start with 1,
> you will be able to use their functions directly.
(https://www.lua.org/pil/11.1.html)
This patch ma
5 matches
Mail list logo
