Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Windows hugin-2010.2.0_rc1 Build

2010-10-17 Thread Yuval Levy
On October 17, 2010 07:09:54 am JeCh wrote: I tried Hugin 2010.3 Windows build from this thread: http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx/browse_thread/thread/7740afd5982d1 a6 Unfortunately the problem with non-ASCII characters is still there. Are the changes in the system for running

[hugin-ptx] Re: Windows hugin-2010.2.0_rc1 Build

2010-10-07 Thread Matthew Petroff
On Oct 6, 10:42 pm, Yuval Levy goo...@levy.ch wrote: thanks. do you care for repository write access? Sure; my SourceForge ID is mpetroff. I will then commit the icon and svg. I can also then add a Windows build to SourceForge once 2010.2.0 final is released. There are also a few fixes for the

[hugin-ptx] Re: Windows hugin-2010.2.0_rc1 Build

2010-10-06 Thread Henk Tijdink
Perhaps can Mathew Petrov copie the Autopano SIFT-C 2.5.1 to the download site of his Hugin builds and the Panz adapt the installer script for downloading then the right Autopano SIFT-C. Kind regards, Henk . On 5 okt, 22:48, Bart van Andel bavanan...@gmail.com wrote: On 5 okt, 15:34,

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Windows hugin-2010.2.0_rc1 Build

2010-10-06 Thread Yuval Levy
On October 6, 2010 03:50:19 am Henk Tijdink wrote: Perhaps can Mathew Petrov copie the Autopano SIFT-C 2.5.1 to the download site of his Hugin builds and the Panz adapt the installer script for downloading then the right Autopano SIFT-C. just pay attention where you copy Autopano-SIFT-C to

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Windows hugin-2010.2.0_rc1 Build

2010-10-06 Thread Yuval Levy
On October 5, 2010 08:46:25 pm Matthew Petroff wrote: I made a better icon for .pto files. Currently the icon is in a separate archive in the installer, extracting into share. The changes are available here: http://www.mpetroff.net/hugin/installerchanges_2010-10-05.7z In case it could be

[hugin-ptx] Re: Windows hugin-2010.2.0_rc1 Build

2010-10-05 Thread Henk Tijdink
The solution for autopano SIFT-C is removing the parameters -- projection %f%v in the parameter line in the preference tab. Then even Autopano SIFT-C 2.5.2 of T.K. Sharples generates enough control points. I've no problems with this version of Autopano SIFT-C. This solution is already mentioned in

[hugin-ptx] Re: Windows hugin-2010.2.0_rc1 Build

2010-10-05 Thread thePanz
On Oct 5, 2:17 am, JeCh vladimir.ji...@gmail.com wrote: On 5 říj, 00:36, Bruno Postle br...@postle.net wrote: autopano-sift-c isn't part of Hugin.  It sounds like you have a snapshot of autopano-sift-c, the only version we can recommend is the 2.5.1 release. OK, so maybe the installer

[hugin-ptx] Re: Windows hugin-2010.2.0_rc1 Build

2010-10-05 Thread davidefa
- a windows build of autopano-sift-c 2.5.1 can be found at the following address: http://www.sendspace.com/file/0mgb8o ( from this post: http://old.nabble.com/Hugin-2009.4.0-Win-XP-autopano-sift-c-2.5.2-bug-td27435344.html ) - a windows build of autopano-sift-c 2.5.2 16.February.2010 ( not

[hugin-ptx] Re: Windows hugin-2010.2.0_rc1 Build

2010-10-05 Thread Henk Tijdink
I've installed the latest version of Mathew, and the installer has fixed the argument bug. However in Hugin the default settings in the preference screen resets these values when you resets the preferences to the default values. See post

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Windows hugin-2010.2.0_rc1 Build

2010-10-05 Thread Bruno Postle
On Tue 05-Oct-2010 at 00:49 -0700, Henk Tijdink wrote: The solution for autopano SIFT-C is removing the parameters -- projection %f%v in the parameter line in the preference tab. Please don't change the default parameters in any installer, this is how Hugin gets a bad name: it doesn't work.

[hugin-ptx] Re: Windows hugin-2010.2.0_rc1 Build

2010-10-05 Thread Bart van Andel
On 5 okt, 15:34, davidefa goo...@davidefabbri.net wrote: - a windows build of autopano-sift-c 2.5.1 can be found at the following address:http://www.sendspace.com/file/0mgb8o( from this post:http://old.nabble.com/Hugin-2009.4.0-Win-XP-autopano-sift-c-2.5.2-bug... ) Indeed. That's where I

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Windows hugin-2010.2.0_rc1 Build

2010-10-05 Thread Bruno Postle
On Mon 04-Oct-2010 at 17:17 -0700, JeCh wrote: Yes the straighten function has always failed with non-panoramic scenes (i.e. it doesn't work unless there is a spread of yaw values). This has been the same for the last few releases, it isn't going to change soon unless somebody gets annoyed

[hugin-ptx] Re: Windows hugin-2010.2.0_rc1 Build

2010-10-05 Thread Matthew Petroff
On Oct 5, 9:09 am, thePanz thep...@gmail.com wrote: Regarding the arguments bug: I've already fix them in latest installer release, I don't know if Mathew provided a new build with my latest installer script. Here is an installer based on the latest script:

[hugin-ptx] Re: Windows hugin-2010.2.0_rc1 Build

2010-10-04 Thread JeCh
Since we are already in RC state, there are some things which should be fixed IMHO before releasing the final version. I believe those only concern the Windows version. 1) Autopano-SIFT-C (not the multirow/stacked version) doesn't work. It creates only a few control points and those are

[hugin-ptx] Re: Windows hugin-2010.2.0_rc1 Build

2010-10-04 Thread JeCh
On 5 říj, 00:36, Bruno Postle br...@postle.net wrote: autopano-sift-c isn't part of Hugin. It sounds like you have a snapshot of autopano-sift-c, the only version we can recommend is the 2.5.1 release. OK, so maybe the installer should link to this older version, because the linked 2.5.2

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Windows hugin-2010.2.0_rc1 Build

2010-10-03 Thread Yuval Levy
On October 1, 2010 01:04:04 pm thePanz wrote: By the way.. did you enjoy Switzerland? ;) Did you also travel to Italy? I used to live there, and travel very often to Italy. I'm trying to commit to that repo, but I got this response pushing changes to it: sorry, forgot to deal with

[hugin-ptx] Re: Windows hugin-2010.2.0_rc1 Build

2010-10-01 Thread thePanz
On Sep 30, 6:46 pm, Yuval Levy goo...@levy.ch wrote: ciao Emanuele, On September 30, 2010 09:22:51 am thePanz wrote: Ciao Yuval (I noticed now that this isn't the first time you write me in Italian ;) ) the image at [0] is about one hour north-west of you (Milano, right?) ;) Hum, I

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Windows hugin-2010.2.0_rc1 Build

2010-09-30 Thread Oskar Sander
Hi! I must admitt i am not the best in class reading READMEs.Installing that runtime library fixed my enblend problem. However, I had the same problem with *both *enblend_openmp.exe and enblend.exe So it seems like there is a dependency (wrong?) also with the ordinary enblend version?

[hugin-ptx] Re: Windows hugin-2010.2.0_rc1 Build

2010-09-30 Thread thePanz
ciao Emanuele, Ciao Yuval (I noticed now that this isn't the first time you write me in Italian ;) ) what I mean for Mercurial Sub-Repositories is here: http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/Subrepositories, we could split Hugin (core) development from various installers. Interesting.  But

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Windows hugin-2010.2.0_rc1 Build

2010-09-30 Thread Yuval Levy
Hi Oskar, On September 30, 2010 04:03:35 am Oskar Sander wrote: I must admitt i am not the best in class reading READMEs.Installing that runtime library fixed my enblend problem. what is Microsoft's license about distributing the runtime? If I was building/distributing an installer with an

[hugin-ptx] Re: Windows hugin-2010.2.0_rc1 Build

2010-09-29 Thread T. Modes
Hi Yuv, I have an issue with your fixes to the second FAQ [1], Thomas. I reverted the changes. First of all, you have made it completely Windows-centric.  The choices exist also for other platform.  For example the most current build for Debian / Ubuntu has enblend-mp and enfuse-mp (for

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Windows hugin-2010.2.0_rc1 Build

2010-09-29 Thread Yuval Levy
ciao Emanuele, On September 28, 2010 05:12:29 am thePanz wrote: what I mean for Mercurial Sub-Repositories is here: http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/Subrepositories, we could split Hugin (core) development from various installers. Interesting. But there are a lot of caveats. We'll need

[hugin-ptx] Re: Windows hugin-2010.2.0_rc1 Build

2010-09-28 Thread thePanz
Hi, I've updated my installers with some new features and fixed the Multirow/stacked control point generation. Further details (and downloads) are here: http://thepanz.netsons.org/post/hugin-2010-2-0-rc1-installer @Yuv: sorry for my delay! In reply to your eMail about subrepositories, what I mean

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Windows hugin-2010.2.0_rc1 Build

2010-09-28 Thread Oskar Sander
Hey there! I just sucessfully downloaded your 32b installer with all controll point generators and it seems to work perfectly so far! Tanks alot! One problem i seem always have lately with the hugin kits, is the enblend.exe doesnt run on my XP. The system cannot execute the specified

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Windows hugin-2010.2.0_rc1 Build

2010-09-28 Thread Yuval Levy
Hi Oskar, On September 28, 2010 06:50:42 am Oskar Sander wrote: One problem i seem always have lately with the hugin kits, is the enblend.exe doesnt run on my XP. The system cannot execute the specified command this happens for both the ordinary and the openmp versions. what processor do

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Windows hugin-2010.2.0_rc1 Build

2010-09-28 Thread Oskar Sander
Thanks, My computer is running XP Professional SP2, Intel Core2 Duo P8600, 2.4GHz Before adding that to the list of non-supported CPUs, shoudnt that generation have the SSE2? Cheers 2010/9/28 Yuval Levy goo...@levy.ch Hi Oskar, On September 28, 2010 06:50:42 am Oskar Sander wrote: One

[hugin-ptx] Re: Windows hugin-2010.2.0_rc1 Build

2010-09-28 Thread T. Modes
Hi Oskar, My computer is running XP Professional SP2,   Intel Core2 Duo P8600, 2.4GHz Before adding that to the list of non-supported CPUs, shoudnt that generation have the SSE2? have you installed the Microsoft Visual C++ 2008 Redistributable Package (x86)? This is necessary to run the

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Windows hugin-2010.2.0_rc1 Build

2010-09-28 Thread Yuval Levy
On September 28, 2010 11:47:37 am T. Modes wrote: Hi Oskar, My computer is running XP Professional SP2, Intel Core2 Duo P8600, 2.4GHz Before adding that to the list of non-supported CPUs, shoudnt that generation have the SSE2? have you installed the Microsoft Visual C++ 2008

[hugin-ptx] Re: Windows hugin-2010.2.0_rc1 Build

2010-09-27 Thread kfj
On Sep 27, 6:06 am, Yuval Levy goo...@levy.ch wrote: Windows is a pain because of the lack of package manager.  You should really give Kubuntu a try.  There is, of course, a learning curve, but I think you'll be delighted. Actually I'm runing a double boot system with Windows XP SP3 and

[hugin-ptx] Re: Windows hugin-2010.2.0_rc1 Build

2010-09-27 Thread kfj
On Sep 27, 1:11 am, Bruno Postle br...@postle.net wrote: On Sun 26-Sep-2010 at 10:20 -0700, kfj wrote: The matching of every photo with every other photo is 'expensive' in computation, particularly with projects with hundreds of photos.   Worse than that, nearly all the comparisons between

[hugin-ptx] Re: Windows hugin-2010.2.0_rc1 Build

2010-09-27 Thread Matthew Petroff
On Sep 25, 1:34 pm, thePanz thep...@gmail.com wrote: And thank you for the Windows build (could you also provide a x64 one?) I finally was able to setup a build environment for x64. However, I do not have a 64bit Windows installation so the build is untested. The build is available here:

[hugin-ptx] Re: Windows hugin-2010.2.0_rc1 Build

2010-09-26 Thread T. Modes
Excellent! Now it all runs smoothly. Your solution to omit the 'Autopano-SIFT-C (multirow/stacked)' entry is actually the cleanest solution, since the creation of panoramas from brackets with special treatment for stacks is something quite advanced anyway. Best to leave it out of the

[hugin-ptx] Re: Windows hugin-2010.2.0_rc1 Build

2010-09-26 Thread kfj
On Sep 26, 9:18 am, T. Modes thomas.mo...@gmx.de wrote: That's simply wrong. The multirow/stack option has also advantages for simple panoramas. It is faster (in most cases) in comparision to match all images at once, and more important it reduces drastically the risk of getting wrong

[hugin-ptx] Re: Windows hugin-2010.2.0_rc1 Build

2010-09-26 Thread T. Modes
Just removing it from the installer doesn't mean the user can't use it in the future. It's just a matter of creating a new CPG entry and populating it with the desired calls. I agree that stacks are a good thing, that's why I tried to find a way of keeping the entry by replacing the two-step

[hugin-ptx] Re: Windows hugin-2010.2.0_rc1 Build

2010-09-26 Thread kfj
On Sep 26, 6:04 pm, T. Modes thomas.mo...@gmx.de wrote: You can use the multi-row detector also with other cp detectors (like panomatic, select then one-step detector). But using the two-step approach (involving autopano/generatekeys from autopano-sift-c) has advantages. In this case each

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Windows hugin-2010.2.0_rc1 Build

2010-09-26 Thread Bruno Postle
On Sat 25-Sep-2010 at 08:43 -0700, kfj wrote: On Sep 25, 2:52 pm, Bruno Postle br...@postle.net wrote: This is an older version of match-n-shift, recent versions use autopano-sift-c directly instead of generatekeys/autopano. Thanks for pointing that out. Where could I get a recent version of

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Windows hugin-2010.2.0_rc1 Build

2010-09-26 Thread Bruno Postle
On Sun 26-Sep-2010 at 10:20 -0700, kfj wrote: I'd like to understand this process properly. I ran a test with a panorama from 8 brackets of 3 images each, using align_image_stack as the stack aligner and the generatekeys/autopano combination for the interstack alignment. First CPs were

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Windows hugin-2010.2.0_rc1 Build

2010-09-26 Thread Yuval Levy
On September 26, 2010 03:18:49 am T. Modes wrote: The multirow/stack option has also advantages for simple panoramas. it is IMHO probably the best default choice. Advanced users can fiddle with other things if they want. Yuv signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message

[hugin-ptx] Re: Windows hugin-2010.2.0_rc1 Build

2010-09-25 Thread kfj
On Sep 25, 4:23 am, Matthew Petroff matt...@mpetroff.net wrote: Here is a new installer based on the latest script:http://www.box.net/shared/hnf7vgtjp2 All of the control point generators should install properly now. The downloading of the CPGs is now correct, but I'm sorry to say: their

RE: [hugin-ptx] Re: Windows hugin-2010.2.0_rc1 Build

2010-09-25 Thread PhG
this install is working fine on my win 2K SP4 :) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Windows hugin-2010.2.0_rc1 Build

2010-09-25 Thread Bruno Postle
On Sat 25-Sep-2010 at 03:01 -0700, kfj wrote: If I understand match-n-shift correctly, it is a perl script which combines several programs to achieve it's goal: a) it calls PTmender to warp the images according to their projection b) it calls generatekeys.exe to extract SIFT features from the

[hugin-ptx] Re: Windows hugin-2010.2.0_rc1 Build

2010-09-25 Thread kfj
On Sep 25, 2:52 pm, Bruno Postle br...@postle.net wrote: This is an older version of match-n-shift, recent versions use autopano-sift-c directly instead of generatekeys/autopano. Thanks for pointing that out. Where could I get a recent version of it anyway? KFJ -- You received this

[hugin-ptx] Re: Windows hugin-2010.2.0_rc1 Build

2010-09-25 Thread thePanz
Hi Mattew, thanks for your edits to my installer scripts! :) And thank you for the Windows build (could you also provide a x64 one?) On Sep 25, 4:23 am, Matthew Petroff matt...@mpetroff.net wrote: Control point generator settings are stored in the registry. To remove them you had to check Clean

[hugin-ptx] Re: Windows hugin-2010.2.0_rc1 Build

2010-09-25 Thread Matthew Petroff
On Sep 25, 8:52 am, Bruno Postle br...@postle.net wrote: there is no need to ship match-n-shift.exe with a Hugin installer. I made further changes to the installer, removing match-n-shift and the autopano option that used generatekeys.exe since they do not seem necessary. I also added an install

[hugin-ptx] Re: Windows hugin-2010.2.0_rc1 Build

2010-09-25 Thread kfj
On Sep 25, 8:31 pm, Matthew Petroff matt...@mpetroff.net wrote: I made further changes to the installer, removing match-n-shift and the autopano option that used generatekeys.exe since they do not seem necessary. I also added an install option to clean the registry before installing, to

[hugin-ptx] Re: Windows hugin-2010.2.0_rc1 Build

2010-09-24 Thread kfj
I've made the effort to actually uninstall and delete whatever bit of hugin I could track down, including installation directories and start menu entries, on my Windows system, to try and make a fresh install with no relics from previous installations. Then I installed into a new path. Again I

[hugin-ptx] Re: Windows hugin-2010.2.0_rc1 Build

2010-09-24 Thread Matthew Petroff
Here is a new installer based on the latest script: http://www.box.net/shared/hnf7vgtjp2 All of the control point generators should install properly now. All of them work properly for me on a clean install except match-n- shift. When selected, hugin runs PTmender instead, but I can't figure out

[hugin-ptx] Re: Windows hugin-2010.2.0_rc1 Build and autocrop in fast preview.

2010-09-23 Thread kfj
On Sep 23, 3:22 pm, Henk Tijdink h.tijd...@gmail.com wrote: More people experiencing this on Windows or other systems? Is that a bug or is it on purpose? My 2010.2.0.rc1 Windows installation behaves the same way, as does a previous build I have installed that offers autocrop. I don't know

[hugin-ptx] Re: Windows hugin-2010.2.0_rc1 Build

2010-09-21 Thread kfj
On Sep 16, 2:38 am, Matthew Petroff matt...@mpetroff.net wrote: A Hugin 2010.2.0 rc1 build for Windows can be found here:http://www.box.net/shared/k5zn0d9bsh A Windows installer can be found here:http://www.box.net/shared/bxcdivzsaz Matthew I have downloaded the Windows installer and run

[hugin-ptx] Re: Windows hugin-2010.2.0_rc1 Build

2010-09-20 Thread kfj
On Sep 20, 5:09 pm, Oskar Sander oskar.san...@gmail.com wrote:  Is this using the new windows installer, any experiences on the list using this build? I downloaded the first of the two and just put the directory somewhere low in the path (some auxiliary software has issues with spaces in file