Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin++ direct reading of ARW (raw) files

On 8/2/22 01:53, John Fine wrote: On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 8:36 PM 'dkloi' via hugin and other free panoramic software > wrote: A7m3 does uncompressed 14 bit raw files https://helpguide.sony.net/ilc/1720/v1/en/contents/TP0001661967.html

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin++ direct reading of ARW (raw) files

On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 8:36 PM 'dkloi' via hugin and other free panoramic software wrote: > A7m3 does uncompressed 14 bit raw files > https://helpguide.sony.net/ilc/1720/v1/en/contents/TP0001661967.html > https://www.sony.co.uk/electronics/support/articles/00229990. > Thanks! I remember long

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin++ direct reading of ARW (raw) files

A7m3 does uncompressed 14 bit raw files https://helpguide.sony.net/ilc/1720/v1/en/contents/TP0001661967.html https://www.sony.co.uk/electronics/support/articles/00229990. The A7m3 sensor has a 14 bit ADC (IMX410 https://www.sony-semicon.com/files/62/pdf/p-13_IMX410CQK_Flyer.pdf

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin++ direct reading of ARW (raw) files

On Monday, August 1, 2022 at 6:54:46 AM UTC-4 davi...@gmail.com wrote: > > > Where the camera has an advantage is that it knows precisely how the > sensor behaves, when and where it will create the most noise and what kind > of noise, maybe even detect different kinds of surfaces and apply

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin++ direct reading of ARW (raw) files

I used to use a noise reduction software to which you could "teach" what NR settings to apply automatically according to the camera brand, the ISO, the aperture and the speed. The results were good, but the NR was still applied globally to the whole image, and sometimes I had to create several

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin++ direct reading of ARW (raw) files

On July 31, 2022 9:27:10 AM HST, "johnfi...@gmail.com" wrote: > > > On Sunday, July 31, 2022 at 2:49:59 PM UTC-4 irthoma...@gmail.com wrote: > > > I see, thank you for the detailed reply. Does that mean that you are > > working with jpg files? I haven't dug into the code. Why not just use

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin++ direct reading of ARW (raw) files

On Sunday, July 31, 2022 at 2:49:59 PM UTC-4 irthoma...@gmail.com wrote: > I see, thank you for the detailed reply. Does that mean that you are > working with jpg files? I haven't dug into the code. Why not just use some > temporary folder for the tiffs, and erase them when finished? > > I

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin++ direct reading of ARW (raw) files

I see, thank you for the detailed reply. Does that mean that you are working with jpg files? I haven't dug into the code. Why not just use some temporary folder for the tiffs, and erase them when finished? On Sunday, July 31, 2022 at 7:24:12 PM UTC+1 johnfi...@gmail.com wrote: > First, a

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin++ direct reading of ARW (raw) files

First, a warning: After posting the above, my testing determined there is quite a bit of processing needed to massage a raw image into a useful 16 bit image. I don't know how to do that extra processing. I looked at other programs using the same code as libRaw and was unable to follow what they

[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin++ direct reading of ARW (raw) files

Hi, I want to try this but not sure how to build it? ➜ build cmake .. -- The C compiler identification is GNU 9.4.0 -- The CXX compiler identification is GNU 9.4.0 -- Check for working C compiler: /usr/bin/cc -- Check for working C compiler: /usr/bin/cc -- works -- Detecting C compiler ABI