Hi all,
Haven't tried to build a windows version for a number of months but have
just done so. Ran the problem using celeste and 'the remove outlying points
options' and got a result as good as AutopanoPro
Cheers
--
View this message in context:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 00:55, Eric O'Brien eri...@extramonday.com wrote:
The fact that Autopano Pro succeeded begs the question of why Hugin did not.
raises the question
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software
Hi Dale,
others have given you pieces of advice, most of it useful and generally valid.
I think however that you may have found a bug. I can consistently reproduce
it here on my end on Kubuntu 10.4 using the trunk version of Hugin with many
projects that would otherwise stitch well.
On
On August 15, 2010 11:53:26 pm Dale Beams wrote:
As you can tell, after the optimization, things went haywire.
On the Assistant tab, there are two fields: Focal Length and Focal Length
Multiplier. Check their values. Here they return incorrect values after
loading my images. I don't
On August 16, 2010 12:27:27 pm Dale Beams wrote:
I was under the impression that celeste was for cloud based areas.
Indeed it is.
Could celeste be used elsewhere?
It would need to be trained against these other visual features you want to
identify. The code is in the repository but so far
On August 16, 2010 01:13:52 pm Dale Beams wrote:
On August 15, 2010 11:53:26 pm Dale Beams wrote:
As you can tell, after the optimization, things went haywire.
On the Assistant tab, there are two fields: Focal Length and Focal Length
Multiplier. Check their values. Here they return
Hi.
Way back in the day (0.7.x), one could hand hold a camera, and take a
pano, hugin would stitch it togather, not perfectly, but well enough to
get a decent photo to view. An example of this would be:
http://www.tatteredmoons.org/pano/20080601-7/20071005-bur_oak_trail_rock.jpg
there are
My guess is that there are control points between images 1 and 5/6 and
or 2 and 5/6. The ceiling looks rather symmetrical from the shooting
viewpoint and Hugin or whatever piece of it is responsible for this
(the control point generator?) made inappropriate matches between
images that
