Re: Final word on OpenAL?

2009-04-29 Thread Duncan Coutts
On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 18:25 +0200, Sven Panne wrote: > Am Dienstag, 28. April 2009 03:24:23 schrieb Mikhail Glushenkov: > > what is the final word regarding inclusion of OpenAL? I for one > > would vote against including it, since it is not essential IMO > > and can be always added later. [...] >

Re: Final word on OpenAL?

2009-04-29 Thread Duncan Coutts
On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 01:24 +, Mikhail Glushenkov wrote: > Hi all, > > what is the final word regarding inclusion of OpenAL? I for one > would vote against including it, since it is not essential IMO > and can be always added later. > Second, what is the current target release date for 2009.0

Re: Where is the best place to report bugs

2009-04-29 Thread Duncan Coutts
On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 11:25 +0200, Luis Cabellos wrote: > Hi, > >where is the best place to report bugs? There's the platform trac: http://trac.haskell.org/haskell-platform/ >e.g. make raises the error: >/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgmp > >I think the problem is ./configure in ge

Where is the best place to report bugs

2009-04-29 Thread Luis Cabellos
Hi, where is the best place to report bugs? e.g. make raises the error: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgmp I think the problem is ./configure in generic unix tarball doesn't check gmp -- LC, ("There is no Dana, only Zuul." - Cazafantasmas [1984]) ___

Re: Patches for generic Haskell Platform tarball

2009-04-29 Thread Duncan Coutts
On Sun, 2009-04-26 at 18:29 +0200, Benedikt Huber wrote: > Hi, > I've tested the generic unix tarball on Mac Os X and found a few > problems: > 1) configure.ac: does not call AC_CANONICAL_TARGET, therefore > $target_os is not set. > 2) build.sh/tell: Bash function does not work properly when ar

Re: Release dates

2009-04-29 Thread Bulat Ziganshin
Hello Duncan, Wednesday, April 29, 2009, 1:58:33 PM, you wrote: > Releases: > * 2009.2.0, Monday 4th May > * 2009.2.1, Monday 1st June (4 weeks after .0) > * 2009.2.2, Monday 13th July (6 weeks after .1) are you sure that 1) releasers will work due the Summer, 2) users are

Release dates

2009-04-29 Thread Duncan Coutts
All, So, release dates. We're supposed to be doing time-based releases. Let's pick some dates! Releases: * 2009.2.0, Monday 4th May * 2009.2.1, Monday 1st June (4 weeks after .0) * 2009.2.2, Monday 13th July (6 weeks after .1) First release is very soon (this coming Mond

Re: Release dates

2009-04-29 Thread Duncan Coutts
On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 14:11 +0400, Bulat Ziganshin wrote: > Hello Duncan, > > Wednesday, April 29, 2009, 1:58:33 PM, you wrote: > > Releases: > > * 2009.2.0, Monday 4th May > > * 2009.2.1, Monday 1st June (4 weeks after .0) > > * 2009.2.2, Monday 13th July (6 weeks after .1

Re: Release dates

2009-04-29 Thread Mikhail Glushenkov
Hi Duncan, Duncan Coutts writes: > Comments? Does this seem reasonable and realistic? Fine by me. I'll upload the RC installer during the next few days. ___ Haskell-platform mailing list Haskell-platform@projects.haskell.org http://projects.haskel

Re: Where is the best place to report bugs

2009-04-29 Thread Luis Cabellos
it works, but I needed to install libgmp. The point is is to add the libgmp check on configure. On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Duncan Coutts wrote: > On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 11:25 +0200, Luis Cabellos wrote: >> Hi, >> >>    where is the best place to report bugs? > > There's the platform trac: >

Re: Release dates

2009-04-29 Thread Luis Cabellos
Maybe, it worth to change releases number to time-based numbering e.g: * 2009.05.04 instead 2009.2.0 * 2009.06.01 instead 2009.2.1 * 2009.07.13 instead 2009.2.2 On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Duncan Coutts wrote: > All, > > So, release dates. We're supposed to be doing time-based

Re: Release dates

2009-04-29 Thread Duncan Coutts
On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 13:25 +0200, Luis Cabellos wrote: > Maybe, it worth to change releases number to time-based numbering > > e.g: > * 2009.05.04 instead 2009.2.0 > * 2009.06.01 instead 2009.2.1 > * 2009.07.13 instead 2009.2.2 Not all releases are equal. We need an indication of maj

Re: Release dates

2009-04-29 Thread Mikhail Glushenkov
Hi Duncan, Duncan Coutts writes: > It's not as simple as I'd like. Does anyone have any better suggestions > that fit our requirements? What about 2009.1.0-beta1 ? ___ Haskell-platform mailing list Haskell-platform@projects.haskell.org http://proj

Re: Release dates

2009-04-29 Thread Duncan Coutts
On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 15:05 +, Mikhail Glushenkov wrote: > Hi Duncan, > > Duncan Coutts writes: > > > It's not as simple as I'd like. Does anyone have any better suggestions > > that fit our requirements? > > What about 2009.1.0-beta1 ? Sadly we do not have the luxury of strings in our ver

Re: Release dates

2009-04-29 Thread Luis Cabellos
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Duncan Coutts wrote: > On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 13:25 +0200, Luis Cabellos wrote: >> Maybe, it worth to change releases number to time-based numbering >> >> e.g: >>   * 2009.05.04   instead 2009.2.0 >>   * 2009.06.01   instead 2009.2.1 >>   * 2009.07.13   instead 2009