Re: Haproxy & Kubernetes, dynamic backend configuration

Is it plan to support backend configuration with stats socket ? 2016-04-13 16:09 GMT+02:00 Smain Kahlouch : > Ok thank you, > I'll have a look to SmartStack. > > 2016-04-13 16:03 GMT+02:00 B. Heath Robinson : > >> SmartStack was mentioned earlier in

Re: Haproxy & Kubernetes, dynamic backend configuration

Ok thank you, I'll have a look to SmartStack. 2016-04-13 16:03 GMT+02:00 B. Heath Robinson : > SmartStack was mentioned earlier in the thread. It does a VERY good job > of doing this. It rewrites the haproxy configuration and performs a reload > based on changes in a

Re: Haproxy & Kubernetes, dynamic backend configuration

SmartStack was mentioned earlier in the thread. It does a VERY good job of doing this. It rewrites the haproxy configuration and performs a reload based on changes in a source database by a polling service on each instance. The canonical DB is zookeeper. We have been using this in production

Re: Haproxy & Kubernetes, dynamic backend configuration

Sorry to answer to this thread so late :p due to the fact that this will be changed when the pod is recreated! > Alexis, as i mentionned earlier the idea is to detect these changes by polling in a regular basis the API and change the backend configuration automatically. Using the DNS (addon) is

Re: Haproxy & Kubernetes, dynamic backend configuration

Hi. Am 25-02-2016 16:15, schrieb Smain Kahlouch: Hi ! Sorry to bother you again with this question, but still i think it would be a great feature to loadbalance directly to pods from haproxy :) Is there any news on the roadmap about that ? How about DNS as mentioned below?

Re: Haproxy & Kubernetes, dynamic backend configuration

Hi ! Sorry to bother you again with this question, but still i think it would be a great feature to loadbalance directly to pods from haproxy :) Is there any news on the roadmap about that ? Regards, Smana 2015-09-22 20:21 GMT+02:00 Joseph Lynch : > Disclaimer: I help

Re: Haproxy & Kubernetes, dynamic backend configuration

Disclaimer: I help maintain SmartStack and this is a shameless plug You can also achieve a fast and reliable dynamic backend system by using something off the shelf like airbnb/Yelp SmartStack (http://nerds.airbnb.com/smartstack-service-discovery-cloud/). Basically there is nerve that runs on

Re: Haproxy & Kubernetes, dynamic backend configuration

On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Smain Kahlouch wrote: > Hello all, > > I guess this question has been posted many times but maybe there is some new > way to achieve this. > > I'm currently testing kubernetes with calico and i configured a fixed > loadbalancing using

Re: Haproxy & Kubernetes, dynamic backend configuration

Hi Baptiste, How do you do ? :) Anyway my concern is more about changing dynamically parameters, by fetching a source at regular intervals (api) than about kubernetes itself. Actually, i only have one need currently : the list of servers part of a backend. This is the only thing i want to

Re: Haproxy & Kubernetes, dynamic backend configuration

> How do you do ? :) I do :) > Anyway my concern is more about changing dynamically parameters, by fetching > a source at regular intervals (api) than about kubernetes itself. Ok, this is important to know :) > Actually, i only have one need currently : the list of servers part of a >

Re: Haproxy & Kubernetes, dynamic backend configuration

If I may chime in here: Kubernetes supports service discovery through DNS SRV records for most use-cases, so the dynamic DNS support that Baptiste is currently working on would be a perfect fit. No special API support required. Cheers, Conrad On 09/18/2015 01:53 PM, Smain Kahlouch wrote: > Hi

Re: Haproxy & Kubernetes, dynamic backend configuration

> > euh, I'm lost here, could you details who does what exactly??? I configure the backends given the underlying configured services (running on kubernetes). So at startup, i already have a list of servers for each backend. Then this list can change as the number of instances can be scaled

Re: Haproxy & Kubernetes, dynamic backend configuration

> > If I may chime in here: Kubernetes supports service discovery through DNS > SRV records for most use-cases, so the dynamic DNS support that Baptiste is > currently working on would be a perfect fit. No special API support > required. Well dns would be great but, as far as i know, kubernetes

Re: Haproxy & Kubernetes, dynamic backend configuration

On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 3:12 PM, Smain Kahlouch wrote: >> euh, I'm lost here, could you details who does what exactly??? > > > I configure the backends given the underlying configured services (running > on kubernetes). > So at startup, i already have a list of servers for

Re: Haproxy & Kubernetes, dynamic backend configuration

On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 3:18 PM, Smain Kahlouch wrote: >> If I may chime in here: Kubernetes supports service discovery through DNS >> SRV records for most use-cases, so the dynamic DNS support that Baptiste >> is >> currently working on would be a perfect fit. No special API

Re: Haproxy & Kubernetes, dynamic backend configuration

I have implemented something similar to allow use to dynamically load-balance between multiple backends that are all joined to each other as part of a Hazelcast cluster. All of which is running in an AWS VPC, with autoscaling groups to control spin up and down of new members of the cluster based