Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: new c++ code for environment images and reprojection

On Monday, June 10, 2024 at 10:09:23 AM UTC+2 kfj wrote: I think maybe there's an issue. I get this message: [vost#0:0/libx264 @ 0x558d9c0040c0] More than 1000 frames duplicated My mistake - I tried to generate the video with 60 fps, and the default for the (single-image) input seems to be

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: new c++ code for environment images and reprojection

On 08.06.24 22:51, 'chaosjug' via hugin and other free panoramic software wrote: Some more info can be found here: https://ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg-filters.html#v360 https://ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg-filters.html#sendcmd_002c-asendcmd Thanks as well for these links! I've read through the documentation, and

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: new c++ code for environment images and reprojection

On 08.06.24 22:51, 'chaosjug' via hugin and other free panoramic software wrote: Hi, ffmpg is capable to do this in one go. It's been a while since I did this so I must admit that I don't completely understand what I did, but this should create a 360° rotation pan of a panorama image: ffmpeg

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: new c++ code for environment images and reprojection

Hi, ffmpg is capable to do this in one go. It's been a while since I did this so I must admit that I don't completely understand what I did, but this should create a 360° rotation pan of a panorama image: ffmpeg -loop 1 -i panorama_image.jpg -vf

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: What are the keypoints to create 360 panorama ?

I would remove the '--linearmatch' parameter, as this prevents the last image being matched with the first image. (You could try '--multirow' instead, but this shouldn't be necessary) Possibly also removing the 'cpclean' command would help in this case, but I can't test from here. -- Bruno On

Re: [hugin-ptx] How line CPs really work (to level a panorama)

For whatever reason, 2 images failed to upload in my last post, which is quite annoying as it breaks the explanation I took hours to write. At least their names are shown in place, so you can follow the explanation by replacing "Screenshot_2024-05-26_20-37-45-2.jpg" by:

Re: [hugin-ptx] How line CPs really work (to level a panorama)

chamele...@protonmail.com schrieb am Samstag, 25. Mai 2024 um 03:36:28 UTC+2: So I'll slightly rectify my stand : 2 line CPs is still the most predictable, but like with any other number of lines, beware of not making them parallel in 3D space. When you are using horizontal lines on the

Re: [hugin-ptx] How line CPs really work (to level a panorama)

Sorry, accidental mail delivery before review. And I made a mistake: I said "longitude" but meant latitude. -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and

Re: [hugin-ptx] How line CPs really work (to level a panorama)

> The distance is calculated in the output projection, not in the 3D space. So > the selected projection affects the line control points error. I was wondering if that was the case. Thanks for the correction. > In an equirectangular projection only the horizon is a horizontal line. All > other

Re: [hugin-ptx] How line CPs really work (to level a panorama)

On Wed, 22 May 2024, 17:01 'ChameleonScales' wrote: > Please correct me where I'm wrong or confirm if I'm right. > > To my experience and reasoning, horizontal or vertical line CPs never > affect the relative positions of photos when optimizing. Only the > orientation of the panoramic sphere as a

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: What are the keypoints to create 360 panorama ?

On Tue, 21 May 2024, 13:49 Wade Wang wrote: > > 'multirow' is what you want, it tries to match all the ends of > whatever chains are created after running a 'linearmatch'. Inspired by this, I find I can achieve my goal (matching only feature > points between adjacent images and the last image

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: What are the keypoints to create 360 panorama ?

> 'multirow' is what you want, it tries to match all the ends of whatever chains are created after running a 'linearmatch'. Inspired by this, I find I can achieve my goal (matching only feature points between adjacent images and the last image matching the first image) by two steps, the first

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: What are the keypoints to create 360 panorama ?

On Tue, 21 May 2024, 10:10 Wade Wang wrote: > 1.I find we can not use --multirow and --linearmatch simultaneously > because they are mutually exclusive, then can I achieve my goal (matching > only feature points between adjacent images and the last image matching the > first image) ? >

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Linux on Chromebook -> assert ""cr"" failed in wxPaintDCImpl(): using wxPaintDC without being in a native paint event

Hi Thomas, Thanks, it is good to know it has already been fixed although there is no 2024 build yet.. The wxwidgets versions on my Chromebook debian linux bookworm version are: apt list --installed | grep -i wx libwxbase3.2-1/stable,now 3.2.2+dfsg-2 amd64 [installed,automatic]

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: cpfind manual not very clear

Thanks. That clarifies things. I was hoping it was the CP distance but in a different unit (not pixels) but the formula is only made of statistic values and a coefficient, so there is no way to predictably reduce the minimum CP distance under a specific value like you can do in the interface

Re: [hugin-ptx] How does "Straighten" really work?

Thank you very much for this in-depth explanation. One aspect I wasn't 100% sure about and which your explanation seems to confirm, is that if you shoot your photos on a tilted plane like this (brown=earth, blue=sky) : [Screenshot_2024-05-17_16-02-20.jpg] then the Straighten button should

Re: [hugin-ptx] Mac builds of Hugin

Crashes here too straight away. Probably compiler issue. A few libs will not work out of the box after compilation. I shared my findings and workarounds in several posts. I do not have the time to dig blindly in a crashing build but the person sharing this build might benefit of getting some

Re: [hugin-ptx] Mac builds of Hugin

There are often reports about crashes in the Mac build in the bug tracker: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hugin/+bug/2045446 But nobody seems to take care of them? -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because

Re: [hugin-ptx] How does "Straighten" really work?

On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 12:58:52PM +, 'ChameleonScales' via hugin and other free panoramic software wrote: > Thank you. That answered part of my question. I'm still wondering how > it determines the orientation of the panorama though. > > Let's say I take photos with a panoramic head at

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: cpfind manual not very clear

chamele...@protonmail.com schrieb am Dienstag, 14. Mai 2024 um 15:25:00 UTC+2: I can't find documentation of what that sigma value really is. Can someone explain it ? Under step 1in the manual: calculates for each pair mean and standard deviation sigma The statistics the standard deviation

Re: [hugin-ptx] How does "Straighten" really work?

Hi, I cannot answer all of your questions but I hope my description will help you. Assume you have multiple images (Img1, Img2, Img3, Img4, Img5) covering a 360x180 field-of-view. The images are stitched using hugin and projected onto a full spherical surface. The assumption can be extended to

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: cpfind manual not very clear

I can't find documentation of what that sigma value really is. Can someone explain it ? On Sunday, May 22nd, 2022 at 1:10 PM, 'ChameleonScales' via hugin and other free panoramic software wrote: > Thanks, I think you just wrote a better version of the manual. > I think that "disregarding

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Follow specific conversation using email?

> How would you find out about conversations that you *might* want to become > part of??? By going to https://groups.google.com/g/hugin-ptx I prefer to use that to explore and search topics but not rely on a Google account to write messages. It seems the only way is to use a Google account to

Re: [hugin-ptx] How does "Straighten" really work?

Thank you. That answered part of my question. I'm still wondering how it determines the orientation of the panorama though. Let's say I take photos with a panoramic head at random y,p,r orientations (so there can even be photos taken in portrait format, others in landscape and all the

Re: [hugin-ptx] Problems stitching with newer versions of Hugin

On Tuesday, 7 May 2024 at 16:19:55 +, wirz wrote: > On 07/05/2024 10:19, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: >> On Monday, 6 May 2024 at 15:58:31 +, wirz wrote: >>> While I don't know what differs between the versions of hugin / >>> enblend that are packaged in freeBSD, your images very much look

Re: [hugin-ptx] How does "Straighten" really work?

On 5/6/24 23:59, 'ChameleonScales' via hugin and other free panoramic software wrote: I did not make a very thoughtful assumption. Let me make a new one for what I think it does: * determine a single set of pitch and roll values that is closest to as many photos as possible * apply the

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Follow specific conversation using email?

On 5/6/24 23:48, 'ChameleonScales' via hugin and other free panoramic software wrote: Thanks but I already do all of that. What I'd like is to not receive mails from conversations I'm not a part of, but I guess that's impossible. It would be difficult. How would you find out about

Re: [hugin-ptx] Problems stitching with newer versions of Hugin

On 07/05/2024 21:59, 'T. Modes' via hugin and other free panoramic software wrote: lukas wirz schrieb am Dienstag, 7. Mai 2024 um 18:20:03 UTC+2: That's slightly old, the version has been 4.3 for a bit. Just to make it more clear. The last released version is 4.2. The current development in

Re: [hugin-ptx] Problems stitching with newer versions of Hugin

lukas wirz schrieb am Dienstag, 7. Mai 2024 um 18:20:03 UTC+2: That's slightly old, the version has been 4.3 for a bit. Just to make it more clear. The last released version is 4.2. The current development in the default branch of the repository is using the version 4.3 to identify. This will

Re: [hugin-ptx] Problems stitching with newer versions of Hugin

On 07/05/2024 10:19, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: On Monday, 6 May 2024 at 15:58:31 +, wirz wrote: On 06/05/2024 06:05, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: I've been making documentary panoramas of my house every week for the past 10 years, and for a long time I was using version 2018.0.0 of hugin

Re: [hugin-ptx] Thank for stopping hugin-ptx mail.

Thank you very much, Bruno Bernard * Bruno Postle , le 07-05-24, a écrit: > Done, you shouldn't get any more posts from the group - Bruno > > On Tue, 7 May 2024, 12:23 Bernard Lang, wrote: > > > Help please > > I try to stop being sent email by the Google Groups "hugin and other free > >

Re: [hugin-ptx] I am not a member, but I cannot quit receiving mail from the group

Done, you shouldn't get any more posts from the group - Bruno On Tue, 7 May 2024, 12:23 Bernard Lang, wrote: > Help please > I try to stop being sent email by the Google Groups "hugin and other free > panoramic software" group. > The only answer I received is that the group will not do anything

Re: [hugin-ptx] I am not a member, but I cannot quit receiving mail from the group

Help please I try to stop being sent email by the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. The only answer I received is that the group will not do anything because I am not a member. Can someone help me. I think the address used to send me these mails is

Re: [hugin-ptx] How does "Straighten" really work?

I did not make a very thoughtful assumption. Let me make a new one for what I think it does: - determine a single set of pitch and roll values that is closest to as many photos as possible - apply the inverse of this set of values to each photo Am I getting closer ? It's been a little more

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Follow specific conversation using email?

Thanks but I already do all of that. What I'd like is to not receive mails from conversations I'm not a part of, but I guess that's impossible. -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed

Re: [hugin-ptx] Problems stitching with newer versions of Hugin

On Monday, 6 May 2024 at 15:58:31 +, wirz wrote: > On 06/05/2024 06:05, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: >> I've been making documentary panoramas of my house every week for the >> past 10 years, and for a long time I was using version 2018.0.0 of >> hugin on an old machine that I didn't plan to

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Xpano

It is possible to tweak the opencv algorithms for keypoint detection, feature matching, descriptors, etcetera for both panos, blending but also "fusing" layers of images. I wrote an extremely simple python script to try it out for panos and also write some python scripts for "fusing". But to be

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Xpano

On Thu, 2 May 2024, 16:54 'T. Modes' wrote: > > This is "only" a GUI for the panorama functions in the OpenCV. library It > does not implement own panorama stitching algorithms. > In my simple tests the results were good for some projects, but for other > projects it works not so good. > There

Re: [hugin-ptx] Xpano

On 5/1/24 21:31, Bruno Postle wrote: Has anyone tried xpano? https://krupkat.github.io/xpano/ "Automated photo stiching tool. Import a directory of images and then export auto detected panoramas. "The tool focuses on simplicity and ease of use, features include: * Auto detection of groups

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Question about Lux and PTO files

On 4/26/24 23:43, 'Kay F. Jahnke' via hugin and other free panoramic software wrote: On 27.04.24 11:04, David W. Jones wrote: On April 26, 2024 10:35:22 PM HST, "'Kay F. Jahnke' via hugin and other free panoramic software" wrote: I think 'Panini Perspective Tool' made an attempt ... I

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Question about Lux and PTO files

On 27.04.24 11:04, David W. Jones wrote: On April 26, 2024 10:35:22 PM HST, "'Kay F. Jahnke' via hugin and other free panoramic software" wrote: I think 'Panini Perspective Tool' made an attempt ... I think I found their site: well found - I

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Question about Lux and PTO files

On April 26, 2024 10:35:22 PM HST, "'Kay F. Jahnke' via hugin and other free panoramic software" wrote: > On 27.04.24 10:21, David W. Jones wrote: > > > > I agree, lux is an achievement. It's the only image viewer besides Hugin > > that can view PTO files. > > I think 'Panini Perspective

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Question about Lux and PTO files

On 27.04.24 10:21, David W. Jones wrote: I agree, lux is an achievement. It's the only image viewer besides Hugin that can view PTO files. I think 'Panini Perspective Tool' made an attempt or at least a claim - didn't they come up with a 'pro' version after some time asking for money? I

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Question about Lux and PTO files

On April 25, 2024 10:44:09 PM HST, 'kfj' via hugin and other free panoramic software wrote: > > On Friday, April 26, 2024 at 10:16:56 AM UTC+2 GnomeNomad wrote: > > Thanks, but I think the on-screen view should show the output crop, the way > Hugin does without having to load the stitched

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Question about Lux and PTO files

There are some options which may help you (copied from https://kfj.bitbucket.io/lux_options.html): snapshot_prefix This option sets the prefix used for snapshots, stitches and fusions. The default is to use the source image's filename suffixed with .lux. If you pass

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Question about Lux and PTO files

i was wondering, is there a command in lux to save files with only the .jpg extension and forego the .pto.lux.[number].jpg extension? -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Question about Lux and PTO files

On Friday, April 26, 2024 at 10:16:56 AM UTC+2 GnomeNomad wrote: Thanks, but I think the on-screen view should show the output crop, the way Hugin does without having to load the stitched image manually. Well, at times you just don't get what you want ;-) If you look at what hugin shows you

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Question about Lux and PTO files

Thanks, but I think the on-screen view should show the output crop, the way Hugin does without having to load the stitched image manually. On April 25, 2024 8:23:48 PM HST, 'kfj' via hugin and other free panoramic software wrote: > Maybe you misunderstand something here: output cropping is not

Re: [hugin-ptx] lux 1.2.2 released

if you don't try, you'll never know ;) Op 25-Apr-24 om 11:44 schreef 'kfj' via hugin and other free panoramic software: 'Messing' with a lux batch job is probably not such a good idea ;-) -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You

Re: [hugin-ptx] lux 1.2.2 released

'Messing' with a lux batch job is probably not such a good idea ;-) Overwriting existing image files is only allowed with an okay from the user, and to give that, you have to have lux open, and see the little dialog. I admit this isn't a very good solution for batch jobs. batch jobs are kind

Re: [hugin-ptx] lux 1.2.2 released

maybe not true, it creates a second instance of the same image with a different lux added number. Op 25-Apr-24 om 10:59 schreef Maarten Verberne: it will go and overwrite whatever comes next. -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ ---

Re: [hugin-ptx] lux 1.2.2 released

one other thing i found by accident. if you start a series, like with lux --stitch=yes *.pto and you interrupt (esc) and it restarts itself. it will ask you the first 2 images if you want to skip or overwrite with no option to do this for all files found and after that it will go and overwrite

Re: [hugin-ptx] lux 1.2.2 released

Op 25-Apr-24 om 9:00 schreef 'Kay F. Jahnke' via hugin and other free panoramic software: Nice to hear you're happy with the image quality! I suppose the size issue has sorted itself out with specifying the compression? indeed, the compression setting solved that. try this: lux

Re: [hugin-ptx] lux 1.2.2 released

On Thursday, April 25, 2024 at 12:26:59 AM UTC+2 GnomeNomad wrote: On 4/23/24 22:06, 'kfj' via hugin and other free panoramic software wrote: The UI is made so that you can interact with the view with gestures and usually don't have to use the menu, unless you need to change settings or do

Re: [hugin-ptx] lux 1.2.2 released

On 24.04.24 18:19, mpgve... wrote: had some time and did some testing comparing enblend/nona vs lux. these results are from the same system with the same set of images, results on your system are different ;) image quality was good, sometimes a bit better, sometimes a bit less,

Re: [hugin-ptx] lux 1.2.2 released

On 4/23/24 22:06, 'kfj' via hugin and other free panoramic software wrote: On Tuesday, April 23, 2024 at 9:27:49 AM UTC+2 GnomeNomad wrote: So I clicked right button expecting a menu to pop up. Don't know if it's my bad, but it still seems a thought. I noticed that right click

Re: [hugin-ptx] lux 1.2.2 released

On 4/23/24 23:07, 'kfj' via hugin and other free panoramic software wrote: Sorry, debian users, for uploading a package with unresolved dependencies. Here's the updated package which asks for libexiv2 v.27, which is the one currently distributed with bookworm:

Re: [hugin-ptx] lux 1.2.2 released

had some time and did some testing comparing enblend/nona vs lux. these results are from the same system with the same set of images, results on your system are different ;) image quality was good, sometimes a bit better, sometimes a bit less, depending on lighting conditions that make

Re: [hugin-ptx] lux 1.2.2 released

On Wednesday, April 24, 2024 at 10:58:57 AM UTC+2 hvd...@gmail.com wrote: The AppImage does not run on my Chromebook with beta linux, which is the reported debian bookworm by the way. It starts flashing and completely blocks everything. But that could be because it is linux running in a

Re: [hugin-ptx] lux 1.2.2 released

Sorry, debian users, for uploading a package with unresolved dependencies. Here's the updated package which asks for libexiv2 v.27, which is the one currently distributed with bookworm: https://bitbucket.org/kfj/pv/downloads/lux-1.2.2-x86_64.deb Please download and install again - if there are

Re: [hugin-ptx] lux 1.2.2 released

> > > I uploaded a debian package > for debian > 12 stable. It might be usable for other debian-based distros. > > Thanks, downloaded, tried it. It installed over the 1.1.6 that was there > before. Trying to run lux in a terminal gave

Re: [hugin-ptx] lux 1.2.2 released

On Tuesday, April 23, 2024 at 9:27:49 AM UTC+2 GnomeNomad wrote: So I clicked right button expecting a menu to pop up. Don't know if it's my bad, but it still seems a thought. I noticed that right click does other things in Lux, so maybe ctrl-right-click to bring up the menu, starting

Re: [hugin-ptx] lux 1.2.0 released > 1.2.2

On 23.04.24 22:21, Maarten Verberne wrote: I did a small test, my first impression is that it's quicker. If your panoramas are not very large and you have enough memory, using lux should be faster, because it can keep everything in memory and does not need temporary files. It's also fully

Re: [hugin-ptx] lux 1.2.0 released > 1.2.2

I did a small test, my first impression is that it's quicker. in the pto states that jpg compression should be 100% (no compression) they have the same resolution, so that's fine. but the resulting jpg files are a factor 4 smaller in size than with my nona/enblend combo and actually have a

Re: [hugin-ptx] lux 1.2.0 released

thanks a lot, i'm always struggling with delayed expansion, so i put it all on one line :) i just tested this on a file and although '-DateTimeOriginal>FileModifyDate' gave a Error: File not found by removing that, the error was gone without me missing out on exif data. in windows, the exif

Re: [hugin-ptx] lux 1.2.0 released > 1.2.2

On 23.04.24 09:35, Maarten Verberne wrote: for me, the text editing way is much easyer because i only have the folder and image number that i need to change and i can automate that. When I fuse brackets, I also put each bracket in a separate folder. Then I run a script which visits all

Re: [hugin-ptx] lux 1.2.0 released > 1.2.2

Op 23-Apr-24 om 8:11 schreef 'Kay F. Jahnke' via hugin and other free panoramic software: On 22.04.24 12:29, Maarten Verberne wrote: all those similar pto files just for the imagenumber does sound a bit excessive. but hey, if that's the way. There's nothing stopping you from modifying

Re: [hugin-ptx] lux 1.2.2 released

On 4/22/24 20:52, 'kfj' via hugin and other free panoramic software wrote: It still has difficulty displaying the old PTO, but I created a new one using current Hugin, using the original images, and Lux has the same problem with it. I checked in Hugin, the images from my friend's

Re: [hugin-ptx] lux 1.2.2 released

It still has difficulty displaying the old PTO, but I created a new one using current Hugin, using the original images, and Lux has the same problem with it. I checked in Hugin, the images from my friend's camera-that-he's-so-proud-of come in with a 5.75deg field of view. I think I'll stick

Re: [hugin-ptx] lux 1.2.0 released

On 22.04.24 12:29, Maarten Verberne wrote: all those similar pto files just for the imagenumber does sound a bit excessive. but hey, if that's the way. There's nothing stopping you from modifying the PTO files as text files with any old text processing tool. But lux needs a PTO file which

Re: [hugin-ptx] lux 1.2.2 released

On 4/22/24 01:14, 'kfj' via hugin and other free panoramic software wrote: Sorry everybody who downloaded 1.2.0. There was a bug in it which prevented it from displaying PTO files with images with alpha channel correctly - just viewing images is fine. So I decided to do a bug fix release.

Re: [hugin-ptx] lux 1.2.0 released

For lux, you need a PTO file as input if you want to stitch. I don't now about the templates and things you're using. so instead of one pto per folder, so it can get the warping settings identical over all files, i need one pto per image file set? So, first you have to make the PTO - there

Re: [hugin-ptx] lux 1.2.0 released

On 4/21/24 22:33, 'kfj' via hugin and other free panoramic software wrote: On Monday, April 22, 2024 at 10:21:07 AM UTC+2 GnomeNomad wrote: Ah, thanks. I tried dragging around in the blank window but couldn't remember how to zoom in/out. Centering the viewing area sounds like a

Re: [hugin-ptx] lux 1.2.0 released

On 22.04.24 11:21, Maarten Verberne wrote: the command line is like this, with use of gpu for nona: set nona="%ProgramFiles%\Hugin\bin\nona.exe" set enblend="%ProgramFiles%\Hugin\bin\enblend.exe"     %nona% -g -o out -m TIFF_m template.pto %Rfolder%/%date%/IMG_%imagenr%.JPG

Re: [hugin-ptx] lux 1.2.0 released

batch stitching with lux is quite simple. All lux needs to stitch a PTO is a command line like this: lux --stitch=yes my.pto and to stitch several, just pass them all on the command line: lux --stitch=yes *.pto The resulting files are named automatically and no metadata are transferred, if you

Re: [hugin-ptx] lux 1.2.0 released

On Monday, April 22, 2024 at 10:29:55 AM UTC+2 mpgve...@gmail.com wrote: thanks kfj, a better GUI is always great. You're welcome! what david wrote about pto not working is only with specific image formats? I'm guessing with JPG the template.pto file still works? We've figured it out,

Re: [hugin-ptx] lux 1.2.0 released

On Monday, April 22, 2024 at 10:21:07 AM UTC+2 GnomeNomad wrote: Ah, thanks. I tried dragging around in the blank window but couldn't remember how to zoom in/out. Centering the viewing area sounds like a good idea. It might be a bug in whatever version of Hugin I was using in 2013. I have

Re: [hugin-ptx] lux 1.2.0 released

thanks kfj, a better GUI is always great. what david wrote about pto not working is only with specific image formats? I'm guessing with JPG the template.pto file still works? Although Thomas once showed me how i could do my stitching via the GUI, that method appeared a lot slower and more

Re: [hugin-ptx] lux 1.2.0 released

Ah, thanks. I tried dragging around in the blank window but couldn't remember how to zoom in/out. Centering the viewing area sounds like a good idea. It  might be a bug in whatever version of Hugin I was using in 2013. I have another PTO that I had made with the same version, and got

Re: [hugin-ptx] lux 1.2.0 released

Thanks for posting the PTO. I also got a black screen from it. The problem is that the visible content is outside of the viewing area. If you zoom out a good bit or start lux with --hfov_view=90, you'll see the images (which have quite small hfov of 14 degrees) near the top of the view. The

Re: [hugin-ptx] lux 1.2.0 released

On Sunday, April 21, 2024 at 9:26:56 PM UTC+2 GnomeNomad wrote: Thanks, always good to have an improved GUI. I ran the appimage from the command line, it gave me a window to open files. I went to open a PTO file, and got a blank black screen. Nothing happened. Nothing displayed. When I

Re: [hugin-ptx] lux 1.2.0 released

Thanks, always good to have an improved GUI. I ran the appimage from the command line, it gave me a window to open files. I went to open a PTO file, and got a blank black screen. Nothing happened. Nothing displayed. When I pressed Escape, the window blank display went away and I saw this in

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Stereo image alignment

Maybe I read too much into Vladimir's recommendation: https://wiki.panotools.org/Talk:Align_image_stack *->* http://vndlinuxphoto.blogspot.com/2011/01/stereo-image-alignment-in-hugin.html *->* align_image_stack -p aligned.pto -a aligned -m -i -P -C *right.jpg left.jpg* He names two files and

Re: [hugin-ptx] Purpose of this list

[image: davi...@gmail.com's profile photo] davi...@gmail.com Thank you for your careful reading of my posts, your understanding of the reason behind my questions and your support. Chris On Thursday, April 18, 2024 at 11:15:02 AM UTC+1 davi...@gmail.com wrote: > Le 18/04/2024 à 09:19, Greg

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Stereo image alignment

Yes, I understood that, but this thread is about stereo image alignment. You need 2 images for that, so how does it pick 2 out of for example 10 images? Or does it assume the first one in order is the left-hand image and then treat all the others as right-hand ones and match them to it? Or

Re: [hugin-ptx] Purpose of this list

Le 18/04/2024 à 09:19, Greg 'groggy' Lehey a écrit : On Wednesday, 17 April 2024 at 23:39:07 -0700, Chris wrote: T.Modes, Wie du sicher weißt, bedeutet das deutsche Wort "Gift" etwas ganz anderes als das englische Wort "gift" :). Vielleicht sind die Worte "impliziert" und "implies" falsche

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Stereo image alignment

On Wed, 17 Apr 2024, 20:33 Chris wrote: > OK. It wouldn't have occurred to me do this because there could be ten > files in the "glob". Would it just take the first 2, and assume that the > first one was the right-hand image and the second the left-hand? align_image_stack will align as many

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Stereo image alignment

OK. It wouldn't have occurred to me do this because there could be ten files in the "glob". Would it just take the first 2, and assume that the first one was the right-hand image and the second the left-hand? On Wednesday, April 17, 2024 at 7:38:10 AM UTC+1 bruno...@gmail.com wrote: > On Wed,

Re: [hugin-ptx] Mac builds of Hugin

Alright, thanks. I'll try to have a look. Le mercredi 17 avril 2024 à 12:36:32 UTC+2, dud...@gmail.com a écrit : > Nice to hear. > I didn't add any more automation than what is already done in mac section. > Since there are a few bugs/conflicts that needs some attention I take care > of those

Re: [hugin-ptx] Mac builds of Hugin

Nice to hear. I didn't add any more automation than what is already done in mac section. Since there are a few bugs/conflicts that needs some attention I take care of those manually for now. Would be cool if you manage to simplify  Den ons 17 apr. 2024 12:04Philippe Bernery skrev: > Hey

Re: [hugin-ptx] Mac builds of Hugin

Hey everyone, I am new to this group, and just wanted to say thank you @dudek53 for your build. I was planning to build Hugin myself and discovered this discussion. The build works fine on my machine (MacBook Pro M3). I thought about doing a Brew Recipe, or something similar. Did you automate

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Stereo image alignment

On Wed, 17 Apr 2024, 07:13 Chris wrote: > T modes:"*No, you can also use placeholder like ? or *. "* > This is undocumented so far as I can see. > This is normal filename globbing. The ? and * characters are usually expanded into a list of files by the operating system. align_image_stack only

Re: [hugin-ptx] Mac ?

Solved! This message may help mac users facing the same problem. Phillip sent me a built of the last version he made, and it was impossible to run on my macbook pro (chip M2 max, MacOS 14.4.1). The error message was:

Re: [hugin-ptx] Why does my system try to open plain text files in Hugin?

Thanks, Carl, for the advice. I have XFCE 4.14. It didn't let me change the applications at all. So I figured out how to get in as root and run an XFCE session from there. Sorted out other XFCE settings (I'd never run XFCE as root on this system before), checked what applications showed for

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: OpenMP CMakeLists.txt patch

Disabling openMP seems like something that is useful when during debugging one wants to know if some malfunction is a threading race condition. But for compiling the application for the end-user disabling openMP sounds strange to me... -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at:

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: OpenMP CMakeLists.txt patch

On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 05:14:28 -0700 (PDT) "'T. Modes' via hugin and other free panoramic software" wrote: > Markus Meier schrieb am Sonntag, 24. März 2024 um 10:02:49 UTC+1: > > would it be possible to include a fix to explicitly disable OpenMP if > requested by the user? > > > Sorry, but I

Re: [hugin-ptx] Why does my system try to open plain text files in Hugin?

The Settings Manager has a "Personal" area that shows "Preferred Applications". I think that`s where you can change those "Default" applications (third tab). Carl Am 09.04.24 um 09:37 schrieb David W. Jones: On my Debian Bookworm system

Re: [hugin-ptx] Why does my system try to open plain text files in Hugin?

Hi David, have a look at the settings dialog for standard applications. There is a tab for "different" applications. Cheers, Carl (I run my Mac with Xubuntu which also uses  XFCE) Am 09.04.24 um 09:37 schrieb David W. Jones: On my Debian Bookworm system running XFCE, somehow Hugin has been

Re: [hugin-ptx] Disappearing posts

First posts from users stay in the moderation queue until they get approved (I'm a bit slow today as am at a theme park) - Bruno -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: [hugin-ptx] Disappearing posts

Same for me. I saw two identical posts from you about "align_image_stack parameters" Harry -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >