On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 01:19:30AM +0100, Lukas Tribus wrote:
> You can merge the patch I posted today, as there is consensus for this
> particular fix:
> https://www.mail-archive.com/haproxy@formilux.org/msg35760.html
>
> It should be backported to 2.0 (or even 1.9 - I forgot to mention that
>
Hello,
> Guys, I must confess I'm completely lost in your discussions. I intend
> to produce another round of 2.1 and 2.0 tomorrow as time permits, so if
> you want me to get anything merged into it, please let me know. Lukas,
> I'll count on you to summarize and suggest what's expected from me
Guys, I must confess I'm completely lost in your discussions. I intend
to produce another round of 2.1 and 2.0 tomorrow as time permits, so if
you want me to get anything merged into it, please let me know. Lukas,
I'll count on you to summarize and suggest what's expected from me to
do at this
сб, 21 дек. 2019 г. в 01:44, Rosen Penev :
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 10:54 AM Илья Шипицин
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > пт, 20 дек. 2019 г. в 22:39, Lukas Tribus :
> >>
> >> Hello Ilya,
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> sorry about the delay ...
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 at 07:11, Илья Шипицин
> wrote:
On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 10:54 AM Илья Шипицин wrote:
>
>
>
> пт, 20 дек. 2019 г. в 22:39, Lukas Tribus :
>>
>> Hello Ilya,
>>
>>
>>
>> sorry about the delay ...
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 at 07:11, Илья Шипицин wrote:
>> >
>> > -#if (HA_OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER >= 0x101fL)
>> > +#if
пт, 20 дек. 2019 г. в 22:39, Lukas Tribus :
> Hello Ilya,
>
>
>
> sorry about the delay ...
>
>
> On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 at 07:11, Илья Шипицин wrote:
> >
> > -#if (HA_OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER >= 0x101fL)
> > +#if (HA_OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER >= 0x101fL) ||
> defined(OPENSSL_NO_DEPRECATED)
> >
Hello Ilya,
sorry about the delay ...
On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 at 07:11, Илья Шипицин wrote:
>
> -#if (HA_OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER >= 0x101fL)
> +#if (HA_OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER >= 0x101fL) ||
> defined(OPENSSL_NO_DEPRECATED)
> [...]
> -#if defined(USE_THREAD) && (HA_OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER
Hi,
> Le 27 nov. 2019 à 03:46, Willy Tarreau a écrit :
>
>> @@ -5046,7 +5046,9 @@ int ssl_sock_prepare_ctx(struct bind_conf *bind_conf,
>> struct ssl_bind_conf *ssl_
>> NULL);
>>
>> if (ecdhe == NULL) {
>> +#if defined(SSL_CTX_set_ecdh_auto)
>>
ср, 27 нояб. 2019 г. в 05:02, Lukas Tribus :
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 10:50 PM Илья Шипицин
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I resolved `CRYPTO_set_id_callback', `ERR_remove_state',
> `SSL_CTX_set_ecdh_auto' issues.
> >
> >
> > the following two will be addressed later:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 01:02:25AM +0100, Lukas Tribus wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 10:50 PM ??? wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I resolved `CRYPTO_set_id_callback', `ERR_remove_state',
> > `SSL_CTX_set_ecdh_auto' issues.
> >
> >
> > the following two will be addressed
Hi Ilya,
On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 02:50:18AM +0500, ??? wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I resolved `CRYPTO_set_id_callback', `ERR_remove_state',
> `SSL_CTX_set_ecdh_auto' issues.
Great, thanks!
I'm seeing some minor cosmetic details:
> @@ -5046,7 +5046,9 @@ int ssl_sock_prepare_ctx(struct
Hello,
On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 10:50 PM Илья Шипицин wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I resolved `CRYPTO_set_id_callback', `ERR_remove_state',
> `SSL_CTX_set_ecdh_auto' issues.
>
>
> the following two will be addressed later: `X509_get_notBefore',
> `X509_get_notAfter'
I'm not sure if matching
Ilya,
I can't comment about the patch itself, but wanted to comment about the
commit message.
Am 26.11.19 um 22:50 schrieb Илья Шипицин:
> Subject: [PATCH] CLEANUP: partially resolve #367
I believe this should be the 'BUILD' tag instead of CLEANUP. And I also
recommend to give a more
Hello,
I resolved `CRYPTO_set_id_callback', `ERR_remove_state',
`SSL_CTX_set_ecdh_auto' issues.
the following two will be addressed later: `X509_get_notBefore',
`X509_get_notAfter'
Cheers,
Ilya Shipitsin
From 158e07f29cbd40c7cd159330ffd748cb1b926647 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ilya
14 matches
Mail list logo
