[hwloc-devel] Create success (hwloc r1.1a1r2491)

2010-09-22 Thread MPI Team
Creating nightly hwloc snapshot SVN tarball was a success. Snapshot: hwloc 1.1a1r2491 Start time: Wed Sep 22 21:01:04 EDT 2010 End time: Wed Sep 22 21:03:14 EDT 2010 Your friendly daemon, Cyrador

Re: [hwloc-devel] roadmap

2010-09-22 Thread Samuel Thibault
Jeff Squyres, le Wed 22 Sep 2010 13:37:12 +0200, a écrit : > I think we should support memory binding, even if it does weird things -- > i.e., dropping membinding support on a given OS shouldn't be an option. That's why I'd tend to keep set_cpubind and set_membind, warning that one may have

Re: [hwloc-devel] roadmap

2010-09-22 Thread Brice Goglin
Le 22/09/2010 16:30, Jeff Squyres a écrit : > On Sep 22, 2010, at 8:09 AM, Brice Goglin wrote: > > >> hwloc_set_*? hwloc_objset* ? Anything better? >> >> hwloc_set_* might not be the best since we would have a hwloc_set_set() >> function to set one bit :) >> > Agreed. Too bad, though -- I

Re: [hwloc-devel] roadmap

2010-09-22 Thread Jeff Squyres
On Sep 22, 2010, at 8:09 AM, Brice Goglin wrote: > hwloc_set_*? hwloc_objset* ? Anything better? > > hwloc_set_* might not be the best since we would have a hwloc_set_set() > function to set one bit :) Agreed. Too bad, though -- I liked hwloc_set*. hwloc_group* (that seems kinda lame, though)

Re: [hwloc-devel] roadmap

2010-09-22 Thread Samuel Thibault
Brice Goglin, le Wed 22 Sep 2010 10:38:38 +0200, a écrit : > * Some OS bind the process too when you bind memory. Not for all kinds of memory bindings. For now, nothing that has been commited does that, it's only the remaining TODOs. The bindings in question are policy binding, i.e. not binding

Re: [hwloc-devel] roadmap

2010-09-22 Thread Brice Goglin
Le 22/09/2010 13:36, Jeff Squyres a écrit : > On Sep 22, 2010, at 4:38 AM, Brice Goglin wrote: > > >> There are still some problems to solve in the membind branch: >> * Some OS bind the process too when you bind memory. I see the following >> solutions: >> + Add a flag such as

[hwloc-devel] roadmap

2010-09-22 Thread Brice Goglin
Hello, hwloc 1.0 was released in May. I think we should release 1.1 before SC10, which means doing a first RC within a couple weeks. trunk got many changes since 1.0, but nothing very important. trac says we're missing memory binding, distances and user-defined process restrictions. Memory

Re: [hwloc-devel] hwloc powerpc rhel5 and power7 patch

2010-09-22 Thread Alexey Kardashevskiy
On 21/09/10 19:34, Samuel Thibault wrote: Just a last question: is it ok to include the /proc and /sys trees you have posted in the hwloc testcases? That's ok.