Re: [hugin-ptx] Problems with exposure compensation

In similar situations, I've had good results by having Hugin output 48-bit TIFF or another high-dynamic range format and using Luminance HDR to produce the final image. On 03/19/2014 04:49 PM, Dave H wrote: I just took the darkest image, brightened it in gimp and fixed the contrast a little.

Re: [hugin-ptx] Handling of overexposures

Hello Vladimir, On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 11:34:08 +1100, Vladimir Nadvornik wrote: Hi, the recent discussion about exposure compensation reminded me that I have related problem. I have a panorama from 10 images taken with fixed exposure, EV 12. A small part of the panorama is overexposed, s

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Multiblend option like --no-ciecam?

Hello Donald, On Sat, 22 Mar 2014 12:25:41 +1100, Donald Johnston wrote: I'm on OS X and the -h option works for both commands when I go into Terminal. I did "enblend -h | grep ciecam" and the information is there. Just a tough way to find info when the manual doesn't have it. I reck

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Multiblend option like --no-ciecam?

I'm on OS X and the -h option works for both commands when I go into Terminal. I did "enblend -h | grep ciecam" and the information is there. Just a tough way to find info when the manual doesn't have it. Or can you point out where in the manual I should be looking for no-ciecam. Thanks again.

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Multiblend option like --no-ciecam?

Hello Donald, On Sat, 22 Mar 2014 11:44:25 +1100, Donald Johnston wrote: Terry, that is always something I strongly advocate; RTFM. But you'll have to let me know which magic FM you're using. ;o) Just this one... When all else fails RTFM...use "multiblend -h" :-) The same for enble

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Multiblend option like --no-ciecam?

Terry, that is always something I strongly advocate; RTFM. But you'll have to let me know which magic FM you're using. ;o) I also believe however that most manuals are great as reference documents but not good from a learning point of view. I've done my best learning by following this group's

Re: [hugin-ptx] Handling of overexposures

On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 20:48:31 +1100, Vladimir Nadvornik wrote: On 03/21/2014 05:59 AM, Terry Duell wrote: [snip] Are you selecting an image with good exposure as your anchor for exposure? actually no. Does it have any effect on overexposure detection? I just ran a quick test here

Re: [hugin-ptx] Problems with exposure compensation

On Sat, 22 Mar 2014 09:35:44 +1100, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: On Saturday, 22 March 2014 at 9:10:02 +1100, Terry Duell wrote: [snip] Curious, I got quite good registration with your downsized images. Are you sure? That's my fault (hand-held), nothing to do with hugin, but you need t

Re: [hugin-ptx] Problems with exposure compensation

l point to it: >> http://www.lemis.com/grog/diary-mar2014.php#D-20140321-003415 (this >> time hopefully with the right number of w's). In summary: yes, this >> gives a more uniform lighting, but it "fused from any arrangement" >> requires very accurate registr

Re: [hugin-ptx] Problems with exposure compensation

On Friday, 21 March 2014 at 0:01:48 +0100, Jan Martin wrote: > How to do "exposure fused" by command-line only? > Without hugin? You'll need a Makefile, and the best way to get one is from hugin. That's what Terry attached. If you have a panorama called, say, foo, then saving the project will sa

Re: [hugin-ptx] Handling of overexposures

On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 20:48:31 +1100, Vladimir Nadvornik wrote: On 03/21/2014 05:59 AM, Terry Duell wrote: Are you selecting an image with good exposure as your anchor for exposure? actually no. Does it have any effect on overexposure detection. I recall that the anchor for exposure

Re: [hugin-ptx] Problems with exposure compensation

On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 16:30:02 +1100, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: Thanks. I've been in this in some detail, and rather than repeat what I've written in my diary, I'll point to it: http://www.lemis.com/grog/diary-mar2014.php#D-20140321-003415 (this time hopefully wit

[hugin-ptx] Re: Microscopy set of images and stitching them by using Hugin without image deformation

Ciao Mario On 20 Mar 2014, at 19:30, Mario Modesto wrote: As the title sais, I recently obtained several images from a simple sample with a microscope. And I would like to stitch them without deforming them. How can it be done using Hugin? Thanks Mario Even though hugin can sitich a set of

Re: [hugin-ptx] Can I automatically improve stitching?

Pawel Rozenek schrieb am 20.03.14 21:13: (...) Unfortunately panorama still has some errors. Your input images might contain parallax errors due to setup errors. Try to set up your gear correctly and check if you still have parallax errors in the overlap regions of your images. Carl -- A l

Re: [hugin-ptx] Hugin 2013 fails in nona on MacBook Pro Retina (late 2013)

Quoted from your log file: Hugin Version: 2013.0.0 built by Matthieu DESILE Did you try the upcoming 2014.0.0 beta? Using GPU for remapping In Hugin's preferences in 'Programs' tab there i

Re: [hugin-ptx] Microscopy set of images and stitching them by using Hugin without image deformation

Hi Mario, have you tried something yet? Hugin has many tutorials on its page: http://hugin.sourceforge.net/tutorials/index.shtml You might look on mosaic ones maybe, but if you have no experience with hugin you might take a look at others. If you don't want to make any distortion on any picture

Re: [hugin-ptx] Handling of overexposures

On 03/21/2014 05:59 AM, Terry Duell wrote: > Hello Vladimir, > > On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 11:34:08 +1100, Vladimir Nadvornik > wrote: > > [snip] > >> Now, when I process it as "Exposure fused from any arrangement", then >> there are no burned out areas, but the extra image is still recognizable