On Wed, 30 Nov 2016, Henry B (Hank) Hotz, CISSP wrote:
> So it’s no longer possible to have non-numeric version numbers?
>
> Please understand, I don’t really care. The new system is logical enough,
> even if unconventional. Just wondering what the actual reason was.
This unconventional system
Non-numeric version numbers are not portable.
On 11/30/2016 6:00 PM, Henry B (Hank) Hotz, CISSP wrote:
> So it’s no longer possible to have non-numeric version numbers?
>
> Please understand, I don’t really care. The new system is logical enough,
> even if unconventional. Just wondering what
So it’s no longer possible to have non-numeric version numbers?
Please understand, I don’t really care. The new system is logical enough, even
if unconventional. Just wondering what the actual reason was.
> On Nov 30, 2016, at 12:02 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
>
> --On
+1
> On Nov 30, 2016, at 12:09 PM, Harald Barth wrote:
>
>
>>> While I’m asking, why are we renaming 1.7 as 7.x?
>
> I am more exited that there is work going on on a new release than I
> am worried about the numbering now being 7.X instead of 1.7.X. As long
> as the new number
Subject: Re: Heimdal 7 Release candidate 1 (7.0.1) available Date: Wed, Nov 30,
2016 at 09:09:39PM +0100 Quoting Harald Barth (h...@kth.se):
>
> >> While I’m asking, why are we renaming 1.7 as 7.x?
>
> I am more exited that there is work going on on a new release than I
>> While I’m asking, why are we renaming 1.7 as 7.x?
I am more exited that there is work going on on a new release than I
am worried about the numbering now being 7.X instead of 1.7.X. As long
as the new number is bigger than the old one everything should be fine.
;-)
Harald.
--On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 2:56 PM -0500 Jeffrey Hutzelman
wrote:
Good question. I look forward to hearing the answer.
All of this was already discussed in the 10/19/2016 email from Roland
Dowdeswell email with the subject "Preparing for the Heimdal 7 Release".
On Wed, 2016-11-30 at 11:38 -0800, Henry B (Hank) Hotz, CISSP wrote:
> Yay!
>
> Did I miss a 7.0 release? Also why does 7.0.1rcX automatically become
> 7.1?
No. Apparently the next real release will be 7.1, and they're spelling
"7.1 release candidate 1" as "7.0.1". I'm not sure what the
Yay!
Did I miss a 7.0 release? Also why does 7.0.1rcX automatically become 7.1?
While I’m asking, why are we renaming 1.7 as 7.x?
> On Nov 29, 2016, at 8:02 PM, Viktor Dukhovni
> wrote:
>
> Dear Heimdal Community,
>
> As promised in:
>
>
>