Another little thing, Microsoft (last I read) was dropping support for
Visual Studio 2003 on Vista, choosing only to support VS2k5 and VB 6.0.
I'm not sure if this has changed since then but here's a reference:
http://blogs.msdn.com/somasegar/archive/2006/09/26/772250.aspx
So it's good to be
The Compilers
For a starter the code runs closer to the ISO
It also uses alot more secure code - more or less to
stop Data Overflow Exploits.
You also have SSE3, and AMD64 support (NO IA64)
I have found the interface is a little bit better then
2003
Adam
--- Jed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Forget the compiler, the debugger is leaps and bounds above VS2003.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam amckern
Mckern
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 5:42 PM
To: hlcoders@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: Re: [hlcoders] VS2003 vs VS2005
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam
amckern Mckern
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 3:42 PM
To: hlcoders@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: Re: [hlcoders] VS2003 vs VS2005
The Compilers
For a starter the code runs closer to the ISO It also uses alot more
secure code - more or less to stop Data Overflow Exploits
4 matches
Mail list logo
