Hullo Dale,
On Aug 16, 1:53 pm, Dale Beams drbe...@hotmail.com wrote:
[snip]
As you can tell, after the optimization, things went haywire.
[snip]
Test images pto file are located here
http://www.tatteredmoons.org/hugin/test/test.html
I tried your test images in my Fedora build of
Dale Beams drbe...@hotmail.com wrote:
[...]
good match == green bar
http://www.tatteredmoons.org/hugin/screenshots/Screenshot-3.png
alignment shows 2.3 good fit
http://www.tatteredmoons.org/hugin/screenshots/Screenshot-4.png
result
Hi all,
Haven't tried to build a windows version for a number of months but have
just done so. Ran the problem using celeste and 'the remove outlying points
options' and got a result as good as AutopanoPro
Cheers
--
View this message in context:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 00:55, Eric O'Brien eri...@extramonday.com wrote:
The fact that Autopano Pro succeeded begs the question of why Hugin did not.
raises the question
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software
Hello everyone,
This post makes me ask a question that's been bugging me for quite
some time. I used to use autopano SIFT C for generating control points
earlier by feeding it all the images at one time. But some time later
i started sending two images at a time to the keypoint matcher with
almost
Hi Dale,
others have given you pieces of advice, most of it useful and generally valid.
I think however that you may have found a bug. I can consistently reproduce
it here on my end on Kubuntu 10.4 using the trunk version of Hugin with many
projects that would otherwise stitch well.
On
On August 15, 2010 11:53:26 pm Dale Beams wrote:
As you can tell, after the optimization, things went haywire.
On the Assistant tab, there are two fields: Focal Length and Focal Length
Multiplier. Check their values. Here they return incorrect values after
loading my images. I don't
Hullo All,
Just a little more to add to this story.
Using APSC with type set to All images at once results in common
control points being found in images 1 and 6, which clearly gets
things out of kilter.
If APSC is used with type set to Multirow, the project stitches
flawlessly using the
On Sun, 2010-08-15 at 14:00 -0700, Alan wrote:
Nick, thanks for the response...
Yes, under the Images tab, each image shows a different shutter speed.
And under the Exposure tab, each image has a different EV value.I've
selected Fused and blended panorama (only) in the stitcher.
I'm now
Hullo again,
Sorry to be posting in bits and pieces.
A bit more experimentation that might be helpful (or add to the
confusion) on this issue.
I have now tried this project using Pablo's free panomatic control
point detector, and it works very nicely.
I have the type set to all images at once, and
I've just shifted to Win7Pro x64 and would love to test my 64 bit wings. Does
anyone have a mostly-working build? :)
Thanks,
pete
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked
On August 16, 2010 12:27:27 pm Dale Beams wrote:
I was under the impression that celeste was for cloud based areas.
Indeed it is.
Could celeste be used elsewhere?
It would need to be trained against these other visual features you want to
identify. The code is in the repository but so far
On August 16, 2010 01:13:52 pm Dale Beams wrote:
On August 15, 2010 11:53:26 pm Dale Beams wrote:
As you can tell, after the optimization, things went haywire.
On the Assistant tab, there are two fields: Focal Length and Focal Length
Multiplier. Check their values. Here they return
Hullo Dale,
On Aug 17, 12:53 pm, Dale Beams drbe...@hotmail.com wrote:
Terry,
did --grad actually work? The last version I built, when running
pablomatic --help, i did not see that as an option, moreover, it spewed
error messages with that option. I was unable to tell what it did.
I just
Terry,
I think you'll find the build returns that. Or at least it did for me.
Moreover, the resulting binary is panomatic as well. I'm not sure things
have been migrated, as it's not been tested well. I just completed the pano
here after reading some of Yuv's comments. I had make a
Hullo Dale,
On Aug 17, 3:09 pm, Dale Beams drbe...@hotmail.com wrote:
Terry,
I think you'll find the build returns that. Or at least it did for me.
Moreover, the resulting binary is panomatic as well. I'm not sure things
have been migrated, as it's not been tested well. I just
16 matches
Mail list logo
