Don't forget this...
Microsoft® Windows Vista™
Greg Woodhouse wrote:
--- Nancy Anthracite [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The New York Times even did it and
it was
not a mistake. It is corrected by editors to Vista from VistA
because we
fail to point out that VistA is VistA® .
So, we need to
Understand the difference.
Referring to MS was in response to Greg's suggestion to use
Vista with nothing - which is protected by the tm. TM
can have implications when length of use comes into the
dispute...
In any case, wasn't there something somewhere about
WorldVistA and Microsoft
Consider this.
A database/patient management system exists full of rich
patient data.
What's being debated in this thread is policy, which
translates into business rules, the data's the same,
regardless. If the business rules are set up to reflect
policy, they can be changed as policy
Loud and clear...!
Shame I'm not a policy maker... ;-)
Ruben Safir wrote:
And people who make policy tend not to be subject to that
policy - at least, where I live that's the case... Likewise,
the people who demand the information be made public are
usually in a position, I say usually, that
Likewise:
Chris Farley wrote:
Comments are inserted below:
Chris Farley
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephen
Hay
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 3:31 PM
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members
Sometimes a picture is worth, well, you know... ;-)
http://www.claybennett.com/pages/10_29_01.html
Kevin Toppenberg wrote:
This sounds like a discussion from an ethics course, where we have a
discordance between conflicting principles.
As physicians, we are trained to be patient advocates.
Hi Kevin,
I have to agree!!
One of the problems with UML is that people try to either
use it to do everything - and there are a lot of things that
the conventions within UML were never meant to handle - or
they think that, to be complete, they have to use all the
diagram types on a project.
Dammit! Exposed!!! ;-)
Greg Woodhouse wrote:
If you're an ardent fan of OO and have no sense of humor, you may want
to think twice before reading this, but it made me smile.
http://archive.eiffel.com/doc/manuals/technology/bmarticles/uml/page.html
===
Gregory Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All
Or, is UML just passing through the first stage of truth ? :-)
Greg Woodhouse wrote:
If you're an ardent fan of OO and have no sense of humor, you may want
to think twice before reading this, but it made me smile.
http://archive.eiffel.com/doc/manuals/technology/bmarticles/uml/page.html
===
for Enterprise information architectures. They
are not brains-off recipes and so, like all standards (common
conventions) require thought and innovation that will respond to HH
talents.
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Stephen Hay wrote:
Hi,
Are these models available somewhere? Are they formalised, or do
As a potential adopter, or at least someone trying to
interest organisations in becoming potential adopters, I
have to support this train of thought.
If it's not possible to show that there's a process in place
to ensure that all the substantial changes and patches will
be picked up and
Cycle processes and the
prevalent MUMPS Prototyping Life Cycel Model in 1998 and 1999 MDC
meetings but we've bee in Never-Neverland since and its time to return
to the real world and get on with it in order to benefit healthcare
as Stephen notes.
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006, Stephen Hay wrote:
I'd
Try this:
http://www.sse.edu/NR/rdonlyres/D5EFC4CD-9924-44DB-A1C0-B4855AAB642B/0/HotStove_OrgScience.pdf
Gregory Woodhouse wrote:
Try Googling Hot Stove Effect. There a number of research papers
coming out of the business schools that address exactly this issue, or
it's converse... They
Hi Greg,
I understand what you're saying, though not necessarily the subject
matter... :-)
From my standpoint/experience it's a marketing issue, in the largest
sense. And I don't say that lightly, or tritely...
There are people who are naturally inclined to investigate the
theoretical for
Thanks to all who responded,
I feel a little better now.
I guess part of the issue is that there are two issues, for me.
One is easily addressed by pointing people to the vendors who are using
MUMPS in their applications. But I'm really interested in the open
source aspect...
The other
I think I feeling much better... :-)
Consistent with the invisible technology bit, my own work in modelling
is rendering the invisible, visible. As with technology, organisational
infrastructure only becomes apparent when it's not working... So, when
we feel that it's not working, we need to
Joseph's and John's words reminded me of a course I once did
with the World Health Organisation. Amazingly, I have the
monograph in front of me, Educational Handbook for Health
Personnel, J-J. Guilbert, 1992.
In it, they draw heavily on the work of Mager (mid-50s) and
strongly advise that
Does anyone else get this:
The FTP server 215 MSDOS A N (FTPServer V4R2 by BisonWare
International) is currently unsupported.
when trying to access these diagrams??
And would anyone be interested in having a full set of
diagrams? I'm guessing that they could prove useful in the
event that
Thanks to all who responded.
I've managed to download the diagrams and, yes, they
certainly look as though they were generated automatically...
So, to answer some of the questions.
I use a tool called Mega Suite from www.mega.com which is
widely regarded as best of breed for process
Hi,
While not a software engineer, I've followed these types of
conversations quite often over the past decade or so...
My conclusion?
That software code is frozen thought and that physics
(Newtonian or otherwise) is the wrong science to be bringing
to it.
With what do we replace
Okay, thanks to both of you for the explanation and
suggestion...
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very
Hello,
Is it possible to put the notice about these calls into the
digest a day earlier?
I receive the Hardhats digest at about 17.00 local time,
here in NZ...
And every now and then it contains reference to a Community
Call, like this:
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 00:06:51 -0600
Subject:
Well, what can I say...?
Thank you for the warm welcome and words of encouragement.
What a great start!
I'll make contact off-line as necessary and continue to
watch what happens here, trying not to make too many
off-topic posts...
I look forward to finding ways to collaborate as we all
direction?
Many thanks,
Stephen Hay
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc.
Get Certified Today * Register for a JBoss Training Course
Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005
Visit http
24 matches
Mail list logo
