Re: Integrate guix-installed Emacs packages with locally compiled Emacs pretest

2018-03-14 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Pierre Neidhardt skribis: > Is there such a thing as a curated list of unofficial, user-contributed > packages for GuixSD? (Anything that cannot be accepted in the official > repository, such as development versions.) No, there’s no such thing. However, I would hope that

Re: Integrate guix-installed Emacs packages with locally compiled Emacs pretest

2018-03-13 Thread Jorge
March 13, 2018 3:47 AM, "Konrad Hinsen" wrote: > With Emacs, everything is possible :-) > > You'd have to do two things in your Emacs configuration: > - add the notmuch elisp directory from Guix to load-path > - make sure that your Guix profile is on exec-path > >

Re: Integrate guix-installed Emacs packages with locally compiled Emacs pretest

2018-03-13 Thread Pierre Neidhardt
Is there such a thing as a curated list of unofficial, user-contributed packages for GuixSD? (Anything that cannot be accepted in the official repository, such as development versions.) -- Pierre Neidhardt signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Integrate guix-installed Emacs packages with locally compiled Emacs pretest

2018-03-13 Thread Konrad Hinsen
On 13/03/2018 00:49, Jorge wrote: Hi. I want to use Guix to install notmuch (with the Emacs interface) and emacs-guix; however, since Guix does not have Emacs 26, I would like to keep using my locally-compiled Emacs 26.0.91. Is that possible? Would it be quicker to learn Guix packaging and

Integrate guix-installed Emacs packages with locally compiled Emacs pretest

2018-03-12 Thread Jorge
Hi. I want to use Guix to install notmuch (with the Emacs interface) and emacs-guix; however, since Guix does not have Emacs 26, I would like to keep using my locally-compiled Emacs 26.0.91. Is that possible? Would it be quicker to learn Guix packaging and package Emacs 26.0.91 for Guix? - I

Re: guix installed Emacs

2016-04-18 Thread Catonano
2016-04-18 21:29 GMT+02:00 Alex Kost : > Ouch, I think this could happen just because Fedora doesn't set a > default value of xdg variables. So when some program sees that > XDG_DATA_DIRS is set, it doesn't use /usr/share anymore. So the problem > you faced will probably be

Re: guix installed Emacs

2016-04-18 Thread Alex Kost
Catonano (2016-04-18 15:39 +0300) wrote: > I have some news about this > > Suddenly I couldn't log in anymore as catonano. The login window > didn't let the desktopo come up, rather it popped up again and again > > I logged in as root and saw some gvfs and gsettings segfaults in the > dmesg

Re: guix installed Emacs

2016-04-17 Thread Catonano
2016-04-17 17:45 GMT+02:00 Alex Kost : > > export XDG_DATA_DIRS="$HOME/.guix-profile/share:$XDG_DATA_DIRS" > > Do icons appear after this? > Yes, they do ;-) Thanks to the both of you, Alex and Jean Louis !

Re: guix installed Emacs

2016-04-17 Thread Catonano
2016-04-17 10:25 GMT+02:00 Alex Kost : > Jean Louis (2016-04-16 15:59 +0300) wrote: > > > > I guess that is due to wrong environment when running emacs. > > > > Check the $XDG_DATA_DIRS to conform to Guix recommended. > > This may be the case, indeed! > > Catonano, you can set

Re: guix installed Emacs

2016-04-17 Thread Catonano
2016-04-17 10:23 GMT+02:00 Alex Kost : > > [...] > > Yes, the Fedora Emacs has this site-start > > > > ;;; loaded before user's ".emacs" file and default.el > > > > ;; load *.el and *.elc in /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/site-start.d on > > startup > > (mapc > > 'load > >

Re: guix installed Emacs

2016-04-17 Thread Alex Kost
Jean Louis (2016-04-16 15:59 +0300) wrote: > On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 02:52:10PM +0300, Alex Kost wrote: >> Another thing: I noticed that Guix's Emacs doesn't display some buttons >> on the tool bar. This should probably (I'm not sure) be fixed by >> installing some icon theme in your profile,

Re: guix installed Emacs

2016-04-17 Thread Alex Kost
Catonano (2016-04-16 20:59 +0300) wrote: > Alex, > > thank you so much for your help No problem :) [...] > Yes, the Fedora Emacs has this site-start > > ;;; loaded before user's ".emacs" file and default.el > > ;; load *.el and *.elc in /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/site-start.d on > startup >

Re: guix installed Emacs

2016-04-16 Thread Catonano
Ludovic 2016-04-16 14:24 GMT+02:00 Ludovic Courtès : > Alex Kost skribis: > > > As Jean pointed most likely the problem with fonts happens because Emacs > > from Guix doesn't use fonts from your Fedora font dirs. Installing > > required fonts in your user

Re: guix installed Emacs

2016-04-16 Thread Jean Louis
On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 02:52:10PM +0300, Alex Kost wrote: > Another thing: I noticed that Guix's Emacs doesn't display some buttons > on the tool bar. This should probably (I'm not sure) be fixed by > installing some icon theme in your profile, for example > 'adwaita-icon-theme'. > > -- > Alex

Re: guix installed Emacs

2016-04-16 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Alex Kost skribis: > As Jean pointed most likely the problem with fonts happens because Emacs > from Guix doesn't use fonts from your Fedora font dirs. Installing > required fonts in your user profile will probably fix this issue. You > can do it like this: > > guix

Re: guix installed Emacs

2016-04-16 Thread Alex Kost
Catonano (2016-04-16 14:17 +0300) wrote: > 2016-04-16 11:10 GMT+02:00 Alex Kost : > > As Jean pointed most likely the problem with fonts happens > because Emacs > from Guix doesn't use fonts from your Fedora font dirs.  > Installing > required fonts in your

Re: guix installed Emacs

2016-04-16 Thread Alex Kost
Catonano (2016-04-16 01:48 +0300) wrote: > I installed Emacs with guix. > > But the experience provided by the guix provided Emacs is not on par > with the one provided by the Fedora host rpovided Emacs > > The menus and the buttons are slightly different but most important > is the minibuffer:

guix installed Emacs

2016-04-15 Thread Catonano
I installed Emacs with guix. But the experience provided by the guix provided Emacs is not on par with the one provided by the Fedora host rpovided Emacs The menus and the buttons are slightly different but most important is the minibuffer: It's a bit too small and hard to read. Also the color