On 10/21/2009 10:38 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Pavan Balaji, le Wed 21 Oct 2009 10:36:33 -0500, a écrit :
>> On 10/21/2009 10:28 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>>> Pavan Balaji, le Wed 21 Oct 2009 09:55:36 -0500, a écrit :
>>>> 1. I see a AC_PROG_CC_C99 in th
> Pavan -- is it a problem to always compile hwloc with gcc?
Yeah, this will be a problem. For us to enable hwloc by default, it'll
need to build with all compilers and on all platforms without errors
(and hopefully without warnings either).
-- Pavan
--
Pavan Balaji
http://www.mcs.anl.
/hwloc/hwloc/src/topology-linux.c:931:
warning: ignoring return value of 'fgets', declared with attribute
warn_unused_result
-- Pavan
--
Pavan Balaji
http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji
On 10/21/2009 10:38 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Pavan Balaji, le Wed 21 Oct 2009 10:36:33 -0500, a écrit :
>> On 10/21/2009 10:28 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>>> Pavan Balaji, le Wed 21 Oct 2009 09:55:36 -0500, a écrit :
>>>> 1. I see a AC_PROG_CC_C99 in th
On 10/21/2009 04:44 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Pavan Balaji, le Wed 21 Oct 2009 16:40:42 -0500, a écrit :
>>> Please read this thread:
>>>
>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/hwloc-devel/2009/09/0054.php
>> Thanks. Is the only issue to not use AC_C_
stopo-lstopo-cairo.o lstopo-lstopo-xml.o
-L/home/balaji/tmp/hwloc/hwloc-0.9.1rc2/src -lm ../src/.libs/libhwloc.so
-ltermcap
../src/.libs/libhwloc.so: undefined reference to `__CPU_SET'
../src/.libs/libhwloc.so: undefined reference to `__CPU_ZERO'
make[1]: *** [lstopo] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory
`/radix-homes/balaji/tmp/hwloc/hwloc-0.9.1rc2/utils'
make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
==
-- Pavan
--
Pavan Balaji
http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji
ion:
% uname -a
Linux bblogin 2.6.24-24-generic #1 SMP Sat Aug 22 00:30:49 UTC 2009
x86_64 GNU/Linux
Attached /proc/cpuinfo as cpuinfo.log. Let me know if you need any more
information.
-- Pavan
On 10/22/2009 02:08 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Pavan Balaji, le Wed 21 Oct 2009 20:31:17 -0500
On 10/22/2009 10:10 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> On Oct 21, 2009, at 5:01 PM, Pavan Balaji wrote:
>
>> The 0.9 branch doesn't build anymore -- missing openfabrics-verbs.h.
>
> Where are you looking? I see openfabrics-verbs.h in the rc2 tarball and
> on the svn v0.9 branch
1/04/2009 03:55 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> Please beat it up and look for problems!
>
> http://www.open-mpi.org/software/hwloc/v0.9/
>
--
Pavan Balaji
http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji
Apologies. This is my bad! My setup was messed up.
On 11/05/2009 01:18 PM, Pavan Balaji wrote:
> Am I supposed to do something special here for hwloc-0.9.2?
>
> % autoconf --version
> autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.63
> Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> Licen
On 11/05/2009 01:21 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> FWIW, you shouldn't need to run autogen on the tarball (or are you
> importing from svn?).
Importing from the svn.
-- Pavan
--
Pavan Balaji
http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji
-
>
> _______
> hwloc-devel mailing list
> hwloc-de...@open-mpi.org
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/hwloc-devel
--
Pavan Balaji
http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji
C99, but whether to
drop C89-only support is a policy decision we are yet to make in MPICH2,
and will need the above patch to get hwloc integrated cleanly in all our
supported environments.
Thanks,
-- Pavan
--
Pavan Balaji
http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji
Darn. The patch is incorrect. Sorry, too sleepy. It should be checking
for $ac_prog_cc_c99 instead. But you get the idea.
-- Pavan
On 05/10/2010 08:56 PM, Pavan Balaji wrote:
I understand that hwloc requires C99 support. However, for compilers
that don't support C99, would you be willing
for the delays folks; I was at the MPI Forum last week and that heavily
distracted me...)
On May 10, 2010, at 9:59 PM, Pavan Balaji wrote:
Darn. The patch is incorrect. Sorry, too sleepy. It should be checking
for $ac_prog_cc_c99 instead. But you get the idea.
-- Pavan
On 05/10/2010 08:56 PM
ever ask PGI why they do this?
Brice
Message original
Sujet: Re: hwloc-devel post from bal...@mcs.anl.gov requires approval
Date : Sun, 01 Aug 2010 12:17:08 -0500
De :Pavan Balaji <bal...@mcs.anl.gov>
Pour : Brice Goglin <brice.gog...@inria.fr>
D'oh! I forgo
) + Core #0 + PU #0 (phys=0)
L1 #1 (32KB) + Core #1 + PU #1 (phys=1)
Thanks,
-- Pavan
--
Pavan Balaji
http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji
an odd logic, but it might just work around pgcc's
crazyness.
Samuel
___
hwloc-devel mailing list
hwloc-de...@open-mpi.org
http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/hwloc-devel
--
Pavan Balaji
http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji
Thanks,
-- Pavan
--
Pavan Balaji
http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji
ted earlier.
https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/hwloc/browser/branches/v1.1/config/hwloc_internal.m4?rev=3120#L162
Is this something that can be fixed in hwloc, or do you guys prefer
having it?
-- Pavan
--
Pavan Balaji
http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji
On 01/20/2011 03:33 PM, Brice Goglin wrote:
Le 20/01/2011 22:16, Pavan Balaji a écrit :
I'd rather keep it. Maybe Jeff can add a m4 macro that your m4 would
call to disable it? Something that would force the default value of
hwloc_want_picky to 0.
Ok, that's fine.
What's surprising
. It's generated
around 9pm US Eastern time.
http://www.open-mpi.org/software/hwloc/nightly/trunk/
--
Pavan Balaji
http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji
, IMO.
-- Pavan
On 11/06/2009 04:22 AM, Pavan Balaji wrote:
Thanks. That worked.
-- Pavan
On 11/05/2009 01:56 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
Ok, I see the issue. Apply the attached patch and see if that works for
you.
I'd prefer not to do another release today, if possible. ;-)
On Nov 5, 2009
he current version. It's just an additional -I path that's missing
in Makefile.am.
-- Pavan
--
Pavan Balaji
http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji
/listinfo.cgi/hwloc-devel
--
Pavan Balaji
http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji
Hi all,
The hwloc code seems to shadow some previously defined variables. These
warnings show up when configured with CFLAGS=-Wshadow with gcc. Here's
a patch to fix these warnings:
https://trac.mcs.anl.gov/projects/mpich2/changeset/9656
-- Pavan
--
Pavan Balaji
http://www.mcs.anl.gov
On 03/31/2012 01:48 AM, Brice Goglin wrote:
Le 31/03/2012 04:06, Pavan Balaji a écrit :
The hwloc code seems to shadow some previously defined variables.
These warnings show up when configured with CFLAGS=-Wshadow with gcc.
Here's a patch to fix these warnings:
https://trac.mcs.anl.gov
piler warning, since state.tagname is a char *, while "topology" is a
const char *.
-- Pavan
--
Pavan Balaji
http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji
On 05/11/2012 02:10 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
On May 11, 2012, at 2:35 PM, Pavan Balaji wrote:
1. The patch to Makefile.am is an ugly hack to get "make dist"
working in hydra. Specifically, autogen.sh was having trouble
running in the tarball created by "make dist", si
Folks,
Here's a minor compiler warning nit-pick in 1.5rc1:
https://trac.mcs.anl.gov/projects/mpich2/changeset/10012
Thanks,
-- Pavan
--
Pavan Balaji
http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji
ively just
typecast that one line, but this seems to be cleaner as you are not
really editing that string anywhere.
-- Pavan
--
Pavan Balaji
http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji
is an issue with automake-1.12 that Dave
noticed.
These lines have been added in v1.5 already.
Thanks.
-- Pavan
--
Pavan Balaji
http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji
Brice,
Sorry, I didn't get to try this patch out. Did it end up in any of the
hwloc releases?
-- Pavan
On 07/24/2012 02:45 PM, Brice Goglin wrote:
Le 24/07/2012 13:39, Brice Goglin a écrit :
Le 23/07/2012 18:40, Pavan Balaji a écrit :
3. The changes to config/hwloc.m4 and include
On 09/06/2012 12:22 AM, Brice Goglin wrote:
No, we didn't apply anything to v1.5. In trunk, we're using sysconf
instead of getpagesize when it supports SC_PAGESIZE or SC_PAGE_SIZE
(very often).
Is this going to go into 1.5.1?
--
Pavan Balaji
http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji
ences Department Tel: +1-510-495-2352
> Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Fax: +1-510-486-6900
>
>
> ___
> hwloc-devel mailing list
> hwloc-de...@open-mpi.org
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/hwloc-devel
>
--
Pavan Balaji
http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji
On 02/05/2013 04:52 PM US Central Time, Pavan Balaji wrote:
> If libpci was disabled by default, would hwloc still come under the same
> GPL issue?
I realized that wasn't very clear. Let me rephrase -- if libpci was
disabled (either by default or a configure argument), would hwloc
On 02/05/2013 05:29 PM US Central Time, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Pavan Balaji, le Tue 05 Feb 2013 23:53:54 +0100, a écrit :
>> I checked libnuma, which seems to be LGPL (phew!), but didn't look at
>> the remaining libraries hwloc uses.
>
> Right. If hwloc was strictly re
On 04/30/2013 02:22 AM US Central Time, Brice Goglin wrote:
> Le 29/04/2013 15:51, Pavan Balaji a écrit :
>> On 04/29/2013 08:36 AM US Central Time, Brice Goglin wrote:
>>>> I wonder if this CFLAGS=-D_POSIX_SOURCE is supported by FreeBSD headers.
>>> I could not fix
One more issue with hwloc-1.7 on the mac.
http://git.mpich.org/mpich.git/commitdiff/d9a67f40
This showed up when we did a strict build of mpich. I believe this can
be reproduced with "-Wall -Werror -O2", but I can find the exact set of
minimum required flags, if needed.
-- Pavan
--
Pavan Balaji
http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji
eah, I hate that platform!) with
c89 builds. Can you pull in this patch:
http://git.mpich.org/mpich.git/commitdiff/939601e0
-- Pavan
--
Pavan Balaji
http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji
On 05/06/2013 04:08 AM US Central Time, Brice Goglin wrote:
> Le 05/05/2013 19:26, Pavan Balaji a écrit :
>> -autoreconf -ivf
>> +autoreconf ${autoreconf_args:"-ivf"}
>> -- 1.8.1.2
>
> This needs an additional dash:
>
> -autoreconf -ivf
> +autore
On 05/06/2013 06:07 AM US Central Time, Pavan Balaji wrote:
>
> On 05/06/2013 04:08 AM US Central Time, Brice Goglin wrote:
>> Le 05/05/2013 19:26, Pavan Balaji a écrit :
>>> -autoreconf -ivf
>>> +autoreconf ${autoreconf_args:"-ivf"}
>>&g
re all stdint.h types which is c99. It
looks like c89 support is not consistent in the code.
Can you check inside HWLOC_SETUP_CORE whether you have the necessary
level of c99 support and fail if you don't?
-- Pavan
--
Pavan Balaji
http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji
equivalent as far as mpich is concerned.
-- Pavan
--
Pavan Balaji
http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji
sion testing is done.
> (5) should likely be OK too.
> (3) and more importantly (4) touch ugly configury, I am not sure I want
> to backport these. Or maybe later, in case we get more testing before
> v1.7.1 occurs.
>
> Brice
>
>
>
>
> Le 05/05/2013 18:18, Pavan Bal
;
> Le 07/05/2013 16:59, Pavan Balaji a écrit :
>> Thanks Brice. What's the timeframe for 1.7.1? I want to see if we can
>> move to that for our mpich-3.1 release.
>>
>> -- Pavan
>>
>> On 05/07/2013 09:53 AM US Central Time, Brice Goglin wrote:
>>>
). The former provides the declaration for the function and
the latter provides the macros used within the definition of the
function (e.g., CTL_HW).
I hope this is a small enough patch to make it into 1.7.1 GA.
-- Pavan
--
Pavan Balaji
http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji
supported, you guys might want to get that fixed
in there. Or at least put up a warning on the website about this.
Regards,
-- Pavan
--
Pavan Balaji
http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji
p 6, 2013, at 10:30 AM, Pavan Balaji <bal...@mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>
>> The mpich-3.0.x series was released with hwloc-1.6.x. One our of partners
>> just brought it to our attention that this version of hwloc has LGPL-2.1
>> code in src/libltdl.
>
> Because GPL
50 matches
Mail list logo
