Re: [HCP-Users] -surface-distortion -local-affine-method

2018-04-04 Thread Harms, Michael
That feature isn’t yet in the released wb_command. Try using the latest “released” version of the Pipelines from GitHub, rather than the master branch. -- Michael Harms, Ph.D. --- Associate Professor of Psychiatry Washington University

[HCP-Users] -surface-distortion -local-affine-method

2018-04-04 Thread Moataz Assem
Hi, I am trying to run the PostFreeSurfer step using the latest Pipelines-master (downloaded today 04 April 2018 from github) but I get an error while running the script FreeSurfer2CaretConvertAndRegisterNonlinear.sh: ERROR: Unexpected parameter: -local-affine-method It seems the wb_command

Re: [HCP-Users] questions about using HCP surface ROIs in prob-tracking

2018-04-04 Thread Xinyang Liu
Dear Matthew, Thank you very much for your detailed explanation! 1. The current situation of our study is that, we used the HCP MMP1.0 atlas to sample the tfMRI data in order to localize specific functional areas. Since the HCP MMP1.0 is in the MNI space, we used

Re: [HCP-Users] questions about using HCP surface ROIs in prob-tracking

2018-04-04 Thread Glasser, Matthew
1. Files in ${StudyFolder}/${Subject}/T1w are in subject’s physical space and files in ${StudyFolder}/${Subject}/MNINonLinear are in MNI standard space. Surfaces without MSMAll are registered with MSMSulc and surfaces with MSMAll are registered with MSMAll. In general MSMAll will have better

Re: [HCP-Users] questions about using HCP surface ROIs in prob-tracking

2018-04-04 Thread Xinyang Liu
Dear Matthew, Thank you very much for your kind reply! Could I continue asking two more new questions? 1. In the preprocessed structural data, both the /${Subject}/T1w/fsaverage_LR32k and /${Subject}/MNINonLinear/fsaverage_LR32k contain white surface files with the same names, such as