Sharpening in Photoshop or GIMP.
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 1:42 AM, Bruno Postle br...@postle.net wrote:
On Tue 11-Sep-2012 at 13:09 +0200, Rogier Wolff wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:38:55AM +0100, Bruno Postle wrote:
Artificially 'sharpened' images are a special case, you don't find
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 09:42:00PM +0100, Bruno Postle wrote:
Are these photos sharpened?
No, from camera. Not a sony, but a Nikon.
You can see this effect by drawing a one pixel line in an image,
then remapping it in Hugin, it will become 'fuzzy', but remap it
again and it won't get any
This probably an FAQ, but I couldn't find an answer: when do you sharpen
spherical panoramas? Before compositing (i.e. sharpen the original images)
or afterwards, and if so, using what type of projection (I need to output
equirectangular in the end)?
--
You received this message because you
On 11 Sep 2012 07:54, TvE tvoneic...@gmail.com wrote:
This probably an FAQ, but I couldn't find an answer: when do you sharpen
spherical panoramas? Before compositing (i.e. sharpen the original images)
or afterwards, and if so, using what type of projection (I need to output
equirectangular in
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 04:09:50AM -0400, Bruno Postle wrote:
Sharpening doesn't survive remapping very well, so you should apply it to
Right! It looks to me that the remapping takes the average of two
surrounding pixels, on average.
i.e. with an image that COULD map 1 to 1, every source pixel
On 11 September 2012 10:03, Rogier Wolff rew-googlegro...@bitwizard.nl wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 04:09:50AM -0400, Bruno Postle wrote:
Sharpening doesn't survive remapping very well, so you should apply it to
If my math intuition is good, the -0.5 2 -0.5 convolution is the
inverse of
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:38:55AM +0100, Bruno Postle wrote:
On 11 September 2012 10:03, Rogier Wolff rew-googlegro...@bitwizard.nl
wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 04:09:50AM -0400, Bruno Postle wrote:
Sharpening doesn't survive remapping very well, so you should apply it to
If my math
Sender: hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 14:49:42
To: hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
Reply-To: hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [hugin-ptx] when to sharpen?
On 11 September 2012 08:54, TvE wrote:
This probably an FAQ, but I couldn't find an answer: when do you sharpen
On Tue 11-Sep-2012 at 13:09 +0200, Rogier Wolff wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:38:55AM +0100, Bruno Postle wrote:
Artificially 'sharpened' images are a special case, you don't find
this kind of data in 'normal' photos, these don't really suffer any
loss of focus in the standard remapping
