On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 01:50:25PM -0400, Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote:
Fedora aims for a lightweight [compromise to foster intiatives]:
* Special Interest Group
+ Can be created by anyone
+ One leader (i.e. the person who requests the mailing list)
+ No governance expected or required
For some reason Browse on my XO is having difficulty getting anything from
activities.sugarlabs.org but my PC with Firefox is OK.
Its just activities.sugarlabs.org and its subdirectories
http://www.sugarlabs.org/ is ok
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/ is ok
can anyone confirm that there is a
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 12:45, Martin Langhoffmartin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 2:00 AM, David Farningdfarn...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
This is the goal. But as Martin correctly points out, policies and
rules come at a non-zero price, thus we must be careful that the
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 08:52:08PM +1000, fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote:
For some reason Browse on my XO is having difficulty getting anything from
activities.sugarlabs.org but my PC with Firefox is OK.
Do you mean you can't even open activities.sugarlabs.org page or you
can't download .xo
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009, Martin Dengler wrote:
* Special Interest Group
+ Can be created by anyone
+ One leader (i.e. the person who requests the mailing list)
+ No governance expected or required
+ No accountability in particular
+ Can apply for Project status as it grows
* Project
El Mon, 24-08-2009 a las 20:58 +0200, Martin Langhoff escribió:
And also... and completely from the outside... I'll apologise in
advance for saying something I know might be controversial. I worry
that SL seems to have -- for a external party like me -- more
bureaucracy than it has people
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Bernie Innocentiber...@codewiz.org wrote:
My initial reaction was that community projects work by employing
maintainers rather than project managers.
Exactly. A PM can only fire you. A maintainer/leader can show his/her
priorities in showing areas of focus,
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 16:40, Martin Langhoffmartin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
Still, in general terms it might be years before deployments are in a
position to repay your help. For SL sustainability in terms of effort,
I'd cast a wider look.
I don't think we really expect to be repaid, at
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Tomeu Vizosoto...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
I don't think we really expect to be repaid, at least my opinion is
that it's sad to see so much duplicated work and wasted effort because
knowledge is not where it's actually needed. Just that.
Completely agree with you.
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 17:03, Michael Stonemich...@laptop.org wrote:
El Mon, 24-08-2009 a las 20:58 +0200, Martin Langhoff escribi=F3:
And also... and completely from the outside... I'll apologise in
advance for saying something I know might be controversial. I worry
that SL seems to have --
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 17:50, Martin Langhoffmartin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Tomeu Vizosoto...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
I don't understand how this helps to this discussion. It's obvious
I think Michael just means that there are hints from coming
deployments as
Hi all,
A quick announcement about the creation of a project to start OLPC in
Bangladesh.
A fan page has been created to foster, cultivate and develop a fan base for
this effort in Bangladesh.
http://www.facebook.com/pages/OLPC-Bangladesh/131357564135
Please join, to show your support.
For
The mission of Sugar Labs® is to produce, distribute, and support the
use of the Sugar learning platform; it is a support base and gathering
place for the community of educators and developers to create, extend,
and teach with the Sugar learning platform.
Every day or so, I try to take a look at
Thanks Aleksey
(for the benefit of others we discussed this offlist last night my time)
Aleksey was able to access the site OK but it has been offline on my XO for 48
hours, there was a period last night of about an hour when it was offline on my
PC too. It appears to be a routing issue between
This is a plea.
Sugar has not built successfully for the last five days or so on Ubuntu904.
All the changes that other devs have made cannot be tested because
one(or more) dev didn't test the build after committing changes. We're
all, AFAIK, volunteers. Devs, please try to make the volunteer
Every 12 hours or so sugar is build from scratch on several
distributions via a buildbot. see http://buildbot.sugarlabs.org/ .
It looks like 904 is build on a stock u904. Have you tried deleting
your sugar-jhbuild dir and grabbing recloning from git?
david
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 6:34 PM,
Gary,
I'm tired and sad from talking on this subject but I still don't feel that
I've been understood. (Or, if I have been, I haven't understood the rebuttals
of my position, in which case I apologize for being so dense.) Anyway, here's
one more try:
Wow, blast from the past :-) Actually I'd
On 25 Aug 2009, at 16:49, Gary C Martin wrote:
On 25 Aug 2009, at 16:03, Michael Stone wrote:
El Mon, 24-08-2009 a las 20:58 +0200, Martin Langhoff escribi=F3:
And also... and completely from the outside... I'll apologise in
advance for saying something I know might be controversial. I worry
Wow! Thanks Gary. I'm adding my two cents in two spots!
-- Feature roadmap/Single sign-on from Browse:
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Feature_roadmap/Single_sign-on_from_Browse
Pass. I’ve seen work happening, but having never tested or tried this
side of school server work so don’t know
Gary,
Your reply just made my evening, and even more amusingly, I now think that we
may both be right.
Regards,
Michael
(In what ways are we both right, you ask? Very well:
You're right that some real progress has been made -- you've assembled quite a
list of Gregorio-approved features
20 matches
Mail list logo
