, 10 de noviembre de 2018 19:30
Para: HttpClient User Discussion
Asunto: Re: RV: Migration from Async 4.1.3 to HttpClient 5
On Sat, 2018-11-10 at 18:02 +0100, Joan Balagueró - ventusproxy wrote:
> Hello Oleg,
>
> Sorry, but I think I'm going to need a bit more help to finish
>
onnections to reuse, shouldn't
> the max_conn value have preference?
>
> 2. Is TEST 5 ok? It seems the 'DefaultMaxPerRoute' cannot be applied
> on the fly in a lax pool. It should have a value of 5000 but it's
> preserving the previous value of 1 (test 4).
>
>
>
> Thanks ,
>
>
Thanks ,
Joan.
-Mensaje original-
De: Oleg Kalnichevski [mailto:ol...@apache.org]
Enviado el: viernes, 9 de noviembre de 2018 15:31
Para: HttpClient User Discussion
Asunto: Re: RV: Migration from Async 4.1.3 to HttpClient 5
On Fri, 2018-11-09 at 15:19 +0100, Joan Balagueró wrote:
>
the lax pool, only max per route.
>
Hi,
Can you make sure this is Javadoc'd in the right places if it is not
already?
Gary
>
> Oleg
>
>
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Joan.
> >
> >
> > -----Mensaje original-----
> > De: Oleg Kalnichevski [mailto:ol...@apache.o
t;
>
> Max total is not enforced by the lax pool, only max per route.
>
> Oleg
>
>
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Joan.
> >
> >
> > -Mensaje original-
> > De: Oleg Kalnichevski [mailto:ol...@apache.org] Enviado el: jueves,
> > 8
> >
.
-Mensaje original-
De: Oleg Kalnichevski [mailto:ol...@apache.org]
Enviado el: viernes, 9 de noviembre de 2018 15:01
Para: HttpClient User Discussion
Asunto: Re: RV: Migration from Async 4.1.3 to HttpClient 5
On Fri, 2018-11-09 at 13:39 +0100, Joan Balagueró wrote:
> Thanks Oleg. One m
l: jueves, 8 de noviembre de 2018 11:04
> Para: HttpClient User Discussion
> Asunto: Re: RV: Migration from Async 4.1.3 to HttpClient 5
>
> On Wed, 2018-11-07 at 19:30 +0100, Joan Balagueró wrote:
> > Hello Oleg,
> >
> > We are finishing the migration and hav
[mailto:ol...@apache.org]
Enviado el: jueves, 8 de noviembre de 2018 11:04
Para: HttpClient User Discussion
Asunto: Re: RV: Migration from Async 4.1.3 to HttpClient 5
On Wed, 2018-11-07 at 19:30 +0100, Joan Balagueró wrote:
> Hello Oleg,
>
> We are finishing the migration and have the last
On Wed, 2018-11-07 at 19:30 +0100, Joan Balagueró wrote:
> Hello Oleg,
>
> We are finishing the migration and have the last questions:
>
> 1. If a connection is kept-alive for 30s at second 0, and after 10s
> is reused, this connection will die at second 30 or will survive
> until second 40?
Hello Oleg,
We are finishing the migration and have the last questions:
1. If a connection is kept-alive for 30s at second 0, and after 10s is reused,
this connection will die at second 30 or will survive until second 40?
2. Regarding the RetryHandler, below the method inherited from http 4.5
10 matches
Mail list logo