Hi,
Are there some new thoughts about the issue? I don't think this email was
answered after it was sent a few months ago.
Regards,
*Sylvain Fournier*
Operations Research Manager
*48 3239-2428*
WPLEX Software Ltda.
Rod SC 401 no. 8600 Corporate Park bloco 5 sala 101
88050-000 Santo Antôn
Hi Andrew,
How is the attempt to solving the bug I reported? I recently downloaded the
newest version of GLPK (4.65) and it is still crashing. If it was not
solved yet, could you please provide me with the fix you had sent at that
time?
Thanks!
*Sylvain Fournier*
Gerente de Pesquisa Operacional
Hi Bjørnar,
You may find some ideas from the number partitioning problem:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partition_problem
Regards,
*Sylvain Fournier*
On 26 May 2017 at 01:25, Andrew Makhorin wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-05-25 at 13:54 +0200, Bjørnar Ness wrote:
> > Hello, glpk
> &g
It seems to work fine with this option. Thanks Heinrich!
*Sylvain Fournier*
2015-12-03 15:16 GMT-02:00 Heinrich Schuchardt :
> Hello Sylvain,
>
> ./configure --help
>
> proposes:
>
> --enable-libpathload GLPK library from java.library.path
>
iss something, such as a compilation parameter that would help me?
If not, wouldn't it possible to add (also for Linux)
this System.loadLibrary("glpk") before the System.loadLibrary("glpk_java")
in glpk.i?
I am not sure I was very clear... But I hope you understood anywa
Thanks Heinrich!
http://sourceforge.net/projects/winglpk/ still contains the old libraries,
right? I'll test it after the next update and let you know if there is any
problem.
And what about providing the Linux libraries in the next releases?
*Sylvain Fournier*
2015-11-30 18:54 GMT-
iling the libraries when I have to update GLPK, but then I'd like to
understand why the libraries are given for Windows and not for Linux.
Regards,
*Sylvain Fournier*
2015-11-08 23:27 GMT-02:00 Heinrich Schuchardt :
> GLPK for Windows 4.57 has been released. It provides 32
e basis invalid, wouldn't it?)
*Sylvain Fournier*
Analista de Pesquisa Operacional
*48 3239-2423*
WPLEX Software Ltda.
Rod SC 401 no. 8600 Corporate Park bloco 5 sala 101
88050-000 Santo Antônio de Lisboa, Florianópolis SC +55 48 3239-2400
wplex.com.br
[image: WPLEX]
2014-03-22 4:23 GMT-0
00: obj = 8.626295607e+04 infeas = 3.034e-14 (3)
*224500: obj = 8.625357631e+04 infeas = 1.348e-14 (3)
*225000: obj = 8.625218764e+04 infeas = 1.569e-14 (3)
*225500: obj = 8.624515500e+04 infeas = 1.173e-14 (3)
*225775: obj = 8.624472901e+04 infeas = 1.272e-14 (3)
OPTIMAL SOLUTION FOU
Hello Heinrich,
Thanks for the explanations.
Best regards,
*Sylvain Fournier*
Analista de Pesquisa Operacional
*48 3239-2423*
WPLEX Software Ltda.
Rod SC 401 no. 8600 Corporate Park bloco 5 sala 101
88050-000 Santo Antônio de Lisboa, Florianópolis SC +55 48 3239-2400
wplex.com.br
[image: WPLEX
veral
threads (GmplSwing). Why is it necessary in this case and not in the other
examples?
*Sylvain Fournier*
Analista de Pesquisa Operacional
*48 3239-2423*
WPLEX Software Ltda.
Rod SC 401 no. 8600 Corporate Park bloco 5 sala 101
88050-000 Santo Antônio de Lisboa, Florianópolis SC +55 48 3239
could you tell me since which
version?
Thanks!
*Sylvain Fournier*
Analista de Pesquisa Operacional
*48 3239-2423*
WPLEX Software Ltda.
Rod SC 401 no. 8600 Corporate Park bloco 5 sala 101
88050-000 Santo Antônio de Lisboa, Florianópolis SC +55 48 3239-2400
wplex.com.br
[image: WPLEX]
2014-03-10
Hello Heinrich,
Thanks, I'll have a look at this paper.
And what about the constant GLPKConstants.GLP_JAVA_A_RC ?
Regards,
--
*Sylvain Fournier*
Analista de Pesquisa Operacional
*48 3239-2423*
WPLEX Software Ltda.
Rod SC 401 no. 8600 Corporate Park bloco 5 sala 101
88050-000 Santo Antôn
Thanks Heinrich, I'll wait for the Swig fix.
--
*Sylvain Fournier*
Analista de Pesquisa Operacional
*48 3239-2423*
WPLEX Software Ltda.
Rod SC 401 no. 8600 Corporate Park bloco 5 sala 101
88050-000 Santo Antônio de Lisboa, Florianópolis SC +55 48 3239-2400
wplex.com.br
[image: WPLEX]
2
Ok, but then how do I get a glp_arc from a SWIGTYPE_p_glp_arc and
vice-versa? (same question for glp_graph) Is there some routine like
doubleArray_getitem() or intArray_getitem()? In the MinimumCostFlow.java
example, there is no glp_graph or glp_arc object.
Thanks,
--
*Sylvain Fournier*
Analista
this feature in
version 4.47.
I look forward to testing the new minimum cost flow algorithm!
Cheers,
--
*Sylvain Fournier*
Analista de Pesquisa Operacional
*48 3239-2423*
WPLEX Software Ltda.
Rod SC 401 no. 8600 Corporate Park bloco 5 sala 101
88050-000 Santo Antônio de Lisboa, Florianópolis SC +55 48
pron
>
> NEU: FreePhone 3-fach-Flat mit kostenlosem Smartphone!
> Jetzt informieren: http://mobile.1und1.de/?ac=OM.PW.PW003K20328T7073a
>
--
*Sylvain Fournier*
Analista de Pesquisa Operacional
*48 3239-2423*
WPLEX Software Ltda.
Rod SC 401 no. 8600 Corporate Park bloco 5 sal
gt; wrapper, which probably is needed for Java.
>
> --
> Nigel Galloway
> nigel_gallo...@operamail.com
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012, at 06:18 PM, Andrew Makhorin wrote:
> > Forwarded Message
> > From: Sylvain Fournier
> > To: Andrew Makhorin
iling list archives, or in the files
included in the GLPK distribution (examples and documentation). Did I miss
something?
Cheers,
--
*Sylvain Fournier*
Analista de Pesquisa Operacional
*48 3239-2423*
WPLEX Software Ltda.
Rod SC 401 no. 8600 Corporate Park bloco 5 sala 101
88050-000 Santo Antônio
point: when I solve
the LP again, the first solution (at iteration 0) has a lower objective (all
right) but the value of the infeasibility increases. How is it possible that
the infeasibility increases although I removed a constraint?
I am (still) using the GLPK version 4.38.
Best regards,
Sy
do I
have to initialize the environment thread pointer?
Sylvain Fournier
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 14:06:15 +0400
> From: Andrew Makhorin
> Subject: Re: [Help-glpk] Thread safety of GLPK
> To: "Hammond, Paul"
> Cc: help-glpk@gnu.org
> Message-ID: <474395093.2010041514
Thanks Xypron and Andrew for solving my problem! This new error routine will
be a good reason for me to upgrade my GLPK version. :-)
Sylvain
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 07:55:22 +0300
> From: Andrew Makhorin
> Subject: Re: [Help-glpk] Application crash due to assert in GLPK
> To: xypron
> Cc: Help-g
lication in order to treat it appropriately?
Thanks,
Sylvain Fournier
___
Help-glpk mailing list
Help-glpk@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-glpk
direction, only for the GLPK routines? I see that there is a routine
glp_term_hook, but I'd like to see an example (in Java) of how to use it in
the case of the Java interface developed by Xypron (
http://winglpk.sourceforge.net/).
2009/9/14 Michael Hennebry
> On Mon, 14 Sep 2009,
Extending the subject, is it possible with GLPK to redirect this output to a
file instead of stdout?
> Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:47:20 +0400
> From: "Hart, William E"
> Subject: RE: [Help-glpk] Feature request - option to flush output
> To: help-glpk@gnu.org
> Message-ID: <467045031.20090914194.
For the time being, my branch-and-bound algorithm is not optimal. Anyway, I
won't need an optimal solution (it may be difficult to reach it due to the
size of the problems I am facing).
So even if my branch-and-bound algorithm was correct, as I have to stop the
run before the optimal solution, I ma
Thanks for the link, from now on I won't expect the same behavior for
Windows and Linux when solving a linear model.
But what about the difference in the number of digits?
2009/6/23 Andrew Makhorin
> > I am getting back to this subject because I am facing a small
> > problem using GLPK both on W
lvain
2009/6/1 Sylvain Fournier
> I just tested it (only the target "all" of the Makefile), and it seems to
> work well. Many thanks Xypron!
> I have to point out that I had to make small changes in the Makefile to
> make it work:
> In the first call to libtool (gcc ... s
PDT)
> From: xypron
> Subject: [Help-glpk] Compiling GLPK for Java under Linux
> To: Help-glpk@gnu.org
> Message-ID: <23804217.p...@talk.nabble.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>
> Hello Sylvain
>
> Sylvain Fournier wrote:
> >
&g
I already thought of this way of getting rid of a variable. But keeping all
the variables in the model, even bounded to 0, won´t slow down the simplex
method? (there may be quite a lot of "removed" variables)
2009/5/27 Andrew Makhorin
> Rather than to "physically" remove a basic column from the
ID: <23686380.p...@talk.nabble.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>
> Hello Sylvain,
>
> Sylvain Fournier wrote:
> >
> > I then saw that there is a glpk_4_38_java library available (
> > http://winglpk.sourceforge.net/), I tried it on
2009/5/23 Andrew Makhorin
>
>
> Lpx_warm_up will be replaced by glp_warm_up, which will provide the
> same functionality.
>
>
Thanks for the quick and detailed answer. I will keep using the warm up
functionality, because I don´t really have an idea of which variable(s)
should enter the basis.
Syl
If you want more information, feel free to ask!
Sylvain Fournier
> Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 16:32:01 +0300
> From: Andrew Makhorin
> Subject: [Help-glpk] glpk 4.38 release information
> To: help-glpk@gnu.org
> Message-ID: <1566961953.20090502163...@gnu.org>
> Content-
The problem is that I am using GLPK on Linux, and I need a .so file rather
than .dll.
Sylvain
>
> Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2009 17:07:07 +0200
> From: Denis Debarbieux
> Subject: RE : [Help-glpk] Obtain the variables values in a GLPK 4.8
>JavaInterface
> To: help-glpk@gnu.org
> Message-ID:
Hello,
I am currently using GLPK with the Java interface developped and made
available in the following website: http://bjoern.dapnet.de/glpk/
When I solve a LP and I want to retrieve the values of the solution (using
getColPrim() and getColDual(), for example), these values (they are of type
doub
35 matches
Mail list logo