Re: [I2nsf] Request for WG Adoption Call for I2NSF Data Model Drafts

I suggest that >> any data model is not ready for adoption. >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> John >> >> >> >> *From:* I2nsf [mailto:i2nsf-boun...@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Mr. Jaehoon >> Paul Jeong >> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 31, 2

Re: [I2nsf] Request for WG Adoption Call for I2NSF Data Model Drafts

. Jaehoon Paul > Jeong <jaehoon.p...@gmail.com>; i2nsf@ietf.org; Linda Dunbar < > linda.dun...@huawei.com> > *Subject:* Re: [I2nsf] Request for WG Adoption Call for I2NSF Data Model > Drafts > > > > Hi Yoav, > > > > I understand the adop

Re: [I2nsf] Request for WG Adoption Call for I2NSF Data Model Drafts

; Subject: Re: [I2nsf] Request for WG Adoption Call for I2NSF Data Model Drafts Hi Yoav, I understand the adoption practice :-) What I don't understand is why draft-kumar is titled "Information Model for Consumer-Facing Interface", as it is not an information model. In addition, this

Re: [I2nsf] Request for WG Adoption Call for I2NSF Data Model Drafts

Hi, John > On 2 Nov 2017, at 7:08, John Strassner wrote: > Second, my worry is that draft-kumar is not ready. It is not an information > model; rather, it is (at best) requirements that could be turned into an > information model. In addition, it needs to be

Re: [I2nsf] Request for WG Adoption Call for I2NSF Data Model Drafts

roups.com>; Yoav Nir <ynir.i...@gmail.com>; Linda Dunbar <linda.dun...@huawei.com> Subject: Re: [I2nsf] Request for WG Adoption Call for I2NSF Data Model Drafts Hi John, You are right. :-) Actually, the authors of IM and DM documents for the client-facing interface had a teleco

Re: [I2nsf] Request for WG Adoption Call for I2NSF Data Model Drafts

Hi Linda, Yes, we want to request the WG adoption call for the IM and DM documents together. 1. Information Model for Consumer-Facing Interface to Security Controller (draft-kumar-i2nsf-client-facing-interface-im-04) https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kumar-i2nsf-client-facing-interface-im-04 2.

Re: [I2nsf] Request for WG Adoption Call for I2NSF Data Model Drafts

Wouldn't it be ore prudent to first have the design team meet to discuss alignment issues, and then proceed from the results of that? regards, John On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 9:22 AM, Linda Dunbar wrote: > Paul, > > > > Got your request. > > > > For I2NSF Consumer-Facing

Re: [I2nsf] Request for WG Adoption Call for I2NSF Data Model Drafts

Paul, Got your request. For I2NSF Consumer-Facing Interface YANG Data Model, I think it is better to be called together with draft-kumar-i2nsf-client-facing-interface-im-04. Do you think draft-kumar-i2nsf-client-facing-interface-im-04 is ready? Linda From: Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong