Robert Krawitz wrote:
An enfuse GUI (is luminance the right thing here?) would be very
helpful for this kind of thing, to visualize how the different
parameters affect the result.
An Enfuse Gui you say? If only we could come
up with a memorable or obvious name for such
a thing ;-)
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 09:18:23 +0100, paul womack wrote:
Robert Krawitz wrote:
An enfuse GUI (is luminance the right thing here?) would be very
helpful for this kind of thing, to visualize how the different
parameters affect the result.
An Enfuse Gui you say? If only we could come up with a
Try KImagefuser
http://wiki.panotools.org/Enfuse#Linux
On 26 October 2010 13:24, Robert Krawitz r...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 09:18:23 +0100, paul womack wrote:
Robert Krawitz wrote:
An enfuse GUI (is luminance the right thing here?) would be very
helpful for this kind of
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 14:09:00 +0200, Tim Nugent wrote:
Try KImagefuser
http://wiki.panotools.org/Enfuse#Linux
Yup, found it.
I can certainly change what's happening, but whatever I do I cannot
seem to get the sky dark. What's more, *any* combination of settings
(using levels=1) yields that
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 08:22:16 -0400, Robert Krawitz wrote:
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 14:09:00 +0200, Tim Nugent wrote:
Try KImagefuser
http://wiki.panotools.org/Enfuse#Linux
Yup, found it.
I can certainly change what's happening, but whatever I do I cannot
seem to get the sky dark. What's
Engu
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 09:18 +0100, paul womack wrote:
Robert Krawitz wrote:
An enfuse GUI (is luminance the right thing here?) would be very
helpful for this kind of thing, to visualize how the different
parameters affect the result.
An Enfuse Gui you say? If only we could come
Hi all
One thing that has been bugging (pun intended) me for a few years now is the
bug tracker. Hugin has grown and IMHO the SourceForge bug tracker is now
inadequate for Hugin's needs.
Our current stats:
- Bugs 1115 total - 218 open
- Feature Requests 240 total - 161 open
- Patches 145
Hi all!
I'm having trouble with a debug build build of the latest version
Pre-Release 2010.3.0.17d7a29f6f95
on Kubuntu 10.10
I didn't build the debug version deliberately - just copied the
instructions from the wiki without looking if they'd changed. Since
the wiki now includes the
Hugin !== Ubuntu or Kubuntu
Personally I like Mantis, have enjoyed using it, and it's very
successful for projects much larger than hugin.
Dale
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 14:31 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote:
Hi all
One thing that has been bugging (pun intended) me for a few years now is the
bug
On October 26, 2010 03:27:39 pm Dale Beams wrote:
Hugin !== Ubuntu or Kubuntu
read the proposal: for all platforms
Personally I like Mantis, have enjoyed using it, and it's very
successful for projects much larger than hugin.
The only choices open for voting at the moment are:
(a) stay with
On 26.10.2010 20:37, kfj wrote:
So I reverted to the Release version (using -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release
instead of the above, just a guess, really) and now it's back to how
it was before. I suppose it's an unwanted side-effect and not a
feature? Has anyone seen similar behaviour?
cmake
On October 26, 2010 02:37:16 pm kfj wrote:
So I reverted to the Release version (using -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release
instead of the above, just a guess, really) and now it's back to how
it was before. I suppose it's an unwanted side-effect and not a
feature?
yep, unwanted side effect. will have
Sounds like proprietary software path, where choices are limited by the
cathedral method and not open for voting.
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 16:02 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote:
On October 26, 2010 03:27:39 pm Dale Beams wrote:
Hugin !== Ubuntu or Kubuntu
read the proposal: for all platforms
On October 24, 2010 11:57:09 am Robert Krawitz wrote:
The point was that when I used align_image_stack to generate an image
directly I got an average error worse than the worst point error I got
by hand. It may well have been a single point off, but if I use
align_image_stack directly
On October 24, 2010 11:09:29 am kfj wrote:
I'm a bit shy to reveal any more than absolutely necessary to the
dataverse for the time being. I might change my mind. If you want we
can communicate off-list.
I tend to be paranoid about privacy-invasion from the net as well, but we're
all numbers
On October 26, 2010 05:05:38 pm Dale Beams wrote:
Sounds like proprietary software path, where choices are limited by the
cathedral method and not open for voting.
You need an hearing aid. This is the sound of Open Source, where choices are
limited by the available resources. If you are
Hi Yuv,
you are not really suggesting an alternative here but stating that you
would move if others don't follow your personal timetable - is this
really Open Source (thinking | behaviour)?
What's making your proposal so urgent? It looks to me as if you found a
solution for your personal
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:55:34 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote:
On October 24, 2010 11:57:09 am Robert Krawitz wrote:
The point was that when I used align_image_stack to generate an image
directly I got an average error worse than the worst point error I got
by hand. It may well have been a single
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:17:51 +0200, Carl von Einem wrote:
Robert Krawitz schrieb am 26.10.10 14:22:
I'm trying to fuse
* 0EV:
http://rlk.smugmug.com/Photography/enfuse-test/14365255_gYhFw#1064008497_nVtDY
* -2EV:
19 matches
Mail list logo
