[hugin-ptx] Re: PTmender + Hugin = no love?

2010-01-28 Thread Zoran Zorkic
On Jan 28, 8:07 pm, dmg d...@uvic.ca wrote: Sorry, i guess I just have to click one more time. So from what I see, PTmender is not outputing correctly the entire image? but what it outputs is accurate? Well, I just rendered another test, and yes the outputs are the same as Nona minus the

[hugin-ptx] Re: PTmender + Hugin = no love?

2010-01-28 Thread Zoran Zorkic
On Jan 28, 8:07 pm, dmg d...@uvic.ca wrote: But I want to fix the problems. So if we can find a good test case that shows the bug, I'll take care of it. I made a simple one. Here's the rar: http://lemur.dreamhosters.com/hugin/ptMenderTest.rar It contains my low pano and pto + ptstitcher

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: PTmender + Hugin = no love?

2010-01-28 Thread dmg
Thanks Zoran. PTmender is significantly faster than Nona. that is true. --dmg On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Zoran Zorkic zo...@gmx.net wrote: On Jan 28, 8:07 pm, dmg d...@uvic.ca wrote: But I want to fix the problems. So if we can find a good test case that shows the bug, I'll take care