#706: GHC uses _stub.c files regardless of whether any 'foreign import' decls
remain in a .hs file
-+--
Reporter: ncale...@uci.edu| Owner:
Type: bug |
#451: GHC poor type-checker error message
--+-
Reporter: isaacdupree | Owner:
Type: bug | Status: closed
Priority: normal
#3687: Merge _stub.o files back in to the .o file
-+--
Reporter: NeilMitchell | Owner:
Type: feature request | Status: new
Priority: normal| Component:
#3683: could not build ghc-6.12.0.20091121 under solaris
-+--
Reporter: maeder| Owner:
Type: bug | Status: new
Priority: normal|
#706: GHC uses _stub.c files regardless of whether any 'foreign import' decls
remain in a .hs file
-+--
Reporter: ncale...@uci.edu| Owner:
Type: bug |
#3687: Merge _stub.o files back in to the .o file
--+-
Reporter: NeilMitchell | Owner:
Type: feature request | Status: new
Priority: normal |
#3686: please remove huge ghc-tarballs/
---+
Reporter: juhpetersen | Owner:
Type: bug | Status: new
Priority: normal| Milestone:
#451: GHC poor type-checker error message
--+-
Reporter: isaacdupree | Owner:
Type: bug | Status: closed
Priority: normal
#3688: getOptions'.parseLanguage(2) went past eof token
+---
Reporter: guest| Owner:
Type: bug | Status: new
Priority: normal | Component: GHCi
Hello.
I am using Gentoo with hardened features enabled. Recently i want to
try yi-editor. I built GHC with emerge and nothing strange happened.
However, I got following error information when i built yi:
Building yi-0.6.1...
[ 1 of 119] Compiling System.FriendlyPath ( System/FriendlyPath.hs,
On 23/11/2009 16:53, Ian Lynagh wrote:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 01:41:30PM +1000, Jens Petersen wrote:
We are pleased to announce the second release candidate for GHC 6.12.1:
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/6.12.1-rc2/
Thank you!
For the Linux binary
distributions, the linux-n tarballs
On 24/11/2009 03:16, Daniel Schüssler wrote:
Hi,
see below.
Greetings,
Daniel
$ cabal install ghc-paths
Resolving dependencies...
[1 of 1] Compiling Main ( /tmp/ghc-paths-0.1.0.523651/ghc-
paths-0.1.0.5/Setup.hs, /tmp/ghc-paths-0.1.0.523651/ghc-
paths-0.1.0.5/dist/setup/Main.o
Thanks :)
Greetings,
Daniel
On Tuesday 24 November 2009 12:16:18 Simon Marlow wrote:
On 24/11/2009 03:16, Daniel Schüssler wrote:
Hi,
see below.
Greetings,
Daniel
$ cabal install ghc-paths
Resolving dependencies...
[1 of 1] Compiling Main (
On Sun, 2009-11-22 at 22:00 -0600, Tom Tobin wrote:
On Nov 22, 2009, at 11:53 AM, Ian Lynagh wrote:
Hi all,
We are pleased to announce the second release candidate for GHC 6.12.1:
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/6.12.1-rc2/
IIRC, an earlier 6.12 RC announcement mentioned that
The ghc documentation at
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/users_guide/packages.html
says the following:
-package-name foo
Tells GHC the the module being compiled forms part of package
foo. If this flag is omitted (a very common case) then the default
package main is
I'm very proud to announce a new revision of the Haskell language,
Haskell 2010. Over the last couple of months the committee has been
making final decisions about which extensions should be a part of this
revision. The final list is:
DoAndIfThenElse
HierarchicalModules
On 24 Nov 2009, at 10:50, Simon Marlow wrote:
I'm very proud to announce a new revision of the Haskell language,
Haskell 2010.
Hurrah!
* Compilers can start implementing the changes, and flags to
select the Haskell 2010 revision. In GHC we expect to have
support in the next major
First off congratulations everyone!
Second, Oh shit! Graham Hutton's excellent Haskell introduction book is now
not valid Haskell 2010 due to N+K patterns?
I loaned that book to my boss and he's really enjoyed it. I guess I'll have
to buy a revised copy. Can we get an update to it? :-)
I
I'm very proud to announce a new revision of the Haskell language,
Haskell 2010.
I stand up and cheer. It's great to see fruit from so many years of
effort, and I am very grateful to the Haskell-prime committee for all
this work, and for the improvements.
I look forward to using the new
Is there a way in which I can interface GHC with assembly language ?
Of course I can create a stub C function which using inline assembly,
compile it with GCC, and crankin the FFI of GHC. But is there a more
direct way ?
I would like to try coding, (or steal from some open source
implementation)
ppk:
Is there a way in which I can interface GHC with assembly language ?
Of course I can create a stub C function which using inline assembly,
compile it with GCC, and crankin the FFI of GHC. But is there a more
direct way ?
I would like to try coding, (or steal from some open source
What about using export keyword to mark the exporting functions?
___
Haskell-prime mailing list
Haskell-prime@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 05:46, Richard O'Keefe wrote:
For example, ai in Maori means to copulate,
Really [1]? It's amazing what Google [2] will tell you these days. ;)
[1] http://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/handle/2292/343
[2] http://www.google.com/search?q=ai+maori
Regards,
Sean
Robert Greayer robgrea...@gmail.com writes:
allow local modules.
module Foo where
module Bar where
data Bar = Bar { x :: Int, y :: Int }
module Baz where
data Baz = Baz { x :: Int, y :: Int }
f a b = Bar.x a + Baz.y b
Independent of TDNR I would welcome this.
I dream of mostly generated bindings for Haskell to the native windowing
toolkit.
Eclipse's SWT proves, this is a viable path.
See my proposal here:
http://www.reddit.com/r/haskell_proposals/comments/9w7nk/adjust_the_swt_binding_generators_for_haskell/
Sam Martin sam.mar...@geomerics.com hat am
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 7:13 PM, Ketil Malde ke...@malde.org wrote:
E.g. if module Foo.Bar isn't found in Foo/Bar.hs GHC could look in
Foo.hs (which would just contain a concatenation of what would currently
reside in Foo.hs and Foo/Bar.hs).
The obvious question arising here is what if module
1) the uncensored version
2) Monadam*
3) Monada**
4) Monad***
5) Mona
Putting stars in place of letters in no way makes a word less offensive.
Consider the word 'ing'.
It's about context. I think it's wise that such a word have a star put
in it in the weekly news or a journal
Hello,
Given this program:
{-# LANGUAGE Rank2Types #-}
newtype Region s a = Region a
unRegion :: forall a s. Region s a - a
unRegion (Region x) = x
runRegionPointfull :: forall a. (forall s. Region s a) - a
runRegionPointfull r =
Ben Millwood hask...@benmachine.co.uk writes:
E.g. if module Foo.Bar isn't found in Foo/Bar.hs GHC could look in
Foo.hs (which would just contain a concatenation of what would currently
reside in Foo.hs and Foo/Bar.hs).
The obvious question arising here is what if module Foo.Bar *is* found
Incidentally, I've always wondered about the politically correct
way of referring to this programming language (and related
implementation in the above-mentioned type system) in academic
circles;
Is this a question of politically correctness? Since there's no
discrimination or prejudice
On 24/11/2009 15:19, David Leimbach wrote:
First off congratulations everyone!
Second, Oh shit! Graham Hutton's excellent Haskell introduction book is
now not valid Haskell 2010 due to N+K patterns?
Right, but it's still valid Haskell 98, and we have no immediate plans
at least in GHC to
Hello. I'm new to this mailing list, so I apologize if this question is
inappropriate for this list, but I've been looking for a solution to
this problem for weeks and I've had no luck.
I am trying to write a program with HOpenGL and freeglut, but I can't
seem to get it to render. I'm running
It used to be, because GHC used to implement so-called deep skolemisation.
See Section 4.6.2 of
http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/people/simonpj/papers/higher-rank/putting.pdf
Deep skolemisation was an unfortunate casualty of the push to add impredicative
polymoprhism. However, as I
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 6:02 PM, Simon Peyton-Jones
simo...@microsoft.com wrote:
It used to be, because GHC used to implement so-called deep skolemisation.
See Section 4.6.2 of
http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/people/simonpj/papers/higher-rank/putting.pdf
Deep skolemisation was an
Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
It used to be, because GHC used to implement so-called deep skolemisation.
See Section 4.6.2 of
http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/people/simonpj/papers/higher-rank/putting.pdf
Deep skolemisation was an unfortunate casualty of the push to add impredicative
* For record selectors, currently written (x r), writing r.x is
exactly right
Algol 68 used 'x of r', which I always found rather readable.
COBOL has always used 'x of r' and 'x in r' with the same meaning.
BCPL uses 'f O§F r' which may I believe also be written 'f::r'.
Fortran uses 'r%x'.
On Nov 24, 2009, at 10:29 PM, Sean Leather wrote:
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 05:46, Richard O'Keefe wrote:
For example, ai in Maori means to copulate,
Really [1]? It's amazing what Google [2] will tell you these days. ;)
Really! Check
http://www.maoridictionary.co.nz/
In fact if you read
Is there anybody except me feeling the need for mailing list and issue
tracker for emacs' haskell-mode?
Mailing list is a forum to discuss ideas _and_ the area of patch
authors' self-advertisement. And issue tracker is a TODO list; it may
be useful or annoying, and I think we can live without one
-- Description of the attached dpatch:
* make `inferior-haskell-find-project-root' respect export lists
No joke this time. Sorry for the glitch.
--
vvv
Tue Nov 24 23:48:05 EET 2009 Valery V. Vorotyntsev valery...@gmail.com
* make `inferior-haskell-find-project-root' respect export lists
I cannot hoogle it. It appears in Pugs:
run' (-d:rest) = do
info - fmap Just (io $ newTVarIO Map.empty)
let ?debugInfo = info
run' rest
Sincerely!
-
fac n = foldr (*) 1 [1..n]
--
View this message in context:
Control.Concurrent.STM
On Nov 24, 2009, at 6:11 PM, zaxis wrote:
I cannot hoogle it. It appears in Pugs:
run' (-d:rest) = do
info - fmap Just (io $ newTVarIO Map.empty)
let ?debugInfo = info
run' rest
Sincerely!
-
fac n = foldr (*) 1 [1..n]
--
View this
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 11:11 PM, zaxis z_a...@163.com wrote:
I cannot hoogle it. It appears in Pugs:
run' (-d:rest) = do
info - fmap Just (io $ newTVarIO Map.empty)
let ?debugInfo = info
run' rest
Sincerely!
-
fac n = foldr (*) 1 [1..n]
--
View this
valery...@gmail.com (Valery V. Vorotyntsev) writes:
Is there anybody except me feeling the need for mailing list and issue
tracker for emacs' haskell-mode?
FWIW, you have my vote too. I'm convinced that a discussion forum and
tracker would foster contributions from the many emacs users in the
thanks! Maybe the hoogle shoud add it
Ross Mellgren wrote:
Control.Concurrent.STM
On Nov 24, 2009, at 6:11 PM, zaxis wrote:
I cannot hoogle it. It appears in Pugs:
run' (-d:rest) = do
info - fmap Just (io $ newTVarIO Map.empty)
let ?debugInfo = info
run'
I am trying to write an interpreter for a very simple untyped functional
language. I have a problem with mutually recursive let expressions, for
which my interpreter loops :(
This is a code snippet from the eval function:
eval :: Expr - Eval Value
eval (Let decls body) = mdo
let
The following code works fine for me, so it seems you are missing some
details that may help.
{-# LANGUAGE RecursiveDo, GeneralizedNewtypeDeriving,
TypeSynonymInstances, MultiParamTypeClasses #-}
import Control.Monad
import Control.Monad.State
import Control.Monad.Error
import
First of all: This is a release (very) early and often release
announcment. So expect that there are some minor glitches [5].
Linux is only supported at this moment. [1]
summary:
main goal: provide an environment (= list dependencies) to build a
haskell package with minimal
When developing my QuickCheck-2 test-suite for graphviz, I wrote the
following Arbitrary instance for FGL graphs (which needs
FlexibleInstances):
,
| instance (Graph g, Arbitrary n, Arbitrary e, Show n, Show e) = Arbitrary (g
n e) where
| arbitrary = do ns - liftM nub arbitrary
|
Hello cafe,
Does anybody knows if there is a Machine Learning Library for Haskell? I looked
in hackage and couldn't find anything but something for Data Mining but that's
not what I need, however, googling I saw a ticket for google summer of code for
writing such library proposed by Ketil
On Nov 18, 2009, at 7:28 AM, Manlio Perillo wrote:
The Unicode Standard (version 4.0, section 3.9, D31 - pag 76) says:
Because surrogate code points are not included in the set of Unicode
scalar values, UTF-32 code units in the range D800 .. DFFF are
ill-formed
The current version
Hector Guilarte hector...@gmail.com writes:
Ketil, has any progress been made on that library? Specially in the
SVM part which is what I'm really looking for...
No, the SoC ticket was not funded, and I am not aware of any other
Haskell implementation of SVMs (and if there is one, I'm sure it
look at: http://www.cs.utah.edu/~hal/SVMseq/
this works but is a little slow and would benefit by being updated to
use the bytestring library.
and generic data clustering ...
http://www.cs.utah.edu/~hal/GDC/
From: ke...@malde.org
To: hector...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe]
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 1:03 AM, Jose A. Ortega Ruiz j...@gnu.org wrote:
valery...@gmail.com (Valery V. Vorotyntsev) writes:
Is there anybody except me feeling the need for mailing list and issue
tracker for emacs' haskell-mode?
FWIW, you have my vote too. I'm convinced that a discussion
53 matches
Mail list logo
