On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 01:00:16AM -0400, Mark Lentczner wrote:
The Haddock team has spent the last few months revamping the look of the
generated output. We're pretty close to done, but we'd like to get the
community's input before we put it in the main release.
Please take a look, and
Hi Lars,
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Lars Viklund z...@acc.umu.se wrote:
The survey seems to be inactive, by the way.
It's because Mark already posted the results. :)
Cheers,
Johan
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
On 06/08/10 03:15, Jeff Zaroyko wrote:
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 11:48 PM, Johan Tibelljohan.tib...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Dino Morellid...@ui3.info wrote:
On Wed, 4 Aug 2010, Mark Lentczner wrote:
One thing I haven't seen anyone else comment on is the width of the
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Simon Marlow marlo...@gmail.com wrote:
The great thing about the Haddock redesign is that the content has been
separated from the style. If opinions about the style are sufficiently
divided we can provide a style switcher on the docs we ship with GHC, and
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 7:54 AM, Magnus Therning mag...@therning.org wrote:
jokeWouldn't the docs be unusable if it were in French even if
Haddock handled unicode characters correctly?/joke
Joke aside, for software to be released, a French documentation indeed
wouldn't be of much use. The
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Dino Morelli d...@ui3.info wrote:
One thing I haven't seen anyone else comment on is the width of the new
docs. I have a large (26) monitor and use the browser full-screen (with
xmonad, so even more screen space). When I load these pages, particularly
the
On Fri, 6 Aug 2010, Ben Millwood wrote:
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Dino Morelli d...@ui3.info wrote:
One thing I haven't seen anyone else comment on is the width of the new
docs. I have a large (26) monitor and use the browser full-screen (with
xmonad, so even more screen space). When I
I prefer the new look.
That being said, I'd rather like haddock handling unicode characters
in comments, at the moment it's unusable if I want to write comments
in French.
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 01:00, David Virebayre
dav.vire+hask...@gmail.com wrote:
I prefer the new look.
That being said, I'd rather like haddock handling unicode characters
in comments, at the moment it's unusable if I want to write comments
in French.
jokeWouldn't the docs be unusable if it
On Wed, 4 Aug 2010, Mark Lentczner wrote:
The Haddock team has spent the last few months revamping the look of the
generated output. We're pretty close to done, but we'd like to get the
community's input before we put it in the main release.
Please take a look, and then give us your feedback
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Dino Morelli d...@ui3.info wrote:
On Wed, 4 Aug 2010, Mark Lentczner wrote:
The Haddock team has spent the last few months revamping the look of the
generated output. We're pretty close to done, but we'd like to get the
community's input before we put it in
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Johan Tibell johan.tib...@gmail.com wrote:
One thing I haven't seen anyone else comment on is the width of the new
docs. I have a large (26) monitor and use the browser full-screen (with
xmonad, so even more screen space). When I load these pages, particularly
On Thu, 5 Aug 2010, Johan Tibell wrote:
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Dino Morelli d...@ui3.info wrote:
One thing I haven't seen anyone else comment on is the width of the new
docs. I have a large (26) monitor and use the browser full-screen (with
xmonad, so even more screen space). When I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/5/10 09:35 , Dino Morelli wrote:
Please say no, it's a disappointing trend that you see everywhere. Like
Twitter's web interface, for instance, very narrow.
Twitter's web interface isn't really intended for serious use, IMO.
Tweetdeck for
On 5 August 2010 23:35, Dino Morelli d...@ui3.info wrote:
On Wed, 4 Aug 2010, Mark Lentczner wrote:
One thing I haven't seen anyone else comment on is the width of the new
docs. I have a large (26) monitor and use the browser full-screen (with
xmonad, so even more screen space). When I load
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 11:48 PM, Johan Tibell johan.tib...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Dino Morelli d...@ui3.info wrote:
On Wed, 4 Aug 2010, Mark Lentczner wrote:
One thing I haven't seen anyone else comment on is the width of the new
docs. I have a large (26) monitor and
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 06:00, Mark Lentczner ma...@glyphic.com wrote:
The Haddock team has spent the last few months revamping the look of the
generated output. We're pretty close to done, but we'd like to get the
community's input before we put it in the main release.
Please take a look,
2010/8/4 Mark Lentczner ma...@glyphic.com:
The Haddock team has spent the last few months revamping the look of the
generated output. We're pretty close to done, but we'd like to get the
community's input before we put it in the main release.
Please take a look, and then give us your
Magnus Therning mag...@therning.org writes:
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 06:00, Mark Lentczner ma...@glyphic.com wrote:
The Haddock team has spent the last few months revamping the look of the
generated output. We're pretty close to done, but we'd like to get the
community's input before we put
Ivan Lazar Miljenovic ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 06:00, Mark Lentczner ma...@glyphic.com wrote:
Frame version: http://www.ozonehouse.com/mark/snap-xhtml/frames.html
I quite like this new approach
Dammit, I just realised as I went to do the survey that the old
On Aug 4, 2010, at 5:11 AM, Magnus Therning wrote:
Does the current stable version of Haddock really
create a frame version?
I've never seen one before...
Yes it does. For example, the standaed GHC book packages doc has the frames
version here:
Great! I like it a lot, but a couple of minor suggestions regarding the
tree view of modules. I think it would be more attractive (and
space-efficient) to have them indent a little less and to provide some sort
of visual link, in the form of even subtle branches, from parents to
children. A bit
On 4 August 2010 10:11, Magnus Therning mag...@therning.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 06:00, Mark Lentczner ma...@glyphic.com wrote:
The Haddock team has spent the last few months revamping the look of the
generated output. We're pretty close to done, but we'd like to get the
community's
Mark Lentczner wrote:
The Haddock team...
Please take a look, and then give us your feedback
Very very nice. I took the survey, but here are some comments
I left out.
I like the idea of the Snappy style the best, but there are two
serious problems with it, at least in my browser (Safari):
1.
A few points,
* The text in Synopsis part is typically wide. (See
http://www.ozonehouse.com/mark/snap-xhtml/heist/Text-Templating-Heist.htmlwith
Ocean style)
I think it would be more *usable *if it was at the bottom of the page (again
with a similar button and open/close toggling effect)
* On my
I really like the color scheme and the Javadoc looking frames.
One suggestion I can make is to have the index show all the functions with
type signatures without having to pick a letter. A lot of times I'll be
looking for a function of a certain signature as opposed to a name. Indeed
an index of
On 4 August 2010 15:44, aditya siram aditya.si...@gmail.com wrote:
I really like the color scheme and the Javadoc looking frames.
One suggestion I can make is to have the index show all the functions with
type signatures without having to pick a letter. A lot of times I'll be
looking for a
This is something I've wanted for a long time, but I always intended
to just submit a patch since it would be trivial, but maybe other
people have an opinion about it too:
I've always wanted a button to collapse or maybe toggle all expanded
branches. Once a library gets large, it's easier to
Great work!
I'm sure you're already aware of
http://sphinx.pocoo.org/
which is used to generate the Python docs. A lot of good ideas there.
One thing which would be great would be to integrate their javascript
in-browser text search engine. Obviously not a priority but it might
be nice.
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 1:00 AM, Mark Lentczner ma...@glyphic.com wrote:
The Haddock team has spent the last few months revamping the look of the
generated output. We're pretty close to done, but we'd like to get the
community's input before we put it in the main release.
Please take a look,
On 10-08-04 01:00 AM, Mark Lentczner wrote:
Sample pages: http://www.ozonehouse.com/mark/snap-xhtml/index.html
On the Contents page, among the collapsable trees: when I click on a
link that is also a parent, such as Snap.Http.Server and
Text.Templating.Heist, it has the undesirable side
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 2:11 AM, Magnus Therning mag...@therning.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 06:00, Mark Lentczner ma...@glyphic.com wrote:
The Haddock team has spent the last few months revamping the look of the
generated output. We're pretty close to done, but we'd like to get the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/4/10 05:11 , Magnus Therning wrote:
Also very good looking. Does the current stable version of Haddock really
create a frame version?
I've never seen one before...
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/current/html/libraries/frames.html
- --
The Haddock team has spent the last few months revamping the look of the
generated output. We're pretty close to done, but we'd like to get the
community's input before we put it in the main release.
Please take a look, and then give us your feedback through a short survey
Sample pages:
34 matches
Mail list logo
