to implement these changes.
Many thanks for the suggestion!
Lenore
Lenore Bell
Israel Judaica Section / Asian Middle Eastern Division / Library of Congress
(202) 707-7313 / l...@loc.gov
Barry Walfish barry.walf...@utoronto.ca 2/2/2010 9:52 AM
I guess this is for Lenore, but I'm curious
,
inidcating that such headings do not need to be established editorially
in LCSH.
Please let me know if further clarification is needed.
Happy new year!
Lenore
Lenore Bell
Israel Judaica Section / Asian Middle Eastern Division / Library of
Congress
(202) 707-7313 / l...@loc.gov
Roger Kohn r
a specific subject is mentioned, for
example, Colors in the Bible...
b. References. Do not make any used for, broader term, or related term
references.
Kol tuv,
Lenore
Lenore Bell
Israel Judaica Section / Asian Middle Eastern Division / Library of Congress
(202) 707-7313 / [EMAIL PROTECTED
Dear Colleagues,
I highly recommend that when we discuss this topic, we use Joan's excellent
examples document/discussion paper as a guide.
Joan didn't mention in her messages, but LC's Hebraica cataloging staff devoted
a number of meetings to these issues, and managed only to reach consensus
Dear Heidi,
SCM H980 2. directs us to Qualify subject headings for geographic
features or other entities that are located entirely within one of these
places [e.g., Golan] by the appropriate territory or city.
The examples provided are all geographic headings established in the
Subject Authority
From the script, looks like it should be romanized Le-natseaḥ. We'll
check it out at LC. Thanks!
Lenore
Yossi Galron [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/29/07 12:44 PM
In LCCN2007363607
*Li-netsoaḥ et Hiṭler / Avraham Burg *
--
Daniel,
I would like to ask for a few moments to solicit volunteers who would be
willing to assist with a project to add Hebrew script captions to the LC
Classification schedules for subclasses BM and KBM.
Thanks,
Lenore
Daniel Lovins [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/05/07 10:26 AM
Hi Stanley.
I'm
Library
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lenore
Bell
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 12:00 PM
To: heb-naco@lists.acs.ohio-state.edu
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: AJL 2007 call for speakers / non-roman practices
Library Cataloging Metadata Center
Charles E. Young Research Library
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lenore
Bell
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 12:00 PM
To: heb-naco@lists.acs.ohio-state.edu
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Colleagues: FYI from the CATALOGING POLICY AND SUPPORT OFFICE EDITORIAL
MEETING NUMBER 51, SUMMARY OF DECISIONS (December 20, 2006)
Catalogers should note that the subdivision --Prayer-books and devotions has
been changed to the form --Prayers and devotions, and that this new
subdivision is
them into the Confluence comments wiki for you.
I'm trying to keep track of our committee efforts at
http://www.library.yale.edu/~dlovins/ajl/index.html
Thanks.
Daniel
At 06:08 PM 8/22/2006, Lenore Bell wrote:
Dear Daniel,
Many thanks for considering RDA proposal 5JSC/LC/8, and for urging
Dear Daniel,
Many thanks for considering RDA proposal 5JSC/LC/8, and for urging Cataloging
Committee members to do the same.
As I mentioned at the convention, LC Hebraica Team members in general preferred
other approaches (see http://www.loc.gov/catdir/cpso/BibleOTtable7.pdf), but
accepted
FYI:
LC staff will not be implementing these 14 new MARC 21 characters until testing
has been completed with LC's bibliographic partners. CPSO plans to post
revisions to several Library of Congress Rule Interpretations relevant to the
new characters, and will notify LC staff when to implement
Daniel,
The wording regarding the non-roman script issues appropriately addresses
concerns to our specialized library/research community, which have not been
raised previously.
Thanks for sharing this latest draft.
Lenore
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/07/06 11:33 AM
Lenore,
I'm convinced now
FYI:
Of special interest are LC's proposals 5JSC/LC/5 [Internationalization] and
5JSC/LC/8 [Bible Uniform titles].
Lenore
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/20/06 1:36 PM
After the positive response to making drafts of RDA available on the JSC Web
site, the JSC has now also made its working documents
Daniel,
Thanks for sharing your revised draft and for incorporating the feedback you
received.
I very much agree that the Casalini issue should not be mentioned. The
developments related to contract negotations with a commerical vendor differ
greatly from the type of policy making which
Dear Daniel and Colleagues,
Thank you for sharing this carefully crafted draft letter. As part of LC
management (although not involved with the final decision on series), I am in
an awkward position with regard to participating in this response to LC.
Nevertheless, as an AJL colleague, I
Yossi--I always forget to copy you when I post to the list! I am resending my
message.
Lenore Bell 06/01/06 11:02 AM
Dear Daniel and Colleagues,
Thank you for sharing this carefully crafted draft letter. As part of LC
management (although not involved with the final decision on series), I
Yossi--I always forget to copy you when I post to the list! I am resending my
message. Thanks!
Lenore Bell 06/01/06 11:02 AM
Dear Daniel and Colleagues,
Thank you for sharing this carefully crafted draft letter. As part of LC
management (although not involved with the final decision
In the current implementation of the new series policy, LC will continue to
provide parallel roman/non-roman paired 490's. Lenore
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/31/06 6:02 PM
Dear Daniel and Safranim,
I think it is important to point out the uniqueness of materials we catalog
in multiple languages
Jasmin,
Your questions really relate more to collections management policies rather
than cataloging policies. You should consult with those at your library
responsible for collections management decisions.
At LC, it is the Hebraic Section, as a custodial unit, which is responsible for
Jasmin:
When LC Hebraica catalogers use records created by other institutions as source
copy, our practice is to supply the parallel Hebrew script data in our RLIN
records only for core fields (245, 250, 260, 4XX). We do not routinely add
non-roman data for other fields, if lacking, but do
transcriptions.
Examples:
Joan Biella Lenore Bell
rev. 7-15-05
IMHO, I do not think that *identifying* the source of the chronogram is
bibliographically significant, and would advise against incorprating this idea
into the rules, even on an optional basis.
My understanding is that we should be thinking in terms of recommendations that
make the rules
://www.loc.gov/catdir/cpso/parks2.html
Lenore
Lenore Bell
Team Leader, Hebraica Team
Regional and Cooperative Cataloging Division
Library of Congress
(202) 707-7313
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Got it! Thanks to Yossi for his efforts in resolving this problem! Lenore
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 4/14/2004 11:23:32 AM
I just got a notice from LC that the problem with Heb-NACO was solved. This
is a test message.
Yossi
up to test the system at http://desktop.loc.gov/
The Cataloging Distribution Service is interested in your feedback.
Lenore Bell
Team Leader, Hebraica Team
Regional and Cooperative Cataloging Division
Library of Congress
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
202-707-7313
27 matches
Mail list logo