I'm currently running the beta on Windows 7 32-bit and using 2 sticks of 2GB
RAM. I have a recent need to occasionally run a VM with another OS in it.
I would like to assign that OS 2 GB of RAM, but as I only have 3.6 GB
available and need to run some rather memory intensive apps in the native
It's not the initial cost it's the forced renewals. SAVCE has none and is a legit
product if any vendor still has stock.
Question is what IS the business pack version? 5 licenses of CE that keep on working
or 5 licenses that time out in a year?
Your response makes no sense to me. Support is
I've run DD-wrt on a WRT54gs in bridge mode, worked way better than wifi card since
there's real antennas at work! ;)
When you go to bridge mode I believe you loose the ability to use that WAP as an AP.
Just jack a switch into it use wired.
FORC5 wrote:
Moving to a new house and my shop
of virus signature
database 4436 (20090918) __
The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
http://www.eset.com
--
Tallyho ! ]:8)
Taglines below !
--
Diplomacy is saying nice doggy until you find a rock.
Hello Brian,
32-bit is really locked to 3GB of RAM, it's just Windows is reporting the
3.6GB of RAM. If you want to do more RAM I suggest going 64-bit OS. I have
Windows 7 64-bit running with 8GB of RAM on a machine here at work and it is
running nicely. Using Windows XP virtual Machine to run
That's what I suspected. Thanks!
---
Brian Weeden
Technical Advisor
Secure World Foundation http://www.secureworldfoundation.org
+1 (514) 466-2756 Canada
+1 (202) 683-8534 US
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Tim Lider timli...@adv-data.com wrote:
Hello Brian,
I see where you can buy as little as 5 licenses of Norton Anti
Virus Corporate. Does this come with a built in malware / spyware solution?
This is not how I understand it to work, not that there seems to be
any kind of consensuses on this, but I read in Maximum PC that 32 bit
supports 4GB of RAM addressing. You start out with 4GB of RAM and
then windows starts knocking off for addresses already used by your
video card, your
4438 (20090918) __
The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
http://www.eset.com
--
Tallyho ! ]:8)
Taglines below !
--
Who is the Grateful Dead, and why do they follow me?
It isn't as much of a mystery as people make it out to be. By default, on a
32-bit system with 4GB of RAM, 2GB is available for user space, and 2GB is
reserved for exclusive use by the kernel--which would include kernel mode
drivers. You are also correct in that some of this upper space is reduced
Hello all,
Man explaining it and reading the explanation can make your brain hurt.
Let's just say for the original poster it's not enough and should upgrade to
64-bit OS.
Regards,
Tim Lider
Sr. Data Recovery Specialist
Advanced Data Solutions, LLC
http://www.adv-data.com
-Original
On Fri, 18 Sep 2009, Greg Sevart wrote:
It isn't as much of a mystery as people make it out to be. By default, on a
32-bit system with 4GB of RAM, 2GB is available for user space, and 2GB is
reserved for exclusive use by the kernel--which would include kernel mode
drivers. You are also correct
Tim,
In your business position I get this. Should you choose this position
personally, that is fine. Please accept that there are many folk
everywhere that just do NOT yet see the need for a 64-bit OS. JMHO.
Best,
Duncan
Tim Lider wrote:
Hello all,
Man explaining it and reading the
Aside from the pain of tracking down 64-bit drivers - why not go 64-bit?
Apple has already gone almost completely 64-bit OS with Snow Leopard and
it's been around in *nix circles for a long time.
---
Brian Weeden
Technical Advisor
Secure World Foundation
Brian,
OK, tell me why? What is the big glamor of 64-bit computing?
Besides the heavy business folk, why do I need to go 64-bit?
Yes, I freely accept that one day I will have to. Until then???
Zounds to me like the same noise I lived through with 8-16 and the
16-32 series of arguments. Yes,
.
At 07:24 AM 9/18/2009, you wrote:
Hello Brian,
32-bit is really locked to 3GB of RAM, it's just Windows is
reporting
the
3.6GB of RAM.
__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 4439 (20090918) __
The message was checked by ESET Smart
Brian,
Um, so why is being able to address 4GB of RAM such a big deal?
I comprehend the other thread about the RAM issue. Is this what this is
all about?
No. I am not starting a consumer choice discussion. I've read all the
past threads about Vista. I have read-thru all of this List's
wrote:
Hello Brian,
32-bit is really locked to 3GB of RAM, it's just Windows is
reporting
the
3.6GB of RAM.
__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 4439 (20090918) __
The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
http://www.eset.com
Duncan,
Obviously, you haven't had a need for that much RAM. After all these years
on the list, we all know you take your time to upgrade and there's nothing
wrong with that - eventually, you might hit that limit and decide the need
for more RAM.
Whether you believe it or not, the primary driver
Alex,
Thank you. A very insightful reply, but.
Alex wrote:
Duncan,
Obviously, you haven't had a need for that much RAM. After all these years
on the list, we all know you take your time to upgrade and there's nothing
wrong with that - eventually, you might hit that limit and decide the
20 matches
Mail list logo
