To: "'Henri Tremblay'"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,"'hibernate-devel'"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [Hibernate] Lazy components
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 05:27:37 -0500
> -Original Message-
> From: Henri Tremblay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
7;Henri Tremblay'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,"'hibernate-devel'"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [Hibernate] Lazy components
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 05:27:37 -0500
> -Original Message-
> From: Henri Tremblay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday,
> -Original Message-
> From: Henri Tremblay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 5:26 PM
> To: Joshua Davis; 'Gavin King'; 'hibernate-devel'
> Subject: Re: [Hibernate] Lazy components
[snip]
> That said, the benefit of having
> Is this what the patch is doing?
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Emmanuel Bernard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "'hibernate-devel'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 12:39 AM
> Subject: Re: [Hibernate]
uot;Emmanuel Bernard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'hibernate-devel'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 12:39 AM
Subject: Re: [Hibernate] Lazy components
> Henri Tremblay wrote:
>
> >P.S.: Just to be annoying, according to the way I'
Henri Tremblay wrote:
P.S.: Just to be annoying, according to the way I'm using components, I'll
find really useful to have HB-31 fixed instead of lazy components
implemented :-) (yeah, I know, it might not be really funny to fix it, even
with the available patch...)
Hum, I thought this one was
IMHO,
I've been doing a lot of mapping these days on a lot of classes and tables
from different teams on my project.
I've seen a lot of different mapping issues.
And I agree, I don't think you need to mess the code to put lazy components.
The only time I've been using components is in the case whe
Yeah, I'm inclined to not commit this stuff. I might add it as a patch.
But I'm not really very happy with how it turned out.
Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
Gavin King wrote:
I have an experimental (working) implementation of lazy components
in my sandbox. To be honest, I don't really like it very much.
Gavin King wrote:
I have an experimental (working) implementation of lazy components
in my sandbox. To be honest, I don't really like it very much. I can't
really support collections in lazy components without adding waaay
too much complexity, so I would have to put what seem like arbitrary
restri
Lazy components seem redundant to me. A similar effect can be achieved by
using a one to one association (many to one, where many is one).
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Gavin King
> Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2004 8:03 PM
> T
10 matches
Mail list logo
