Am 10.01.2012 12:19, schrieb Carlos Eduardo G. Carvalho (Cartola):
Canon 1D mark IV, Nikon D3x...?
And lenses? Sigma 18-250mm for standard pictures
It's always a good idea to put worst quality lenses on the most
expensive cameras ;-)
--
Erik Krause
http://www.erik-krause.de
--
You
Geoff, with properly calibrated sensors and a decent sensor fusion
algorithm, you should be able to get 0.1º accuracy, I think. But that's the
expensive stuff.
For cheap uncalibrated sensors without any sensor fusion, the results will
be bad - 5º or more.
On Monday, January 9, 2012 12:26:32
Surely :) but in fact I don't think sigma are that worse. Would this
picturehttp://cartola.org/panoramas/20110614-Clube_Naval_Salao_Nobre/get
much better with a canon lens? I also use an Opteka 6.5, but I am
really just an amateur trying to help.
Anyway, sorry for the incoherence. I began being
hello
witch plugin/script is it possible use for free, to show big images on
web?
i know only hdview...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
You mean big panoramas? For this there is the Salado Player / Salado
Converter, which can use its DeepZoomCubic format, allowing big zooms. In
fact I think the Salado Converter has a limit to deal with too much big
pictures, as it works in a way that it needs to put the whole
equirectangular into
Sooo ...
Specifically? I was looking to browse different types of camera via borrow
lenses (some of the more economical ones) and was looking for suggestions that
people were using.
I would be initially using the camera in a studio lighting workshop, and then
for model photos for portrait
Speaking of ... is there a group for experimental edge photography?
Dale
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 07:18:57 -0200
Subject: Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Looking for recomendations on a new camera
From: cartol...@gmail.com
To: hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
Surely :) but in fact I don't think sigma are that
Am 11.01.2012 10:18, schrieb Carlos Eduardo G. Carvalho (Cartola):
in fact I don't think sigma are that worse
Not Sigma as such (they have very good prime lenses) but a super-zoom
like the 18-250mm...
--
Erik Krause
http://www.erik-krause.de
--
You received this message because you are
thanks
but it is not very simple...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to
Yeah, it has some options and is config file driven, so you need to
understand the configurations... once you have a template it gets simple.
You can try to do the most simple template possible, but maybe it will not
achieve your needs. Anyway, if you think it would fit your needs I could
try to
Mark
Can you give some more details?
(1) Do you want 360 degree panoramas, or just very large flat
images... ?
(2) What size is 'big'? Pixel-size and File-size
I assume given you are on this newsgroup and your respond to Carlos it
is 360 panoramas you're interested in. On my website I use
Hi all,
I am looking for suggestions to build a cost-effective Linux cluster for
stitching, blending and tiling.
Data is 6 images of ca. 2.2 MB per pano. I have a real lot of them.
Lots of relatively cheap comodity hardware should deliver best bang for the
buck.
Suggestions for hardware design
If your software supports batch processing, use Sun Grid Engine
(available for Windows and Linux). For hardware, any P4 based set of
systems, as long as they are all similar in capability (CPU type, memory
available). Have one dual-homed system as your interface to the
cluster, and as many
13 matches
Mail list logo
