John Launchbury and Levent Erkok wrote:
| We are trying to determine how important it is to have
| polymorphic let-bindings in the do-expression.
You cannot ask a question like this without explaining why
you are interested in this subject! :-) Just out of
curiosity... (I think that it is has
I quite appreciate the expressive power of Haskell, but of course it's
quite useless for real applications.
There's provocation for you! What I should say, is that it is too slow
for my application, which is to play the ancient game of Chu Shogi
(Middle Japanese Chess).
Anyway, a problem has
Dear Friend
I was recently browsing the web and came across an article HOW TO DO
EXCEPTIONS IN HASKELL (I think) and I'm very curious what it's all about.
The reason for my curiosity is simply that my name is Haskell and currently
reside in South Africa but am originally from Manchester in the
On Fri, 2 Jun 2000, Jerzy Karczmarczuk wrote:
I hope that this work will progress.
So it does. I started working on linear operators.
New version of the module is available for downloading.
Much still needs to be done, but the closure
formula is already
Koen Claessen wrote:
which you want to depend on a few state variables or
something, then I do the following:
funWrapper y = runST computation
where
computation =
do var - newSTRef []
let fun x = .. var .. x ..
fun y
Where is the polymorphism?
Lennart Augustsson wrote:
|funWrapper y = runST computation
| where
|computation =
| do var - newSTRef []
| let fun x = .. var .. x ..
| fun y
|
| Where is the polymorphism?
You're right! This was indeed a bad example. A better
example
On Sun, 04 Jun 2000, Koen Claessen wrote:
You cannot ask a question like this without explaining why
you are interested in this subject! :-) Just out of
curiosity... (I think that it is has to do with a recursive
do-translation, am I right?
Yes, we're working on a new semantics for do,
Sun, 4 Jun 2000 11:02:20 -0700, Levent Erkok [EMAIL PROTECTED] pisze:
Yes, we're working on a new semantics for do, where you'll be able
to bind variables recursively. For instance:
do xs - Just (1:xs)
return (take 5 xs)
Ah, like:
import MonadFix --
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk)
I'm curious how the generic translation into mfix could look like if
everything is visible everywhere ...
The implementation of recursive definitions when the right-hand sides
have computational effects is ancient (dates back to at least Landin's
How is Haskell pronouced?
That is, does it rhyme with "cell" like most words ending in "ell",
or does it rhyme with "cull" like in some names?
No one in this area has heard of Haskell. I'd like to speak the
correct name when I make people aware of Haskell.
Regards,
- John
Koen Claessen wrote:
I just went through my code and
looked at how many definitions in do-notation actually were
polymorphic.
And what was the result?
--
-- Lennart
Sven Panne ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] might be the more appropriate list.
A reader of that list asked me explicitly not to
send it to that list because he thought it wasn't
appropriate to sent cvs-bug messages to that list:-)
I'll send further error messages to cvs-ghc in
When I use hSelect in my code I get this message:
/usr/lib/ghc-4.06/libHSutil.a(Select__5.o): In function
`Select_zdwgetFd_fast2':Select__5.o(.text+0x73): undefined reference to
`PosixUtil_FDzh_con_info'
What did I do wrong?
I tried Suse Linux 6.4 precompiled binaries and compiled ghc-4.06
Thanks,
they are running now, but only at the end of my program.
Is their another possibility to speed this?
Or a possibility to see by which objects an object is reachable?
If I have structures:
data Subtest a = Subtest a
data Test = Test {subtest :: Subtest Int)
...and use somewhere
do
Ulrich Norbisrath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote,
When I use hSelect in my code I get this message:
/usr/lib/ghc-4.06/libHSutil.a(Select__5.o): In function
`Select_zdwgetFd_fast2':Select__5.o(.text+0x73): undefined reference to
`PosixUtil_FDzh_con_info'
What did I do wrong?
I tried Suse Linux
15 matches
Mail list logo
