On Friday, February 11, 2022 at 3:24:32 PM UTC-5 dkloi wrote:
> If provide the raw files, maybe we could give it a shot. Are you able to
> show what you are getting?
Thanks for the offer. But this time I'd rather not share the photos (and
they were not raw, they were from my cell phone,
If provide the raw files, maybe we could give it a shot. Are you able to
show what you are getting?
In high contrast situations, I will use exposure blending with enfuse and
this gives quite natural looking results.
On Friday, 11 February 2022 at 14:32:22 UTC johnfi...@gmail.com wrote:
> I
In case someone chooses to test this (push several points of a mask close
to each other, then try to select one to move or delete, etc.), I should
point out that
I did not yet post the related correction to the code used when you CTRL
click on a line to create a new point. That is the same
if(d2 <= selectionLimit)
…
selectionLimit = d2;
first point: point within original selection limit -> accepted
second point: inside strict rect -> selectionLimit=0
third point: point within original selection limit -> rejected because
selection limit is now 0
--
A list of frequently asked
You have misunderstood the code. It does not do what you say.
On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 11:04 AM T. Modes wrote:
> johnfi...@gmail.com schrieb am Freitag, 11. Februar 2022 um 01:33:47
> UTC+1:
>
>>
>> I made that change, new version below. I only tested a tiny amount, but
>> including the case
johnfi...@gmail.com schrieb am Freitag, 11. Februar 2022 um 01:33:47 UTC+1:
>
> I made that change, new version below. I only tested a tiny amount, but
> including the case you mentioned that I hadn't tested before, which now
> works the way I assume most people would consider correct.
>
> In
I finally went back to that set of 3 photos and got a good result. I'm not
happy with the methods required. There is probably a better way. I'm open
to advice on what to try next time. There should be a better way, so in
any case I'll look through the relevant parts of the source code to
