Oh man, that low? I just got used to 8MB (Gold, 6MB is standard/silver)
on Comcast here in Nj for that much and will be moving to Spokane in the
next few months if things work out right.
If that's the speed it's a real bummer!
Jeff Lane wrote:
Comcast here in Spokane is $42.95(if you
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of warpmedia
Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2006 1:14 AM
To: The Hardware List
Subject: Re: [H] Weird BitTorrent problem
Oh man, that low? I just got used to 8MB (Gold, 6MB is standard/silver) on
Comcast here in Nj for that much and will be moving
not get the break as I'm using EarthLink.
Mark Dodge
MD Computers
360-772-2433
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of warpmedia
Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2006 1:14 AM
To: The Hardware List
Subject: Re: [H] Weird BitTorrent problem
Oh man, that low? I
To: The Hardware List
Subject: RE: [H] Weird BitTorrent problem
At 09:48 3/26/2006, Mark Dodge wrote:
Here in Kent, SE of Seattle, I get 6 down and not sure what up,
Try this to determine upload speed:
http://www.speakeasy.net/speedtest/
for 48.95.
That is EarthLink thru Comcast leasing the modem
is probably clamping on P2P.
Jeff
- Original Message -
From: warpmedia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: The Hardware List hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2006 1:13 AM
Subject: Re: [H] Weird BitTorrent problem
Oh man, that low? I just got used to 8MB (Gold, 6MB is standard
At 03:03 PM 26/03/2006, Mark Dodge wrote:
Last Result:
Download Speed: 5041 kbps (630.1 KB/sec transfer rate)
Upload Speed: 350 kbps (43.8 KB/sec transfer rate)
I'm getting:
Download Speed: 4420 kbps (552.5 KB/sec transfer rate)
Upload Speed: 678 kbps (84.8 KB/sec transfer rate)
But when
T,
I don't knowit never worked well for me. I always attributed that to
user errorme.
Jeff
- Original Message -
From: Thane Sherrington (S) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: The Hardware List hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2006 1:10 PM
Subject: Re: [H] Weird
At 05:56 PM 26/03/2006, Jeff Lane wrote:
T,
I don't knowit never worked well for me. I always attributed
that to user errorme.
Heh heh. At least you can separate your silicon based problems from
your carbon based ones. :)
T
@hardwaregroup.com
Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2006 2:06 PM
Subject: Re: [H] Weird BitTorrent problem
At 05:56 PM 26/03/2006, Jeff Lane wrote:
T,
I don't knowit never worked well for me. I always attributed that to
user errorme.
Heh heh. At least you can separate your silicon based problems from your
At 06:04 PM 26/03/2006, Jeff Lane wrote:
True...I have heard that some sites are now allowing Bitorrent or
BitLord d/ls because they claim that the u/lds ratios can be
manipulateddoesn't that suck
Yes it does. I'm not sure how the ratios work anyway - I don't see a
speed
THAT will be interesting!! Let's see how that wrings out, eh?
J
- Original Message -
From: Thane Sherrington (S) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: The Hardware List hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2006 2:30 PM
Subject: Re: [H] Weird BitTorrent problem
At 06:04 PM 26/03/2006
You know, sometimes it is the simplest of problems.
I forgot I had kept all my partitions in FAT32 in case I ever decided
to use MythTV instead of MCE. Hmmm...now a dilemma.
On 3/25/06, Thane Sherrington (S) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 12:18 AM 25/03/2006, Brian Weeden wrote:
I have noticed
my question is this: how do you get a 5GB file via a torrent..it's so
friggin slow to get files that way.
Brian Weeden wrote:
You know, sometimes it is the simplest of problems.
I forgot I had kept all my partitions in FAT32 in case I ever decided
to use MythTV instead of MCE. Hmmm...now a
Not really. BT breaks up all files no matter how big into small
pieces and is uploading/downloading them all at the same time. But
it's not uncommon to wait a couple of days for a download that big.
I'm in no hurry :)
On 3/25/06, Anthony Q. Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
my question is this:
, 25 Mar 2006 09:07:40 -0600
To: The Hardware List hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] Weird BitTorrent problem
my question is this: how do you get a 5GB file via a torrent..it's so
friggin slow to get files that way.
Brian Weeden wrote:
You know, sometimes it is the simplest
.
-Original message-
From: Anthony Q. Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 09:07:40 -0600
To: The Hardware List hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] Weird BitTorrent problem
my question is this: how do you get a 5GB file via a torrent..it's so
friggin slow to get files that way.
At 06:57 AM 3/25/2006, you wrote:
You know, sometimes it is the simplest of problems.
I forgot I had kept all my partitions in FAT32 in case I ever decided
to use MythTV
why? doesn't KnoppMyth R5A30 support NTFS?
At 06:57 AM 3/25/2006, you wrote:
You know, sometimes it is the simplest of problems.
I forgot I had kept all my partitions in FAT32 in case I
ever decided
to use MythTV
why? doesn't KnoppMyth R5A30 support NTFS?
Read only though isn't it?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:hardware-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of CW
Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2006 7:34 AM
To: The Hardware List
Subject: Re: [H] Weird BitTorrent problem
Christ, I don't know about that. I get ISOs (DVD ISOs) via Torrent
(Mandrake
why? doesn't KnoppMyth R5A30 support NTFS?
Read only though isn't it?
Good that I found that out. I am going to put together a KnoppMyth
R5A30 setup with parts out of my boneyard using a
Tyan Tiger dual PIII board,
dual PIII 1Ghz CPUs,
750megs of Crucial PCI33 CAS2 ECC RAM
Couple of
hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] Weird BitTorrent problem
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 10:07:10 -0500
my question is this: how do you get a 5GB file via a torrent..it's so
friggin slow to get files that way.
Brian Weeden wrote:
You know, sometimes it is the simplest of problems.
I forgot I had
. Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: The Hardware List hardware@hardwaregroup.com
To: The Hardware List hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] Weird BitTorrent problem
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 10:07:10 -0500
my question is this: how do you get a 5GB file via a torrent..it's so
friggin slow to get
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:hardware-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Winterlight
Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2006 12:20 PM
To: The Hardware List
Subject: Re: [H] Weird BitTorrent problem But that's
At 12:03 PM 3/25/2006, you wrote:
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
2003
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:hardware-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of CW
Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2006 7:34 AM
To: The Hardware List
Subject: Re: [H] Weird BitTorrent problem
Christ, I don't know about that. I get ISOs (DVD ISOs) via Torrent
(Mandrake is a great example) which
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
2003 called
Cable and phone companies are giving bandwidth away these
days. Thank goodness for FIOS (not that I would ever touch
anything from Verizon) - their precense made Cox drop my
broadband bill to 29.99 and upped my download to 15Mb/s and
uploads to 5Mb/s.
@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] Weird BitTorrent problem
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 17:02:48 -0500
They supposedly are throttling which is why people change their ports to
from what I read.
Been using 52525 as per some writeup about Azuerus but have not confirmed
it's better or maybe too commonly
Subject: Re: [H] Weird BitTorrent problem
Same is true of other legit stuff like podcasts also.
CW wrote:
Christ, I don't know about that. I get ISOs (DVD ISOs) via Torrent
(Mandrake is a great example) which are 6.77G or whatever, and generally I
get around 400k/s. So, just start
- Original Message -
From: Hayes Elkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2006 2:03 PM
Subject: Re: [H] Weird BitTorrent problem
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
2003 called
Cable and phone companies are giving bandwidth away these days. Thank
goodness
Haven't tried this one yet - what was the advantage for you?
From: CW [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: The Hardware List hardware@hardwaregroup.com
To: The Hardware List hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] Weird BitTorrent problem
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 18:12:34 -0600
I used to use Azareus
Fairfax county (Virginia)
From: Greg Sevart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: The Hardware List hardware@hardwaregroup.com
To: The Hardware List hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] Weird BitTorrent problem
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 18:18:53 -0600
- Original Message - From: Hayes
At 03:19 PM 3/25/2006, Winterlight typed:
Not COX where I am ... still paying 39.95 for 4Mb/s down and 512Kb
upand I am standing 20 feet away from a fiber optic line.
where was this?
No FIOS here as of yet but I'm getting 5m/.5m D/U for $39.95 here
I've routinely downloaded 15g
:39 PM
Subject: Re: [H] Weird BitTorrent problem
Fairfax county (Virginia)
From: Greg Sevart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: The Hardware List hardware@hardwaregroup.com
To: The Hardware List hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] Weird BitTorrent problem
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 18:18:53 -0600
for the
taking.
From: Greg Sevart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: The Hardware List hardware@hardwaregroup.com
To: The Hardware List hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] Weird BitTorrent problem
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 18:55:46 -0600
Yeah. According to this page:
http://www.cox.com/Fairfax
25, 2006 7:34 AM
To: The Hardware List
Subject: Re: [H] Weird BitTorrent problem
Christ, I don't know about that. I get ISOs (DVD ISOs) via Torrent
(Mandrake is a great example) which are 6.77G or whatever, and generally I
get around 400k/s. So, just start in the evening, done by the morning
if they
are very serious as all the do is funnel our money to the heavy competition
locations.
Jeff
- Original Message -
From: Wayne Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: The Hardware List hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2006 4:45 PM
Subject: Re: [H] Weird BitTorrent problem
At 03:19
I have noticed recently with a few torrents that when I load them in
the program (right now I am using uTorrent but this affects Azureus as
well) it gives me a Not eough free space on the drive error. Even
when I am downloading a 5GB file onto a drive with 100GB of free
space, it happens.
Is
36 matches
Mail list logo
