Re: [homenet] [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal

2011-08-08 Thread james woodyatt
On Aug 7, 2011, at 5:15 PM, Mark Andrews wrote: One think I haven't seen mentions w.r.t. firewalls is protecting the rest of the world from compromised home machines. While ISP's should be doing BCP 38 filtering, CPE devices should also be filtering outgoing traffic that is not from a

Re: [homenet] [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal

2011-08-07 Thread Sander Steffann
In the context of the HOMENET working group, one imagines that restoring general end-to-end reachability is arguably a worthy goal. +1 +1 Sander ___ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet

Re: [homenet] [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal

2011-08-07 Thread Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
] On Behalf Of Roger Jørgensen Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2011 2:58 PM To: james woodyatt Cc: homenet@ietf.org; Fernando Gont Subject: Re: [homenet] [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 3:18 AM, james woodyatt j...@apple.com wrote: snip In the context of the HOMENET

Re: [homenet] [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal

2011-08-07 Thread David R Oran
@ietf.org; Fernando Gont Subject: Re: [homenet] [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 3:18 AM, james woodyatt j...@apple.com wrote: snip In the context of the HOMENET working group, one imagines that restoring general end-to-end reachability is arguably a worthy goal

Re: [homenet] [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal

2011-08-07 Thread Russ White
In one hand, we want the capability to reach anywhere we're allowed to from home. OTOH, if anything in my home is reachable from anywhere, we are back to the firewall paradigm. Why? You are still back to all the security disadvantages of firewalls - soft chewy inside, etc. Reachability