Allan,
Thanks.
I tried the JPEGs on my machine and just as you had found ...
Auto-pano-sift created 35 control points and Celeste removed the 32
of them that were on the clouds.
So then I created two 8-bit TIFF files and again Auto-pano-sift
created 35 control points and Celeste removed the 32
Does a change to the Celeste parameters in preferences result in better
performance for these images without removing desirable points? There are
also people in these images. Sometimes they are also like clouds. By the
way, from my perspective I am struck by the total absence of litter and
excess
Harry mentioned to me in an email that someone else was having a
problem with this Beta on a configuration like mine. So here is a
comment on my experience so far.
My configuration is:
a Powermac G5 - dual 1.8Ghz with 5.5Gb RAM running Mac OS X
10.4.11.
I have more RAM (which would give me
2009/10/6 grow george...@gmail.com:
Harry mentioned to me in an email that someone else was having a
problem with this Beta on a configuration like mine. So here is a
comment on my experience so far.
My configuration is:
a Powermac G5 - dual 1.8Ghz with 5.5Gb RAM running Mac OS X
This should probably have gone on a thread about Celetse ... but I am
working on that panorama I mentioned with the current Beta and have
found that I don't seem to to have the sort of clouds that Celeste
recognises.
Below is a link to a picture of a set of control points generated by
On Tue 06-Oct-2009 at 07:18 -0700, grow wrote:
This should probably have gone on a thread about Celetse ... but I am
working on that panorama I mentioned with the current Beta and have
found that I don't seem to to have the sort of clouds that Celeste
recognises.
This could be a problem with
Bruno,
Can you upload these two photos somewhere?
I am happy to do so ... at present they are 16-bit TIFF files and are
each 70+Mb ... do you think that their size/resolution/TIFF-ness might
would be significant? If so I can upload them onto one of my sites
and provide a link ... if not and
hi George,
try with high quality JPEG. if we can't reproduce the error, you can
always upload the heavier TIFFs in a second time.
thanks for your effort
Yuv
grow wrote:
Bruno,
Can you upload these two photos somewhere?
I am happy to do so ... at present they are 16-bit TIFF files and
OK,
Here they are:
http://hugin-ptx.googlegroups.com/web/5-of-9_IMG_0052.jpg?hl=en-GB
http://hugin-ptx.googlegroups.com/web/4-of-9_IMG_0049.jpg?hl=en-GB
As for the other error - the crashing Enblend running out of memory -
I re-ran the stitch at 10,000 x 5,000 and it worked OK
OSX hugin-mac-2009.4.0-Beta1 on this G4 removed all 64 control points
autopano-sift-c had matched on the clouds in your two jpg photos.
Allan
On Oct 6, 2009, at 9:00 PM, grow wrote:
OK,
Here they are:
http://hugin-ptx.googlegroups.com/web/5-of-9_IMG_0052.jpg?hl=en-GB
Thank you again for your seemingly tireless efforts to compile Hugin
OS X. I have been stitching scores of rough hand held images lately
and there have been a few very difficult scenes that would not come
together without considerable effort. I tested this new version on
the worst of
11 matches
Mail list logo
