Jeff Squyres, le Wed 07 Oct 2009 12:28:00 -0400, a écrit :
> On Oct 7, 2009, at 12:20 PM, Brice Goglin wrote:
>
> >> One comment, I see that you have a
> >> hwloc_cpuset_copy (which I would have called duplicate)
> >> but copy in the sense of assignment is not really possible (i.e.
> >> reusi
On Oct 7, 2009, at 12:20 PM, Brice Goglin wrote:
> One comment, I see that you have a
> hwloc_cpuset_copy (which I would have called duplicate)
> but copy in the sense of assignment is not really possible (i.e.
> reusing an existing allocated cpuset, and initialize it with the
> content of
Fawzi Mohamed wrote:
> One comment, I see that you have a
> hwloc_cpuset_copy (which I would have called duplicate)
> but copy in the sense of assignment is not really possible (i.e.
> reusing an existing allocated cpuset, and initialize it with the
> content of another.
I need to think about
On 7-ott-09, at 17:44, Brice Goglin wrote:
I just pushed a huge commit converting everything to dynamic cpusets.
The new API is visable at
https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/hwloc/browser/trunk/include/hwloc/cpuset.h?rev=1109
The implementation is pretty much the same than our old inlines, see
h
I just pushed a huge commit converting everything to dynamic cpusets.
The new API is visable at
https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/hwloc/browser/trunk/include/hwloc/cpuset.h?rev=1109
The implementation is pretty much the same than our old inlines, see
https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/hwloc/browser/tr
On 29-set-09, at 20:51, Fawzi Mohamed wrote:
On 29-set-09, at 20:43, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Fawzi Mohamed, le Tue 29 Sep 2009 20:39:02 +0200, a écrit :
It comes down to what you want to have, if you think you might
want to
go the sparse full granularity way then indeed alloc/copy/free
sh
On 29-set-09, at 20:43, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Fawzi Mohamed, le Tue 29 Sep 2009 20:39:02 +0200, a écrit :
It comes down to what you want to have, if you think you might want
to
go the sparse full granularity way then indeed alloc/copy/free should
be added
Yes, that's my point: do we reall
Fawzi Mohamed, le Tue 29 Sep 2009 20:39:02 +0200, a écrit :
> It comes down to what you want to have, if you think you might want to
> go the sparse full granularity way then indeed alloc/copy/free should
> be added
Yes, that's my point: do we really want it?
Samuel
On 29-set-09, at 19:18, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Samuel Thibault, le Wed 23 Sep 2009 23:51:30 +0200, a écrit :
Also, dynamic-size cpuset_t is actually more efficient for small
boxes
for most operations, as the bitmask will be smaller.
As raised in another thread, dynamic-size cpuset_t could
Samuel Thibault, le Wed 23 Sep 2009 23:51:30 +0200, a écrit :
> Also, dynamic-size cpuset_t is actually more efficient for small boxes
> for most operations, as the bitmask will be smaller.
As raised in another thread, dynamic-size cpuset_t could also permit a
sparse implementation for really big
Jeff Squyres, le Fri 25 Sep 2009 16:02:15 -0400, a écrit :
> If we anticipate changing the fixed-size items now, how about adding
> some kind of version control in the type name now? Or -- more
> specifically -- what are the exact ABI goals? I.e., if we change the
> size of the type, will w
Sorry for not replying earlier.
If we anticipate changing the fixed-size items now, how about adding
some kind of version control in the type name now? Or -- more
specifically -- what are the exact ABI goals? I.e., if we change the
size of the type, will we just require a recompile? Or w
Hello,
Just to give my personal opinion: having another ABI shouldn't hurt
if we put the cpuset size in the soname for instance. In comparison,
having to use functions that allocate/free cpusets like I've done for
the AIX and OSF is a bit tedious (those don't have the choice, they have
to preserv
Hello,
One thing we weren't so sure about while designing libtopology was
whether to use fixed-size cpuset_t or dynamic-size cpuset_t. The
advantage of the former is simplicity of course. The currently defined
size is 1024 cpus and can easily be configured if one needs more. We
could think that 10
14 matches
Mail list logo
