Hi Greg,
As a workaround hold the control key and move the move. This will
temporarily activate the identify function on all tabs.
This doesn't seem to work for me. You mean move the cursor over the
image visibility buttons, right?
No, I referred to the pano canvas. Over the buttons it
Hi Robert,
On 23 Feb., 03:00, Robert Krawitz r...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
I've made a few more changes to suppress build noise, attached. I've
also attached a build log containing the remaining warnings.
Thanks for the patch. I committed a slightly modified version.
Thomas
--
--
You received
Hi Mick,
2: Is there a way to tell Hugin that certain images 'belong' in a series,
by specifying some kind og gris or Matrix with the file names listed, and
to simply blend in those images with no detail anyway?
with the version from the repository there is something similar
possible:
1.)
Merging nona with enblend/multiblend... Another way of doing this would be
to split the input photos into pyramids, then remap each directly into the
final pyramid..
I have a feeling - just a feeling at the moment, I haven't done any tests -
that the operations can't really be swapped. I
On Sat 23-Feb-2013 at 09:25 -0800, David Horman wrote:
and I suspect doing it like this would avoid the nasty 'whorl'
artefacts we get at the zenith/nadir (this assumption needs
testing).
Do you have an example of the whorls?
You see the 'whorls' when you stitch to equirectangular,
On Saturday, 23 February 2013 at 1:06:50 -0800, T. Modes wrote:
Hi Greg,
As a workaround hold the control key and move the move. This will
temporarily activate the identify function on all tabs.
This doesn't seem to work for me. You mean move the cursor over the
image visibility buttons,
Am Freitag, 22. Februar 2013 13:32:38 UTC+1 schrieb Bruno Postle:
Merging nona with enblend/multiblend. Currently we remap each photo
with nona, then enblend/enfuse splits these remapped images into
multilevel pyramids, joins them into a single pyramid which is then
reassembled into a final
