Hi Eric,
This is Paul Jeong who is a coauthor of this draft.
First of all, thank for your interest in our Network Security Function
(NSF) monitoring data model.
Unfortunately, I will be leaving from Montreal in the early morning next
Friday,
so I will not be able to present it.
My student, Dongji
Paul
Thank you for your reply. I am afraid that now the OPSEC agenda is full so I
would suggest to postpone this presentation to IETF-103 in November.
Regards
-éric
From: "Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong"
Date: Thursday, 12 July 2018 at 05:06
To: Eric Vyncke
Cc: "i2nsf@ietf.org" ,
"draft-hong-i2nsf-
Hi Eric,
I suggest that OPSEC WG people attend I2NSF WG session to give us comments
this IETF-102 meeting.
If needed, we will be able to present our draft in OPSEC WG session in
IETF-103 meeting.
Thanks.
Best Regards,
Paul
2018년 7월 12일 (목) 오후 8:51, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) 님이 작성:
> Paul
>
>
>
>
Dear Xialiang:
We are exploring different alternatives where the controller does not see or
know the key material that will finally end in the NSFs.
In the current approach specified in the I-D, both Tx SA and Rx SA will still
have different keys (inbound SA will have a different key than the o
Here is the preliminary agenda for the I2NSF WG session in IETF102
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/102/materials/agenda-102-i2nsf-00
We have very tight schedule that is why you might get shorter time than you
requested.
Linda & Yoav.
___
I2nsf m
At I2NSF WG session in IETF 102 Montreal, many presentations will be on data
models. Reading a model you've never looked at off power point slides and
having no time for discussion is both deathly boring and prone to error.
Therefor we suggest your presentation on data models should have the fol
Hi Linda,
Yes, we authors merged our SFC-enabled I2NSF Architecture draft into our
I2NSF Applicability draft.
However, to support the automated security policy propagation to SFC
framework for a sequence of NSFs (e.g., firewall, DPI, and attack
mitigation), we need an interface between I2NSF Secu
