On 22 March 2005 21:58, Claus Reinke wrote:
Yet another 6.4 installer, this time fixing issues regarding GHC
use on Win9x / NT4 installations:
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/stable/dist/ghc-6-4-bld2.msi
Unless some _really bad_ platform-specific bugs are reported against
this one soon,
Bugs item #1145315, was opened at 2005-02-21 20:20
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mjthomas
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=108032aid=1145315group_id=8032
Category: libraries (other)
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
ctrl-c issues
Please file a(nother) bug, we'll try to improve things for 6.4.1.
I thought I did?-) or is this list deprecated in favour of sourceforge?
Strange - command prompt windows should be nice and large and
scrollable, mine are at least. Cut-and-paste support is terrible, though.
oh,
Simon Marlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
...
Prelude System.system ls = print
*** Exception: C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM\CMD.EXE: runCommand: does not exist
(No such fi le or directory)
Prelude System.Cmd.rawSystem ls [] = print
_viminfo getname.pl index.html
ExitSuccess
Prelude System.system false = print
Bugs item #1169235, was opened at 2005-03-23 08:41
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=108032aid=1169235group_id=8032
Category: Runtime System
Group: 6.4
Status: Open
There's no such thing as cmd.exe on Win9x, it's COMMAND.EXE/COM.
on my win98se system, there's no COMMAND.EXE, either, only
COMMAND.COM.
Some System.Process.* code ought to be looking at the COMSPEC env
variable and not hard-code the name of the command processor. why the
switch away
On 23 March 2005 17:06, Claus Reinke wrote:
There's no such thing as cmd.exe on Win9x, it's COMMAND.EXE/COM.
on my win98se system, there's no COMMAND.EXE, either, only
COMMAND.COM.
Some System.Process.* code ought to be looking at the COMSPEC env
variable and not hard-code the name of
On 23 March 2005 15:34, Sigbjorn Finne wrote:
Simon Marlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
...
Prelude System.system ls = print
*** Exception: C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM\CMD.EXE: runCommand: does not
exist (No such fi le or directory) Prelude System.Cmd.rawSystem
ls [] = print _viminfo getname.pl
Bugs item #1169235, was opened at 2005-03-23 17:41
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by wthaller
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=108032aid=1169235group_id=8032___
Category: Runtime System
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 08:56:25PM -, Simon Marlow wrote:
On 22 March 2005 10:10, Andrei A. Voropaev wrote:
Well, looking at the makefile it becomes clear, that it must do so.
-
# Make DerivedConstants.h for the compiler
all ::
Sorry. Forgot to ask the next question on this process. Now that I have
unregistered compiler, how do I build the registered one?
I've tried to start with new tree and then run
./configure --with-ghc=T/ghc/compiler/ghc-inplace
make
But this resulted in an error
==fptools== make boot -
On 23 March 2005 09:18, Andrei A. Voropaev wrote:
Sorry. Forgot to ask the next question on this process. Now that I
have unregistered compiler, how do I build the registered one?
I've tried to start with new tree and then run
./configure --with-ghc=T/ghc/compiler/ghc-inplace
make
Yes,
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 09:26:26AM -, Simon Marlow wrote:
On 23 March 2005 09:18, Andrei A. Voropaev wrote:
Sorry. Forgot to ask the next question on this process. Now that I
have unregistered compiler, how do I build the registered one?
I've tried to start with new tree and then
On 22 March 2005 17:49, Matthias Neubauer wrote:
... we also need the state after renaming, but we then have to stop, I
suppose!
Yes, the HaRE folks also want the renamed abstract syntax too. We
haven't quite figured out how best to make it available: renaming is
intertwined with typechecking
FINAL CALL for PAPERS and DEMOS
preliminary announcement of WORKSHOPS and TUTORIALS
--
4th International Conference on
Generative Programming and Component Engineering
Hello
Here are some problems I see with the scheme:
1) No easy way of seing the dependencies of a single package.
Currently I can just look at the Cabal file and know what packages are
required. In the new scheme I would need to grep all the source files.
Not a very good improvement in my
Hello
I will soon give a course in Advanced Functional Programming at
Stockholm University
and for this course I am selecting a few research papers. Therefore I
ask you:
What would be _your_ choice of 5-10 research papers for an advanced
(senior graduate/D-
level) course on functional
I've uploaded a bugfix version of Alex, version 2.0.1.
http://www.haskell.org/alex/
This version builds with GHC 6.4, and fixes a bug which affects large
lexers.
Cheers,
Simon
___
Haskell mailing list
Haskell@haskell.org
S. Alexander Jacobson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ok, well lets unpack what is actually required here:
1. Change of syntax in import statements
GHC already has lots of new syntax.
I can see that one might wish to broaden the import syntax, rather
like Hugs once supported (but not now) to use
Here is what I designed and implemented for my language Kogut:
There is a file format of compilation parameters (compiler options,
source file encoding, directories to look for interface files for
imported modules, directories to look for libraries, C libraries
to link, directories to look for
Hi all,
Is it possible to compile and run Haskell programs on QNX? [1]
[1] http://www.qnx.com/
- Matt Munz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Haskell mailing list
Haskell@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 19:14:41 -0800, Thomas Hallgren
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Iavor Diatchki wrote:
Just to avoid confusion I think the suggestions were:
class Functor f = Monad f where ...
class Functor f = FunctorM f where ...
I know the first one differs from the Haskell report, but
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 11:29:51PM -0500, Cale Gibbard wrote:
I agree, and think that's a great idea for solving that problem.
Does anyone see any possible difficulties with it?
I think that perhaps specifying the entire instance might make more sense, eg:
class Functor m = Monad m where
Hi, this is my first exp about using mailling list. Try a post, uh:)
Here I describe my successfully steps to install wxHaskell on Mac OS X Panther.
Donot hesitate to contact me: [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you've any
problems/suggestions about this short description.
System Description
Machine: Apple
Switching to -cafe...
At 12:14 22/03/05 +, Malcolm Wallace wrote:
import http://domain.org/package-1.0.cabal#Network.HTTP as HTTP
import http://hage.org/package-2.1.cabal#Network.HTTP as HTTP2
--note use of HTTP fragment identifier for module name
I cannot see any of the Haskell
Today I've been learning about the wonders of QuickCheck. :-)
One (obvious?) question that is not addressed in at least the original paper
is how one might use QC to automatically verify the algebraic laws that are
often associated with type classes. E.g., could we add some QC properties
as
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 13:08:43 -0500
Benjamin Pierce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Today I've been learning about the wonders of QuickCheck. :-)
One (obvious?) question that is not addressed in at least the original paper
is how one might use QC to automatically verify the algebraic laws that are
Benjamin Pierce [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Today I've been learning about the wonders of QuickCheck. :-)
One (obvious?) question that is not addressed in at least the original paper
is how one might use QC to automatically verify the algebraic laws
Some utility code is available in the
28 matches
Mail list logo
