On Nov 27, 2004, at 8:38 PM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
I'll write back when i get my time to run test tests.
I've a full Oracle8/9/10 test setup here, send stuff.
--
Christian Bauer
+49 171 455 66 53
callto://christian-bauer
Hibernate
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hibernate.org
JBoss Inc
[EMAIL PROTECT
> I still need to test this against 8i/9i, which is where people have
been
> seeing this issue. I looked into the classes in the newer 10g jar
and
> they seem to be handling this the correct way (in terms of caching
the
> name-to-index resolution). I just do not currently have an install
of
> eit
ember 26, 2004 7:35 PM
To: Max Andersen; Hibernate development
Subject: RE: [Hibernate] WRAP_RESULT_SETS
I use oracle 10g for my testing and it is actually almost twice as
slow
against those drivers. The first version I wrote used arrays as
opposed
to lists, but I found the performance hit of usi
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 19:35:10 -0600, Steve Ebersole
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I still need to test this against 8i/9i, which is where people have been
seeing this issue. I looked into the classes in the newer 10g jar and
they seem to be handling this the correct way (in terms of caching the
nam
aking.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:hibernate-devel-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Ebersole
> Sent: Friday, November 26, 2004 7:35 PM
> To: Max Andersen; Hibernate development
> Subject: RE: [Hibernate] WRAP_RESULT_SETS
>
> I use
I use oracle 10g for my testing and it is actually almost twice as slow
against those drivers. The first version I wrote used arrays as opposed
to lists, but I found the performance hit of using Lists minimal enough
to warrant the easier programming model.
I still need to test this against 8i/9i,
