Re: Heimdal 7 Release candidate 1 (7.0.1) available

2016-12-01 Thread Marcin Cieslak
On Wed, 30 Nov 2016, Henry B (Hank) Hotz, CISSP wrote: > So it’s no longer possible to have non-numeric version numbers? > > Please understand, I don’t really care. The new system is logical enough, > even if unconventional. Just wondering what the actual reason was. This unconventional system

Re: Heimdal 7 Release candidate 1 (7.0.1) available

2016-11-30 Thread Jeffrey Altman
Non-numeric version numbers are not portable. On 11/30/2016 6:00 PM, Henry B (Hank) Hotz, CISSP wrote: > So it’s no longer possible to have non-numeric version numbers? > > Please understand, I don’t really care. The new system is logical enough, > even if unconventional. Just wondering what

Re: Heimdal 7 Release candidate 1 (7.0.1) available

2016-11-30 Thread Henry B (Hank) Hotz, CISSP
So it’s no longer possible to have non-numeric version numbers? Please understand, I don’t really care. The new system is logical enough, even if unconventional. Just wondering what the actual reason was. > On Nov 30, 2016, at 12:02 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: > > --On

Re: Heimdal 7 Release candidate 1 (7.0.1) available

2016-11-30 Thread Henry B (Hank) Hotz, CISSP
+1 > On Nov 30, 2016, at 12:09 PM, Harald Barth wrote: > > >>> While I’m asking, why are we renaming 1.7 as 7.x? > > I am more exited that there is work going on on a new release than I > am worried about the numbering now being 7.X instead of 1.7.X. As long > as the new number

Re: Heimdal 7 Release candidate 1 (7.0.1) available

2016-11-30 Thread Måns Nilsson
Subject: Re: Heimdal 7 Release candidate 1 (7.0.1) available Date: Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 09:09:39PM +0100 Quoting Harald Barth (h...@kth.se): > > >> While I’m asking, why are we renaming 1.7 as 7.x? > > I am more exited that there is work going on on a new release than I

Re: Heimdal 7 Release candidate 1 (7.0.1) available

2016-11-30 Thread Harald Barth
>> While I’m asking, why are we renaming 1.7 as 7.x? I am more exited that there is work going on on a new release than I am worried about the numbering now being 7.X instead of 1.7.X. As long as the new number is bigger than the old one everything should be fine. ;-) Harald.

Re: Heimdal 7 Release candidate 1 (7.0.1) available

2016-11-30 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 2:56 PM -0500 Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote: Good question.  I look forward to hearing the answer. All of this was already discussed in the 10/19/2016 email from Roland Dowdeswell email with the subject "Preparing for the Heimdal 7 Release".

Re: Heimdal 7 Release candidate 1 (7.0.1) available

2016-11-30 Thread Jeffrey Hutzelman
On Wed, 2016-11-30 at 11:38 -0800, Henry B (Hank) Hotz, CISSP wrote: > Yay! > > Did I miss a 7.0 release? Also why does 7.0.1rcX automatically become > 7.1? No.  Apparently the next real release will be 7.1, and they're spelling "7.1 release candidate 1" as "7.0.1".  I'm not sure what the

Re: Heimdal 7 Release candidate 1 (7.0.1) available

2016-11-30 Thread Henry B (Hank) Hotz, CISSP
Yay! Did I miss a 7.0 release? Also why does 7.0.1rcX automatically become 7.1? While I’m asking, why are we renaming 1.7 as 7.x? > On Nov 29, 2016, at 8:02 PM, Viktor Dukhovni > wrote: > > Dear Heimdal Community, > > As promised in: > > >