Is the SURF scale and orientation independent per each identified feature
or ar they somehow liked within an image? Is distorsion somehow factored
in?
A thought on unevenly placed CP that often turns out to be a problem for
me. Maybe look at what align_image_stack does. It seems to divide the
Hallo Matthew,
Wednesday, October 20, 2010, 1:10:45 AM, you wrote:
Matthew in the process of uploading zip files to SourceForge. While they are
Matthew considerably larger, they should prove to be more reliable.
Thanks for your effort, much appreciated. I will have opportunity to
download and
Hi James
I also recently had Nona crash with bad allocation, while trying to
reproject a 300 Mpix equirectangular image on a Win32 box with 3 GB
RAM using Hugin version 2010-5063. Nona succeeded when I reduced the
output dimensions from 23000 x 13000 to 2 x 9600.
PTGui had no trouble doing
Thank you Tom for your testing and feedback.
I had the auto control point generators fail also on a past project where I was
taking a pano each day setting a tripod in roughly the same place. The cp
generators would find matches within a days images but would never find matches
from one
Hello All
It is not my own build, but I found on a downloadsite autopano-SIFT-C
2.5.1.
Discovered it in a french panotools forum.http://www.panophoto.org/
forums/viewforum.php?f=67.
It's already there since april 2010.
There you can sometimes find new binaries too of Hugin, not mentioned
on this
On 13 Okt., 21:23, Jan Martin janmar...@diy-streetview.org wrote:
HI all,
I have 8 images around with hfov of 50 degrees and one fisheye with hfov
with 120 degrees for the Zenith.
So autopano-sift-c 2.5.2 fails, because it assumes all image
- having the same hfov.
- having the same
On Sat, 2010-10-23 at 00:09 +0100, Ognjen Bezanov wrote:
# pano_modify --center --fov=AUTO --canvas=AUTO --crop=AUTO
--projection=0 -o project.pto ./project.pto
Setting projection to Rectilinear
Center panorama
Fit panorama field of view to best size
Setting field of view to 179 x 178
I
I'm trying to build panoramas with multiple exposures (-2, 0, +2), but
the results (particularly the sky) are much too pale. This is with
basically the 2010.3 release (maybe a few commits before, but nothing
in the hg log jumps out at me).
This seems to be happening at the very start; nona is
On October 22, 2010 10:54:31 pm Robert Krawitz wrote:
I'm trying to build panoramas with multiple exposures (-2, 0, +2), but
the results (particularly the sky) are much too pale. This is with
basically the 2010.3 release (maybe a few commits before, but nothing
in the hg log jumps out at me).
On October 22, 2010 07:09:14 pm Ognjen Bezanov wrote:
And why is the image so large? Each scan is 1578x935 and there are 15 of
them. Assuming they are put end to end (which is not the case, as there
is like 70% overlap between them) we'd get a maximum size of 1578x14025
This is far less than
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 23:41:19 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote:
On October 22, 2010 10:54:31 pm Robert Krawitz wrote:
I'm trying to build panoramas with multiple exposures (-2, 0, +2), but
the results (particularly the sky) are much too pale. This is with
basically the 2010.3 release (maybe a few
On October 21, 2010 03:06:02 am Bruno Postle wrote:
They are only horizon lines when you are stitching a spherical panorama,
with rectilinear output they can be anywhere in the picture just like
vertical lines.
I forgot that not everybody has my habit of stitching equirectangular no
matter
12 matches
Mail list logo
