Well, I'll look into that.
I actually did bring up the Optimizer Tab as before (since it solved the
last issue), but the only optimizations presented to me this time were
yaw/pitch/roll.
I'll try again tomorrow (?) and see where one can ADD parameters, and do
the 'translation y'.
I'll also
On Sunday, February 20, 2022 at 4:52:32 PM UTC-5 scott092707 wrote:
>
> New problem:
>
> I have a two-photo vertical panorama of a building (with a neat bunch of
> sculptures at the top), and despite indicating the entire sides of the
> buildings in each photo of the same lines - bottom to
New problem:
I have a two-photo vertical panorama of a building (with a neat bunch of
sculptures at the top), and despite indicating the entire sides of the
buildings in each photo of the same lines - bottom to top - the building
suddenly becomes wider on each side.
I have done further
On Sunday, February 20, 2022 at 10:55:26 AM UTC-5 T. Modes wrote:
>
> I asked you several times not to mix up several things in one commit. You
> still mixed up several unrelated code changes in one changeset. (Yes, they
> have both the same target. But the code changes are totally unrelated.
I forgot to say: The optimizer, only divides the sum of squares by the
square of the ratio of the actual AVERAGE FOV of the images to the initial
AVERAGE FOV of the images if this ratio is smaller than one, i.e. if the
actual
AVERAGE FOV is smaller than the initial AVERAGE FOV. Otherwise,
johnfi...@gmail.com schrieb am Samstag, 19. Februar 2022 um 18:57:37 UTC+1:
> I pushed the change discussed here to my branch.
>
> Hopefully someone else will try building and testing it.
>
I asked you several times not to mix up several things in one commit. You
still mixed up several
I have sometimes also the problem getting totally wrong results for yaw,
pitch and roll. Yes, limits can help from converging to a local minimum
with wrong parameters. E.g. you may know that the rotation of all images is
nearly zero or nearly 90 degrees. Then you can force the optimizer to
I have sometimes also the problem getting totally wrong results for yaw,
pitch and roll. Yes, limits can help from converging to a local minimum
with wrong parameters. E.g. you may know that the rotation of all images is
nearly zero or nearly 90 degrees. Then you can force the optimizer to
I have sometimes also the problem getting totally wrong results for yaw,
pitch and roll. Yes, limits can help from converging to a local minimum
with wrong parameters. E.g. you may know that the rotation of all images is
nearly zero or nearly 90 degrees. Then you can force the optimizer to keep
