Re: [HCP-Users] cifti-gradient vs. cifti-correlation-gradient, also volume-based dense connectomes

2016-08-17 Thread Ely, Benjamin
...@wustl.edu] Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 1:16 PM To: Ely, Benjamin; HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] cifti-gradient vs. cifti-correlation-gradient, also volume-based dense connectomes Hi Ely, 1. The idea is to look for differences in connectivity patterns, rather than

Re: [HCP-Users] cifti-gradient vs. cifti-correlation-gradient, also volume-based dense connectomes

2016-08-17 Thread Glasser, Matthew
in" <benjamin@mssm.edu<mailto:benjamin@mssm.edu>> Date: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 at 11:58 AM To: "HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org>" <HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org>> Subject: [HCP-

[HCP-Users] cifti-gradient vs. cifti-correlation-gradient, also volume-based dense connectomes

2016-08-17 Thread Ely, Benjamin
Hi team HCP, I have two semi-related questions about generating resting-state gradients: 1) What is the theoretical motivation behind using cifti-correlation-gradient rather than cifti-gradient to generate a resting-state gradient .dscalar.nii from a .dconn.nii file, per this thread (