RE: RV: Migration from Async 4.1.3 to HttpClient 5

2018-11-11 Thread Joan Balagueró
, 10 de noviembre de 2018 19:30 Para: HttpClient User Discussion Asunto: Re: RV: Migration from Async 4.1.3 to HttpClient 5 On Sat, 2018-11-10 at 18:02 +0100, Joan Balagueró - ventusproxy wrote: > Hello Oleg, > > Sorry, but I think I'm going to need a bit more help to finish >

Re: RV: Migration from Async 4.1.3 to HttpClient 5

2018-11-10 Thread Oleg Kalnichevski
onnections to reuse, shouldn't > the max_conn value have preference? > > 2. Is TEST 5 ok? It seems the 'DefaultMaxPerRoute' cannot be applied > on the fly in a lax pool. It should have a value of 5000 but it's > preserving the previous value of 1 (test 4). > > > > Thanks , > >

RV: Migration from Async 4.1.3 to HttpClient 5

2018-11-10 Thread Joan Balagueró - ventusproxy
Thanks , Joan. -Mensaje original- De: Oleg Kalnichevski [mailto:ol...@apache.org] Enviado el: viernes, 9 de noviembre de 2018 15:31 Para: HttpClient User Discussion Asunto: Re: RV: Migration from Async 4.1.3 to HttpClient 5 On Fri, 2018-11-09 at 15:19 +0100, Joan Balagueró wrote: >

Re: RV: Migration from Async 4.1.3 to HttpClient 5

2018-11-09 Thread Gary Gregory
the lax pool, only max per route. > Hi, Can you make sure this is Javadoc'd in the right places if it is not already? Gary > > Oleg > > > > Thanks, > > > > Joan. > > > > > > -----Mensaje original----- > > De: Oleg Kalnichevski [mailto:ol...@apache.o

Re: RV: Migration from Async 4.1.3 to HttpClient 5

2018-11-09 Thread Oleg Kalnichevski
t; > > Max total is not enforced by the lax pool, only max per route. > > Oleg > > > > Thanks, > > > > Joan. > > > > > > -Mensaje original- > > De: Oleg Kalnichevski [mailto:ol...@apache.org] Enviado el: jueves, > > 8 > >

RE: RV: Migration from Async 4.1.3 to HttpClient 5

2018-11-09 Thread Joan Balagueró
. -Mensaje original- De: Oleg Kalnichevski [mailto:ol...@apache.org] Enviado el: viernes, 9 de noviembre de 2018 15:01 Para: HttpClient User Discussion Asunto: Re: RV: Migration from Async 4.1.3 to HttpClient 5 On Fri, 2018-11-09 at 13:39 +0100, Joan Balagueró wrote: > Thanks Oleg. One m

Re: RV: Migration from Async 4.1.3 to HttpClient 5

2018-11-09 Thread Oleg Kalnichevski
l: jueves, 8 de noviembre de 2018 11:04 > Para: HttpClient User Discussion > Asunto: Re: RV: Migration from Async 4.1.3 to HttpClient 5 > > On Wed, 2018-11-07 at 19:30 +0100, Joan Balagueró wrote: > > Hello Oleg, > > > > We are finishing the migration and hav

RE: RV: Migration from Async 4.1.3 to HttpClient 5

2018-11-09 Thread Joan Balagueró
[mailto:ol...@apache.org] Enviado el: jueves, 8 de noviembre de 2018 11:04 Para: HttpClient User Discussion Asunto: Re: RV: Migration from Async 4.1.3 to HttpClient 5 On Wed, 2018-11-07 at 19:30 +0100, Joan Balagueró wrote: > Hello Oleg, > > We are finishing the migration and have the last

Re: RV: Migration from Async 4.1.3 to HttpClient 5

2018-11-08 Thread Oleg Kalnichevski
On Wed, 2018-11-07 at 19:30 +0100, Joan Balagueró wrote: > Hello Oleg, > > We are finishing the migration and have the last questions: > > 1. If a connection is kept-alive for 30s at second 0, and after 10s > is reused, this connection will die at second 30 or will survive > until second 40?

RV: Migration from Async 4.1.3 to HttpClient 5

2018-11-07 Thread Joan Balagueró
Hello Oleg, We are finishing the migration and have the last questions: 1. If a connection is kept-alive for 30s at second 0, and after 10s is reused, this connection will die at second 30 or will survive until second 40? 2. Regarding the RetryHandler, below the method inherited from http 4.5