On 14-Aug-1998, Timothy Robin BARBOUR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
"David" == David Glen JEFFERY [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David Depending on how you do it, the choice of ORB may not be
David such a huge issue. Our (infantile) Mercury implementation
David does not talk to the ORB
"Sigbjorn" == Sigbjorn Finne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sigbjorn Advice on what's the most appropriate ORB to target
Sigbjorn would be greatly appreciated, there's already quite a
Sigbjorn selection to choose from (ORBit, Mico, omniORB etc.)
omniORB2 is CORBA-2 and IIOP compliant
"Marko" == Marko Schuetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marko FYI, there is also MICO:
Marko http://www.vsb.cs.uni-frankfurt.de/~mico/
The MICO home page says:
The difference to other free imlementations is, that MICO is developed for
educational
purposes [...]
As opposed to use
From: Daan Leijen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
Allthough we have made a binding now for COM, it would indeed be great
if we could also have a CORBA binding; it is of vital importance that
Haskell can talk with the outside world and the more languages it knows, the
better :-)
Since there is a
From: Daan Leijen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
Allthough we have made a binding now for COM, it would indeed be great
if we could also have a CORBA binding; it is of vital importance that
Haskell can talk with the outside world and the more languages it knows, the
better :-)
Since there is a
Manuel M. T. Chakravarty writes:
[snip]
Although, you continue with
Ideally, it should be possible to substitute COM for any
other component technology. Experience may prove
otherwise, but implementing an interface to one component
technology is a non-trivial amount of work,
From: Sigbjorn Finne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lennart Augustsson writes:
I am quite unhappy to see these developments (e.g.,
H/Direct) being based on some proprietary standards, as it
means that they are rather useless to me.
I agree!
Mud sticks, so may I suggest you actually
From: Timothy Robin BARBOUR [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Sigbjorn" == Sigbjorn Finne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sigbjorn As part of H/Direct, we're going to support something
Sigbjorn similar to JNI for the new Hugs/GHC system, see
Sigbjorn
On 09-Aug-1998, Erik Meijer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Tim,
The Haskell Server page claims that one advantage of COM is that it
"ships for free with windows". This suggests that the existence of a
genuinely free CORBA ORB has been overlooked.
IMHO ignoring CORBA is cutting Haskell off
I am quite unhappy to see these developments (e.g.,
H/Direct) being based on some proprietary standards, as it
means that they are rather useless to me.
Lets clarify some points:
- H/Direct is a OSF DCE IDL compiler which can not only
generate COM specific bindings but also for example
Manuel M. T. Chakravarty writes:
..
I am quite unhappy to see these developments (e.g.,
H/Direct) being based on some proprietary standards, as it
means that they are rather useless to me.
Sigh, it's not *based* on proprietary standards - whatever gave you
that idea? The IDL compiler
Hi Tim,
The Haskell Server page claims that one advantage of COM is that it
"ships for free with windows". This suggests that the existence of a
genuinely free CORBA ORB has been overlooked.
IMHO ignoring CORBA is cutting Haskell off from the open software
world (including about 7 million Linux
Timothy Robin BARBOUR writes:
"Sigbjorn" == Sigbjorn Finne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sigbjorn As part of H/Direct, we're going to support something
Sigbjorn similar to JNI for the new Hugs/GHC system, see
Sigbjornhttp://www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/fp/software/hdirect
[...]
"Sigbjorn" == Sigbjorn Finne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sigbjorn As part of H/Direct, we're going to support something
Sigbjorn similar to JNI for the new Hugs/GHC system, see
Sigbjornhttp://www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/fp/software/hdirect
[...]
Sigbjorn This document expresses the
14 matches
Mail list logo
