#806: hGetBufNonBlocking doesn't work with -threaded on Windows
-+--
Reporter: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Owner:
Type: bug | Status: new
Priority: normal |
#690: Accept source files in encodings other than UTF-8
---+
Reporter: simonmar | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal| Milestone:
#690: Accept source files in encodings other than UTF-8
---+
Reporter: simonmar | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal| Milestone:
Hello GHC,
Monday, September 25, 2006, 4:55:52 PM, you wrote:
#806: hGetBufNonBlocking doesn't work with -threaded on Windows
is not it the same problem as my favorite
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/637 ?
i.e. lack of separate IO Manager thread makes it impossible to
implement
#908: Deriving MPTC panic: tcSplitTyConApp
-+--
Reporter: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Owner:
Type: bug | Status: closed
Priority: normal | Milestone:
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 12:23:27PM -0500, Brian Smith wrote:
I finished re-running the test suite with all the necessary libraries
installed.
Cool, thanks!
* utf8_002, utf8_003, utf8_004, utf8_005:
These tests all fail the same way, outputing:
utf8_002.hs:2:0: lexical error at end of
| Last question, is using fst/snd really a problem as I suspected by
| using the constant twice? (I actually didn't explicitly inline the
| constant by two calls of unsafePerfromIO.)
Using a constant twice should not duplicate the work of computing it, if
that's what you mean
S
[redirecting to GHC users, since it's a GHC-specific question]
Misha
| I asked this question on haskell-cafe once, but my post didn't get any
| responses, so I try once again here explaining a bit more where my
| problem comes from.
I was at ICFP.
| Suppose I have a monomorphic datatype,
Simon Peyton-Jones schrieb:
| instance Show [Equation]
| where
| showsPrec _ eqs = certain program which prints a list of equation
| in a `nicer' way than by the default list
[...]
Perhaps. That's what I'd like feedback about. What do others think?
Overlapping
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 09:43:03PM +1000, Jeremy Wazny wrote:
I've attempted to build an installation of GHC which uses
unregisterised libraries, but have not had much success. I am new to
GHC's build system and would be grateful for some advice.
I'm trying to build the 6.4.2 source
Hi Rich,
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 09:23:52AM -0500, Rich Fought wrote:
I've got some unit test code that forks off test processes using the
'system' function and then delays using 'threadDelay' to synchronize
with the test process.
This has worked fine until I upgraded to 6.4.2, now some
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 04:16:44PM +0200, Cyril Schmidt wrote:
As far as I can see, the current (6.4.2) GHC runtime
suffers the year 2038 problem; that is, the System.Time
module does not support dates from 2038 onwards
(the code below reproduces the problem).
We inherit the problem from C's
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 09:20:45PM +0200, Rene de Visser wrote:
Is there anyway to turn off that ghci runs in threaded mode on windows?
Only by recompiling, I'm afraid (for 6.4.2 comment out the line
SRC_HC_OPTS += -threaded in ghc/compiler/Makefile; for 6.5 you need to
also do so in
It wasn't in the list of exposed modules for the STM package. Thanks
for spotting this.
[Ian: pls push patch to the 6.6 branch]
Simon
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| On Behalf Of Josef Svenningsson
| Sent: 20 September 2006 11:19
| To: Bulat
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 08:45:30PM +0400, Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
Hello glasgow-haskell-users,
how about adding to the list of extra libs the following very useful ones:
I think we're too late in the release process to be adding libraries.
Also, I think we would like to move towards
Bulat,
I am afraid I would need the new Time library a little earlier than 2038,
because I am working on financial software where it is not uncommon to
have contracts
over 30 years long.
Is the new Time library available for download?
Regards,
Cyril
___
Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
there is new
Hi Bulat,
Thanks for the suggestions!
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 05:52:53PM +0400, Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
in GHC library paragraph - add a link to the API documentation. btw,
my download
(http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/current/dist/ghc-6.5.20060901-i386-unknown-mingw32.tar.gz)
don't
On 9/25/06, Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I recently wanted to pass a lookup table around a program. Rather than
having something explicitly typed as Map.Map I wrote a function that
assembled
a Map and then used Map.lookup to return a function, like this:
module Main where
import
Lemmih [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2006-09-25 21.20 +0200:
table :: [(String, Integer)] - String - Maybe Integer
table ls str = Map.lookup str fm
where fm = trace Trace: making the map $ Map.fromList ls
to:
table :: [(String, Integer)] - String - Maybe Integer
table ls = \str -
We are pleased to announce HAppS -- Haskell Application Server version 0.8.2.
HAppS is a Haskell web application server for building industrial strength
Internet applications safely, quickly, and easily. With HAppS you focus
entirely on application functionality implemented in your favorite
On 2006-09-24 at 01:59BST Neil Mitchell wrote:
As a side note, perhaps if you're shoving massive amounts of text into
a Haskell source file you want to either move to something more
structured (like haskell source extensions),
IIRC the original problem was MySQL statements, which really
call
David House wrote:
* What would be a compulsory feature list?
Ability to subscribe to forums by email and to post/followup by email.
Alternatively, or in addition, a two-way NNTP gateway.
(If you want us forum-allergic to participate in the discussions there,
that is.)
| I'm working on a project for which the solution is highly
| parallelizable. I've been writing it so far for GHC as a
single-threaded
| app. I'd like to be able to split the job into multiple pieces, and
| spawn different system threads for each piece, so they will run on
| separate CPUs. Either
Andreas, Nikunj, and others
I don't have any experience of using GHC to build XLLs, or getting VBA
to call Haskell via a DLL. However, this is something we'd like to be
easy and reliable using GHC. If any of you are experts on the VBA/DLL
side of the question, and can figure out what we should
On 23.09 15:00, Adam Langley wrote:
Erlang's bit syntax[1] is a great for building and breaking up binary
structures. I've knocked up something similar (although a little
clumsy) for Haskell:
http://www.imperialviolet.org/binary/bitsyntax/
I don't think GHC is to blame in this case. If you follow all the
API (ABI) guidelines for building XLLs things work fine.
But there's a lot of things to get right.
-- Lennart
On Sep 25, 2006, at 05:16 , Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
Andreas, Nikunj, and others
I don't have any
Hi,
3GLs: programming based on algorithms (C, Java, ...)
There are algorithms in Haskell
4GSs: domain-specific languages (SQL,...)
There are plenty of domain specific languages in Haskell, I'd call
Parsec one of them
5GLs: automatic problem solving (Mathematica, Prolog,...)
I wouldn't
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Ch. A. Herrmann wrote:
Dear Haskellers,
do you think that Haskell is a 3GL (third generation language) or a 5GL or
that the hierarchy of programming language generations is useless?
I see a problem if the potential of a language is evaluated according to
the
Hi,
and/or visual programming (Visual Basic,...)
I can only assume you are a) joking
a bit, yes
, or b) not a visual basic user.
also true
While Visual Basic is a much insulted language, I have a soft spot for
it. However, its not a Visual programming language - its a
Hi,
Henning Thielemann wrote:
assembly language (Assembler ist deutsch :-)
for mysterious reasons it entered the English world.
3GLs: programming based on algorithms (C, Java, ...)
4GSs: domain-specific languages (SQL,...)
5GLs: automatic problem solving (Mathematica, Prolog,...)
Hallo,
On 9/25/06, Ch. A. Herrmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Henning Thielemann wrote:
assembly language (Assembler ist deutsch :-)
for mysterious reasons it entered the English world.
'Assembly' is a language. 'Assembler' is a program.
--
-alex
http://www.ventonegro.org/
Ch == Ch A Herrmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ch Hi,
Hello,
I'd say very strong, lots of times a where is used thats making
use of laziness.
Ch I don't agree: where is often only used to program in a top-down
Ch style
I would say in a more declarative style, the where is closer to thinking
Bernie Pope answered:
1. Why do the rules of the monomorphism restriction explicitly mention
*simple* pattern bindings?
Where is the difference, especially as there is a translation to
simple pattern bindings?
Why should
p | a==b = 2
| otherwise = 3
be
Alex Queiroz wrote:
On 9/25/06, Ch. A. Herrmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Henning Thielemann wrote:
assembly language (Assembler ist deutsch :-)
for mysterious reasons it entered the English world.
'Assembly' is a language. 'Assembler' is a program.
All this is absolutely
Hello Ch.,
Monday, September 25, 2006, 5:14:15 PM, you wrote:
do you think that Haskell is a 3GL (third generation language) or a 5GL or
it's a BottomthGL language :)
--
Best regards,
Bulatmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
On 9/24/06, David House [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all.The recent thread on email vs. forums inspired a bit of interest toget some forum software on haskell.org. Were we to go ahead with this,I think it'd be great to have this software written in Haskell itself.
If you were to write all-new
On Mon, 2006-09-25 at 16:50 +0200, Jerzy Karczmarczuk wrote:
. . .
(For the CDC mainframes the assembly language was called Compass
[Comprehensive Assembler]. It was a 7648764GL. You could program
in it almost like in Lisp thanks to some very exquisite macros,
and add another set of macros
Planning Systems, Inc. has a job opportunity for Haskell programmers.
My synopsis is below, and the official description is at
http://www.plansys.com/careers/job_details.cfm?JobID=28
Write Haskell code for a US government contractor. Projects include a
high-assurance authorization system build
On 9/25/06, Brian Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/24/06, David House [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all.
The recent thread on email vs. forums inspired a bit of interest to
get some forum software on haskell.org. Were we to go ahead with this,
I think it'd be great to have this software
Ch == Ch A Herrmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
it's a BottomthGL language :)
Ch That's a religious statement. I was looking for some strong
Ch arguments for the nonbelievers that Haskell is a 5GL.
But what about nonbelievers in language classification by generation?
As already mentioned you
Max Vasin wrote:
Ch == Ch A Herrmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
it's a BottomthGL language :)
Ch That's a religious statement. I was looking for some strong
Ch arguments for the nonbelievers that Haskell is a 5GL.
But what about nonbelievers in language classification
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 24.09.2006, 13:02 +0100 schrieb David House:
* What would be a compulsory feature list?
Stating the obvious: Haskell Syntax Highlighting (I didn't see it
mentioned before, but that might be because of malaria)
Greetings,
Joachim
--
Joachim nomeata Breitner
mail: [EMAIL
On Mon, 2006-09-25 at 22:22 +0200, Christoph Herrmann wrote:
. . .
What Prolog really provides concerning automatic problem solving
is little: equation solving in term algebra; you can simulate that
in Haskell without much effort. On the other hand, I saw Haskell
classified as a 3GL. The
Nikunj,
The symptoms that you describe hint at some incorrect pointer handling.
I believe the culprit is that pesky BSTR. I will try to dig up the code
that
I wrote a while ago to pass a BSTR to Haskell.
Meanwhile, another hint. The GHC FAQ 1.4.1 says:
For utterly horrible reasons, programs
44 matches
Mail list logo
